The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using truseq stranded total rna prep kit

1

Comprehensive RNA-seq Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The preparation of total RNA was completed with the RNeasy plant mini kit (Tiangen Bio, Beijing, China). Construction of libraries for the rRNA-depleted stranded RNA-seq and small RNA was carried out with the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) and the TruSeq® Small RNA sample preparation guide (Illumina, San Diego, CA), respectively. HISAT2 was used for aligning trimmed sequences to the reference genome (27 (link)). StringTie (version 1.3.1) was used to calculate the FPKM values of lncRNAs and mRNAs (28 (link)), miRNAs were detected using mirDeep2 (version 2.0.5), and miRNA expression was calculated from miRBase. TargetFinder (version 1.6) was used to predict miRNA target genes (29 (link)). CIRI (version 1.1.1) was used to identify and annotate the de novo circRNAs (30 (link)). Differential expression analysis of RNAs was performed (fold change ≥2.0, p-value < 0.05, and FDR <0.05) and then enriched by KEGG (31 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptomic Profiling of Chimeric Livers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The frozen liver tissue samples were homogenized in Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) using TissueLyser LT system (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The isolated RNA was purified by MagMAX RNA Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the construction of strand specific sequencing libraries using TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and the sequencing was performed at NHLBI DNA Sequencing and Genomics Core using Illumina HiSeq 3000 paired-end sequencing platform. The raw fastq files were trimmed by cutadapt/2.8. After quality control by FastQC/0.11.8, the trimmed fastq files were aligned by HISAT2 to mouse GENCODE M23 genome reference for WT mice. For the alignment of RNA-seq data of the chimeric livers from humanized mice, we established the genome reference index by combining both human and mouse genome sequence and renamed the annotation by adding the prefix as “human_” or “mouse_” dependent on the source organism using the annotation versions by human GENCODE v32 and mouse GENCODE M23 [12 (link)]. The aligned reads were calculated by featureCounts (subread/2.0) and differential expression genes (DEGs) were analyzed by R package DESeq2/3.1.0. The statistical information for differential expression analysis can be found in Supplementary Table S5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptional Profiling of iPSC-RPE Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA sequencing was performed on ARB iPSC-RPE, BD iPSC-RPE, and normal iPSC-RPE (n=2 for each) using the Macrogen (Seoul, Korea). Total RNA quality was assessed with Agilent bioanalyzer system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Extracted RNA samples were processed with TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina). A median 1.2×108 single-end reads (range, 1.1×108 to 1.3×108) with 101 base pairs were generated. Reads were trimmed based on sequencing quality using Trimmomatic (RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany).21 (link) Trimmed reads were aligned on a human reference sequence (hg19) using HISAT2 (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA).22 (link) Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, an enrichment of a specific gene set was tested, and core enrichment genes were determined.23 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA-Seq Analysis of Ischemic Muscle Transcriptome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from the ischemic gastrocnemius muscle (n = 4/group) using PureLink® RNA Kit (Life Technology, Grand Island, NY, USA), as previously described [10 (link),19 (link)]. The quality of RNA was monitored by RNA gel electrophoresis following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was performed as described previously [24 (link)]. Briefly, RNA-seq libraries were constructed from 1 µg of total RNA using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The resulting barcoded libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 using 150-cycle High Output Kits (Illumina). Quality control of the resulting sequence data was performed using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (accessed on 28 November 2021)). All data were analyzed using Illumina BaseSpace applications. Sequencing reads were aligned to the mouse mm10 reference transcriptome and using the TopHat Alignment v1.0.0 application [25 (link)]. Expression values (FPKM; Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads) were then generated for each transcript and differentially expressed transcripts (at a false discovery rate (FDR, q-value) of <0.1) were identified using Cufflinks Assembly and Differential Expression v1.1.0 application.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA-seq analysis of IFNg response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA-seq libraries were prepared using TruSeq stranded total RNA prep kit (Illumina Norway AS) targeting the poly-A tail to enrich mRNAs. 15 barcoded libraries (5 control; 5 rIFNg stimulated at 2 h time point; 5 rIFNg stimulated at 24 h time point) were pooled together and sequenced over 2 lanes of HiSeq 3000 (Illumina Norway AS) employing 150 bp paired-end sequencing. Library preparation and sequencing was performed at the Norwegian Sequencing Center, Oslo, Norway.