The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

M80 light microscope

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany

The Leica M80 is a light microscope designed for laboratory use. It provides high-quality optical performance and is capable of magnifying specimens up to 80x. The microscope features a durable construction and is intended for routine observations and analyses in various scientific and medical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using m80 light microscope

1

Anthelmintic Screening of Natural Compound Fractions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual fractions (n = 60) (Section 3.3) were tested for their anthelmintic effect on larvae (xL3s) of H. contortus using an established bioassay [11 (link)]. The assay was performed in triplicate. In brief, fractions in 40 μL of LB* (2000 μge/μL) were dispensed into the wells of sterile 368-well flat-bottom microtitre plates (cat. no. 3680; Corning, Corning, NY, USA) containing 80 xL3s; quadruplicate wells with no compound (LB* + 0.6% DMSO; negative control) or monepantel (Zolvix; Elanco, Greenfield, IN, USA), moxidectin (Cydectin; Virbac, Carros, France), monepantel/abamectin (Zolvix Plus; Elanco, Greenfield, IN, USA) and compound MIPS-0018666 (abbreviated here as M-666; ref. [28 (link)]) as positive-controls (20 µM). The motility of xL3s was measured at 90 h, and the development and phenotypic alterations of xL3s at 168 h. At 168 h, larvae in individual wells were fixed with 40 µL of 1% iodine and microscopically examined using a M80 light microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) at 60-times magnification to assess their development based on the presence or absence of a well-developed pharynx [27 (link)], as well as their morphology (phenotype) [7 (link),11 (link)]. At 168 h, xL3s exposed to LB* with ≤0.6% DMSO are expected to reach the L4 stage in vitro within 168 h [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spider Colony Collective Foraging Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We created 36 colonies of 10 spiders (nine nonbold, one bold) 3 days after an ad libitum feeding of 2-week-old crickets. Nine of the spiders in each colony showed the same boldness (i.e. latency: 598 ± 2 s) to resume movement following a predator cue; the remaining spider in each colony resumed movement in 2–568 s. Prior to placing the spiders in each colony, we removed each individual from isolation, weighed it and measured its cephalothorax width using imaging software on a Leica M80 light microscope. In our unrewarding stimulus procedure, keystone individuals could be differentiated from nonkeystones by a single blue acrylic paint dot marked atop their abdomen, whereas other colony members remained unmarked. In our rewarding stimulus procedure, all colony constituents were individually marked using a unique pair of coloured dots atop their cephalothorax, which does not appear to influence individuals' participation in foraging activities (Pruitt et al., 2013 ). Colonies were established in 490 ml clear plastic containers containing a lattice of poultry wiring to facilitate web construction. Colonies were then given 5 days to build a web before their collective-foraging behaviour was tested. Assignment of colonies to the rewarding or unrewarding stimulus treatment was performed haphazardly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Murine Gestation and Embryonic Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were time mated for two-four nights, with females plug checked daily for copulation plugs. Positive plugs were noted as day E0.5 and all females for which a plug was discovered were immediately separated from the male. Gestational length was measured in days post copulation by recording the morning of a copulation plug was detected as E0.5 and visually monitoring females twice daily (morning and afternoon) for births from late gestation (E18.5) until pups were delivered (E19.5-E21.5, depending on oocyte genotype). Pregnant females were euthanised and embryos were collected at E9.5, E12.5 E14.5, E17.5, and E18.5. E9.5 whole sacs were weighed, fixed in 4% PFA for 72 hr at 4 °C, processed, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned at 5 µm. Whole-mount images of E9.5 embryos were taken using a LEICA M80 light microscope with LEICA MC170 HD camera attachment. Embryos and placentas were collected from the same offspring at E12.5, E14.5, E17.5, and E18.5 and weighed separately. Placentas were then bisected, and half was fixed in 4% PFA for 72 hr at 4 °C, processed, and paraffin-embedded with the cut side of the placenta facing the front of the block. The other half of the placenta was rinsed in PBS, snap-frozen on dry ice, and stored at –80 °C for RNA analysis and RRBS. P0 (day of birth) or P3 pups were weighed, euthanised by decapitation, and samples collected as required.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!