The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mimics medical 21

Manufactured by Materialise
Sourced in Belgium

Mimics Medical 21.0 is a software package designed for medical image processing and 3D model creation. It allows users to segment, visualize, and analyze medical image data, such as CT and MRI scans, to create 3D models of anatomical structures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using mimics medical 21

1

Microvascular Imaging via Micro-CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vascular specimens were fixed with formalin and scanned by Skyscan1278 MicroCT with a thin layer of 0.1 mm. The 3D image of intravascular needle tip was reconstructed by Mimics Medical 21.0 software (Materialise, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

3D Reconstruction and Evaluation of TMJ Disc

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DICOM of the MRI in the closed mouth position were used for threshold segmentation (Greyscale Value: 0–235) using Mimics Medical 21.0 software (Materialise, Belgium). Owing to the similar density between TMJ disc, the bone cortex of the condyle, articular eminence and the fossa, an experienced assessor would revise the segmentation manually in order to amend the disc border. After isolating the disc mask from the image background, the masks of discs were acquired to create 3D models of the discs (Fig. 1; Additional file 3).

The workflow of the 3D reconstruction of the TMJ disc

The overall disc volume and dimension of superficial area of the 3D disc model were then calculated. Disc length was measured as the maximum length along the sagittal plane, while the width was measured as maximum length along coronal plane. Furthermore, the maximum cross-sectional area in coronal plane and maximum longitudinal-sectional area in sagittal plane was measured. The condylar height was defined as the vertical distance between lines N and N′ as previously described [17 (link)]. The tangent of the posterior margin of mandibular ramus and the condyle was defined by Line R. Line N was a vertical line of the line R and tangent to the lowest point of the mandibular sigmoid notch. Line N' was designated as a parallel to line N and tangent to the condylar head (Additional file 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

3D Spine Reconstruction from DICOM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient’s CT scan data were input with Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format (Siemens CT machine, SOMATOM Sensation 16, Siemens AG, Forchheim Germany), the thickness of the fault was 2 mm so as to make a suitable virtual whole spine. All the tomographic pictures of the patient were imported into Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Virtual 3D model was created for measurements and 3D printing with threshold of 226-3071HU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preoperative MDCT Imaging and 3D Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A preoperative multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) scan (kVp 120, mAs 300, slice thickness 0.625 mm) was made of the skull using a GE Discovery CT750 HD 64-slice MDCT scanner (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK). The lower leg was scanned with CT angiography (CTA) for visualization of the fibula including vessel anatomy. Both Digital
Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files were uploaded in Mimics Medical 21.0 software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) and converted into 3D models using the thresholding tool; voxels with an HU above a selected threshold value are included in the ROI and transformed into 3D surface models in the Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file format (46 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3D Printed Aortic Root Model for TAVR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 26-mm Evolut PRO (Medtronic) valve frame was implanted into the 3D printed aortic root model using the EnVeo PRO delivery system. The model was also mounted in a fixture for mimicking the confinement and the surrounding structure of the aortic root in the patient anatomy (fig. S3). After performing the CT scans, the aortic root and the valve frame were computationally modeled and reconstructed using the Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise NV) software package. A total of nine splines were added at different levels of the reconstructed frame for the purpose of frame deformation analysis and comparison to the corresponding patient’s postoperative frame dimensions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Cardiac CT Analysis of Left Atrial Geometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LA geometry was segmented from the cardiac CT images using Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise, Inc., Leuven, Belgium) (see Figure 1), and then reconstructed with Geomagic studio (Geomagic, Inc., Morrisville, the United States). The morphological parameters were measured manually using Siemens NX (Siemens Digital Industries Software, Inc., Plano, the United States).
In the measurement, the volume and surface area of the LA and LAA were recorded (see Figure 2A) and so were the cross section of the LAA orifice and its long and short axes (see Figure 2B). Meanwhile, to evaluate the tortuosity of the LAA, the direct length (the distance between the LAA tip and the orifice center) and the actual depth (the distance along the centerline from orifice center to the LAA tip) were measured (see Figure 2C). The tortuosity was calculated based on the LAA direct length and actual depth:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cervical Spine 3D Modeling and Surgical Planning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A healthy 52-year-old man (height 168 cm, weight 70 kg) was recruited to exclude cervical spine-related diseases (e.g., fractures, deformities, tumors, spinal stenosis, and so on). His cervical spine was scanned continuously by computed tomography (CT) from the base of the skull to the seventh cervical vertebra, and 3D CT images of the cervical spine were extracted and saved as DICOM. The DICOM files were imported into Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise, Belgium) and modeled by the default orientation defined by the images. The image threshold was adjusted to separate and remove the vertebrae, other than C4–C6. The eraser function erased the abnormal connections of the adjacent vertebrae to ensure the independence of each vertebra. Erase editing was repeated to successfully build the cervical spine 3D model and export the STL file. Geomagic Wrap 2021 (USA) was opened and imported into the STL file, and after mesh redrawing and polishing, the 3D image of the cervical spine was curved and the result was saved in STP format. The cage shape was set as a hexahedral rectangular structure with a pointed tip on one side; the titanium mesh was a metallic cylindrical mesh structure. The complete cervical spine is grouped into different surgical models.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pelvic CT-based 3D Shelf Implant Design

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the initiation of the study (− 6 weeks), a CT-scan with a standardized protocol (Appendix 1) was made of the entire pelvic area and femora (120 kV, 250 mas, 0.6 mm slice thickness). The CT scans were semi-automatically segmented using imaging processing software, Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). Standardized bone threshold values (HU 226—upper boundary) were used to guide the semi-automatic CT-based anatomical model. This model was saved and transferred using Stereolithography (STL file) to design the 3D shelf implant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Spine 3D Modeling and Surgical Planning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients' CT scan data of the whole spine were collected with Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format (DICOM format data from Siemens CT machine, SOMATOM Sensation 16, Siemens AG, Forchheim, Germany). All the tomographic pictures were imported into Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium), and 3D spine model was established with threshold of 226-3071HU. Further parameter measurement and surgical planning were calculated and simulated in 3-Matic Medical 13.0 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) after importing the created 3D model.
Patients' radiological data were collected and analyzed. The measurement consistency was evaluated between X-ray and preoperative original 3D spine (Pre-OS) models. The results of osteotomy simulation by CA3DSS were evaluated by the measurement in simulated 3D spine (SS) and postoperative original 3D spine (Post-OS) models. The reliability of angle change by different posterior osteotomies was also assessed. Pre-OS model was the 3D spine model reconstructed with preoperative CT scan data, and SS model was the one that Pre-OS model underwent osteotomy simulation. Post-OS model was reconstructed 3D spine model with postoperative CT scan data. The flowchart is depicted in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After sacrificing rats and harvesting the bony segments, the samples were scanned with Cone Beam Computed Scan (CBCT, NewTom VGi, Verona, Italy). The direction of the cone was placed parallel to the coronal surface of bone defects as described previously77 (link). To create 3D reconstruction, the analysis was performed with Mimics Medical 21.0 (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium), and the total volume of bone formation was measured. Briefly, DICOM files were uploaded to the software, and for reconstruction, the lower and upper thresholds ranged between 0 and 700 Hounsfield units. The total bone volume was measured in the cylindrical region (8 mm × 1 mm). Four defect models were calculated for each group, and data were reported as mean ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!