The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using s 450

1

Nanostructure Imaging of Plasmid DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pieces of the metal payload structure with a size of 1×1 cm were cut out and the cutting edge was polished with sandpaper of different grain size (200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 µm). The payload structure pieces were cleaned in distilled water containing detergents and sonicated in an ultrasonic bath 3 times for 5 min. Each metal piece was rinsed at least 3 times in distilled water and subsequently 3 times in 96% ethanol and 3 times in aceton. 50 µg of pEGFP-C3 plasmid DNA or 50 µl of 10 mM Tris buffer were applied and the solutions were dried in a hot air stream. The samples were mounted on the sample holder with carbon adhesive Leit Tabs G3347 (Plano GmbH, Germany), inserted into the sample chamber and observed with the Hitachi S450 scanning electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

pH-Responsive Drug Release Coatings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vitro release profile of IND from the LbL coatings was evaluated in PBS solution at 37 °C. The PLA/HA substrates with LbL coatings were immersed in 25 mL of 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4 or 6.0). PBS (2.5 mL) was withdrawn for UV detection at different time intervals, and another 2.5 mL of fresh PBS was fed back into the original solution. All experiments were run in triplicate. The pH-sensitive release profiles of IND from the LbL coatings in response to different pH conditions were also obtained. The PLA/HA substrates with LbL coatings were immersed in PBS solution against stepwise pH changes between 6.0 and 7.4, which alternated hourly over a 10-h period. The amount of IND released during each hour was measured using 2.5 mL PBS taken from the immersion solution. All experiments were run in triplicate. The surface morphology of the LbL coatings was studied by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) using a Hitachi S-450 (10 kV, Japan). The PLA/HA substrates with Coating-A/S and Coating-AP/S were fabricated following the previous procedure. The original coating, the coatings after incubation in PBS at pH 7.4 for 1 h, the coatings after incubation in PBS at pH 6.0 for 1 h and the coatings after 5 cycles of pH challenge between pH 6.0 and 7.4, were all observed by SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Detailed Analysis of Bone-Implant Interface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The interface region of bone and TNTZ on the sliced implanted sample was observed using a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi S 450, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 15 kV. To confirm any metal ion diffusion from the TNTZ alloy into surrounding tissue, the interface region of the bone and TNTZ alloy on the sliced implant was analyzed using an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX, JEOL JSM-5410LV, Japan). Then, elemental mappings of Ca, Ti, Nb, Ta, and Zr were conducted. For surface chemistry analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed in a PerkinElmer 5500MT spectrometer. XPS data were acquired using Al Kα X rays with pass energy 8 kV. Sputter cleaning was done with Ar+ sputter gun. MaltiPack software was used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Embryoid Bodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Observations with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) were firstly conducted. The EBs were fixed with 2% glutaric dialdehyde, rehydrated in PBS, fixed again with osmic acid and washed in PBS. Next, the EBs were dehydrated by gradient alcohol with amyl acetate, dried with a Critical Point Dryer, sputter-coated by an ionic sprayer meter and observed with a SEM (S450; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Observations were also performed with a transmission electron microscope (TEM). The EBs were fixed with 2% glutaric dialdehyde for 1 h and osmic acid for 1 h, dehydrated by gradient alcohol and incubated with 1:1 acetone embedding liquid in infiltration. The EBs were embedded with EPON and cut into ultra-thin sections, which were then observed with a TEM (JEM-1200EX; Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SEM Analysis of Calcium Carbonate Precipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphology of calcium carbonate precipitation was observed by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM Hitachi S-450). The collected carbonate crystals were mounted
directly into the SEM stubs and sputter-coated with a gold/palladium mixture
(Hitachi HUS-5GB coating unit). Scanning was performed under the condition of
accelerating voltage at 25 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Renal Tissue Preparation for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The renal specimens were collected and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h The renal specimens were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) for 15 min and then dehydrated using serial dilutions of alcohol (50, 70, 80, 90, 95, 99 and 100%). Critical point drying of specimens was performed with liquid CO2 and specimens were sputter-coated with gold and examined using SEM (S-450; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

3D Printed PCL Scaffold Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pure PCL scaffold was prepared with polycaprolactone powder (Cat# 25090, MW = 50,000, Polysciences, Warrington, UK) and a 3D-Bioplotter (Envisiontec, 3D-Bioplotter, Gladbeck, Germany). The nozzle size and strand distance of the scaffold were 200 and 300 μm, respectively. The powder was placed in a steel syringe fastened to the printer and dispensed through a steel nozzle at temperatures >100 °C by applying air pressure (600 ± 25 kPa), and the feed rate was set at 80 mm/min. The PCL scaffolds were printed with a 5.0 mm diameter and were 1.0 mm in height. All scaffolds were sterilized with ethylene oxide before use [40 (link)]. Before coating with PRP, the scaffolds were first treated with ethanolic sodium hydroxide and 30% 0.25 M NaOH:70% absolute ethanol for 2 min to improve surface wettability [41 (link)]. Finally, the scaffolds were observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitachi, S-450, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Anther Preparation for SEM Observation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM observation, anthers were collected at mature pollen stage and immersed in 3% glutaraldehyde (in 0.1 Mol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.2) under 4°C for 7 d. The anther samples were then dehydrated with increasing concentration of ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90% each for 30 min; 100% twice for a total of 60 min), followed by a final 30-min washing with isoamyl acetate. Before observation in a SEM (S-450, Hitachi, Japan), anther samples were further dried out by critical-point drier (CPD-030, Balzers) and covered with gold using a sputter coater (EikoIB5, Hitachi, Japan) [30 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of MON@PG Nanocomposite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The elemental mapping and surface morphology of the MON@PG were investigated via a transmission electron microscope (TEM, S-450, Hitachi Limited, Japan). Particle Size And Zeta Potential Analyzer (Malvern Panalytical, United Kingdom) was applied to measure the average size of the nanocomposite. The optical properties of MON@PG was analyzed by UV–Vis spectroscopy (UV-2600, Shimadzu Vietnam Co., Ltd., Japan). Elemental composition of MON was investigated by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, Oxford Instruments, United Kingdom).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analyzing Starch Bead Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analyzing the outer bead and coating morphologies, scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were captured from plain starch beads as well as starch beads coated with and without blastospores which were previously used for the virulence bioassay (see “Virulence against T. molitor larvae”). Beads were sputtered with gold (EM SCD005, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) prior to SEM (S-450, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!