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Illumina RNA-Seq Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA libraries were prepared using Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA prep kit with Ribo-zero gold beads (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, part #20020598) to remove ribosomal RNA and followed manufacturer protocols. Barcodes were added to identify unique samples, with one barcode per sample. All samples were amplified for ten rounds, rather than the recommended 15 to reduce PCR bias, and were evaluated using an E-Gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). To determine library quality and molarity all samples were assessed on an Agilent Biolanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) as well as a Qubit 2.0 (Invitrogen). The findings from the Bioanalyzer were used to pool all libraries in equimolar concentrations for sequencing. The pooled samples were sequenced on three lanes of an Illumina HiSeq 2500 with v4 reagents (paired end, 100 basepair reads) at the Washington State University Genomics Core in Spokane, WA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptome Analysis Using Illumina RNA-Seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mRNA libraries for all four experiments were prepared at the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics (UNSW Australia). The Illumina TruSeq RNA Prep Kit was used for Experiment 1. The Illumina TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Prep Kit was used for Experiments 2-3 and the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Prep Kit was used for Experiment 4. The six RNA-Seq libraries in Experiment 1 were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform, Experiments 2, 3 and 4 were sequenced using the Illumina NextSeq 500. R1.fastq and R2.fastq files were produced for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RNA-seq analysis of Rb cell lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from tumor samples or Rb cell lines (RB006, RB016, RB018, and wRB6) with or without shESRRG knockdown using a combination of TRIzol and an RNeasy Mini RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Prep Kit with Ribo-Zero Gold to remove cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ribosomal RNA according to the manufacturer’s recommendation (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Total RNA-seq libraries were run on an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencing instrument according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA-seq from the four Rb samples that underwent WGS was obtained with permission from dbGaP (phs000352.v1.p1). Reads were aligned and gene counts were made using STAR, data quality was assessed using FastQC and RSeQC, and gene expression was normalized, batch-corrected, and determined using EdgeR. Significant differences (FDR < 0.05) between cells expressing shESRRG versus shGFP control were calculated using EdgeR. For tumor samples that underwent RNA-seq without a detectable biallelic loss of RB1 seen in exome analysis, RNA tracks were manually curated to look for any RB1 mutations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptomic Analysis of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from passages three to five OASC cells expanded from stromal vascular fraction (SVF) with a combination of TriZol and the RNeasy Mini RNA isolation kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). RNA-seq libraries were prepared using the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA prep kit with Ribo-Zero Gold to remove cytoplasmic and mitochondrial rRNA according to the manufacturer's recommendation (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The stem cell RNA-seq libraries were run on an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencing instrument according to the protocols described by the manufacturer (Illumina). Reads were aligned using STAR, data quality was assessed using FastQC and RSeQC, and differential gene expression was determined using both EdgeR and DESeq2. Genes that were differentially expressed according to both EdgeR and DESeq2 were used for downstream analyses. Those differentially expressed genes with a P less than 0.005 a fold change greater than 1.5 were selected for further evaluation (Table 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptomic Analysis of Bacterial Growth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were grown in M9 mineral medium with 0.4% glucose or LB medium, and samples were prepared at five stages of growth from both cultures to evaluate the span of gene expression. RNA was isolated using the Direct-zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with bead beating and a DNase I treatment protocol. RNA was prepared for sequencing with the NEBNext rRNA depletion kit (E7850; New England Biolabs [NEB], USA), followed by TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Prep (kit from Illumina, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Counts were generated with HTSeq aligned to the respective PGAP annotated genome. Comparisons were done with the Mbale and reference strains aligned to the Mbale annotation. Normalization and exploratory analyses were done with DESeq2 (85 (link)) using the R statistical programming hclust package, which utilizes the complete linkage method with Euclidean distances and is represented using the pheatmap package in R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!