The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism v6.0d

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

Prism v6.0d is a data analysis and graphing software developed by GraphPad. It is designed to help researchers and scientists visualize, analyze, and present their data effectively. The software provides a range of tools for curve fitting, statistical analysis, and creating publication-quality graphs and charts.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using prism v6.0d

1

Biomechanical Analysis of DTEHV Fatigue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze DTEHV fatigue behavior over time, a linear regression analysis was performed (Prism V6.0d, Graphpad, USA) on the closing volume, leakage volume, cardiac output, and the effective orifice area, with a slope being significantly non-zero for p < 0.05. Time points were averaged, and represented by their mean ± standard deviation.
For the biomechanical analysis, samples were averaged per valve, and represented by their mean ± standard deviation. The presence of anisotropy was defined as a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the obtained stiffnesses in both radial and circumferential direction, analyzed using a paired student t test (Prism V6.0d, Graphpad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated Image Analysis of Cellular pH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Image sequences were analyzed (registration, background subtraction, ROI intensity versus time analysis) using open-source FIJI software (http://fiji.sc/Fiji). The numerical time series data were analyzed using the IgorPro package (Wavemetrics). Statistical significance of the differences between paired or unpaired samples was tested using Friedman or Kruskall-Wallis tests, respectively, with Nemenyi post hoc analysis, as implemented in the R package (R Development Core Team, 2016 ). Basal pHi was calculated by taking the mean of the first 15 SNARF-5F ratio values from each cell. After glyceraldehyde and 20 mM glucose application, pHi was calculated by taking a mean of the values when the SNARF-5F ratio reached a nadir. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered significant. Cells that were not active at 3 mM glucose and that responded to high glucose with the characteristic [Ca2+]i oscillations were taken as β cells.
All data are given as mean ± SEM unless indicated that they are mean ± SD. Other than for image analysis, as indicated earlier, statistical significance was determined with significance set at <0.05, using either ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison or Student’s t test (where indicated). Statistical significance was determined using GraphPad Prism v.6.0d (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA; http://www.graphpad.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Integrated Bioinformatics Workflow for NGS Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pipelines for primary analysis (filtering and alignment to the reference genome of the raw reads) and secondary analysis (expression quantification, differential gene expression and peak calling) have been integrated in the HTS-flow system89 (link). Bioinformatic and statistical analysis were performed using R with Bioconductor packages and comEpiTools packages90 ,91 . Motif analysis was performed using CentriMo software92 (link). Intron analysis was performed with the INSPEcT tool93 (link),94 (link). Gene lists from RNA and ChIP sequencing were analysed in Enrichr95 . Statistical analyses for IHC and qRT-PCR were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0d (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) as indicated with P ≤ 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Venn diagrams were draw in the interactive tool Venny [https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis Using GraphPad

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0d (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) as indicated with P ≤ 0.05 considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tracking Spinal Cord DTI Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Coefficient of variance (COV) was calculated by estimating the ratio of the standard deviation of mean FA and MD in the spinal cord over time divided by the average of the mean FA and MD measurements over the same time period (COV = σ/μ). Temporal trends in both average and percentage change in FA and MD were displayed for each individual patient. Lastly, the linear relationship between DTI measurements and mJOA were determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and multiple measurements per patient. For these associations, statistical significance was determined by testing whether the slope of the linear trend line was significantly different from zero using an F-test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0d (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) and Matlab (R2011b; Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Imaging Predictors of mJOA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The linear relationship between anatomic, DTI, and MRS measurements and mJOA were determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Next, the relationship between anatomic, DTI, and MRS measurements shown to be correlated with or thought to be associated with mJOA were determined using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. For these associations, statistical significance was determined by testing whether the slope of the linear trend line was significantly different from zero using an F-test. Lastly, multiple linear regression was performed using a model consisting of each imaging parameter shown to have a significant association with mJOA. T-tests were then performed on individual regression coefficients from the multiple linear regression model to determine which parameters added significant value to the prediction of mJOA. Parameters that were not statistically determined to have added value were then removed and the regression process was repeated, resulting in an optimal set of imaging parameters that could be used to predict mJOA score. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0d (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA) and Matlab (R2011b; Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Targeted Cancer Therapies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Student t-tests were used to evaluate differences in cell proliferation and differences in E6, E7, HER3, and NRG1 mRNA expression. Differences were considered statistically significant if *, P < 0.05. To evaluate the sensitivity of cell line xenografts or PDXs to KTN3379, the mean fractional tumor volumes were compared between the vehicle treated and KTN3379 treatment arms at the last time point of the study using two-sample t-tests with equal standard deviations. For clinical parameters, 2×2 contingency tables were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. Overall survival was determined from date of diagnosis to date of death, with censoring at date of last follow-up for surviving patients. The log-rank test was used for univariate survival analysis. These statistical analyses were carried out using Graphpad Prism v6.0d. Multivariate survival analysis was calculated by Cox proportional hazards regression using R v3.2.2. Proportional hazards assumptions were verified using Schoenfeld residuals. Differences were considered statistically significant if *, P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluation of Aortic Valve Repair Device

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary end point was efficacy of the device in reducing the SL distance and increasing CL at the A2-P2 level. The secondary end points included induced iatrogenic aortic valve regurgitation and secondary fistula between the aortic root and the left atrium.
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism V6.0d (GraphPad Software) and SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM Corp). Continuous data are presented as mean and standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Cytokine Secretion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values were expressed as mean ± SEM, and the number of samples (n) was indicated. The statistical significance of differences between control and experimental groups was determined by Student t test with P < 0.05 considered significant (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0d. More information of the materials and methods is in the Supplementary Materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying DNA Repair Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data presented represents the arithmetic mean and error bars represent the standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) of between three (n = 3) and nine (n = 9) independent experiments (n values given in figure legends). Figure legends specify the number of replicates within each independent experiment (performed in duplicate) and the number of independent experiments (n) that were performed to generate the data presented. The arithmetic mean of samples collected for groups of independent experiments for repair frequency statistical analysis, was calculated and data points for each independent experiment used to calculate the mean and standard error of the mean (s.e.m.), calculated as standard deviation/√n, (n indicates the number of independent experiments). Differences between sample pairs repair frequencies were analyzed by Student’s two-tailed unpaired t-test, assuming unequal variance. One-way ANOVA statistical analysis of greater than three samples was performed when indicated. P-values are indicated in the figure legends. All statistics were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0d software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!