The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

356 protocols using ni nta

1

Purify Recombinant Proteins Using Ni-NTA Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Timing: 1 h

Remove the uncleaved protein and the remaining TEV protease with Ni affinity chromatography.

Load the Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Ni-NTA, Qiagen) to a Econo column (2.5×10 cm).

Note: Use 10 mL of Ni-NTA.

Note: Ensure that Ni-NTA is resistant to 1 mM DTT and 0.5 mM EDTA in the dialysis buffer. We found that Ni-NTA from Qiagen is suitable for this step.

Equilibrate the Ni-NTA resin with the dialysis buffer.

Load the sample from step #71 to pass through the equilibrated Ni-NTA column and collect the flow-through.

Reload the collected flow-through to the Ni-NTA again.

Repeat step #74–75 for 3 times.

Concentrate the sample using an Amicon Ultra 100-KDa filter up to 10 mL (less than 2 mg/mL concentration) by repeated centrifugation at 1,500×g for 5 min each time.

CRITICAL: Repeated centrifugation at 1,500×g for 5 min each time is critical as exceeded time or centrifugation at higher speed (g) can induce precipitant. Please pipetting the samples after every centrifuge cycle.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of Histidine-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All steps were performed at 0.15 mL/min flow rate. Ni-NTA-Buffer A contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 μg/mL Leupeptin, 800 ng/mL Pepstatin, and 87.1 μg/mL PMSF. Ni-NTA-Buffer B was Ni-NTA-Buffer A supplemented with 250 mM imidazole. The soluble protein fraction was loaded onto a 2 mL Ni-NTA (Qiagen) column pre-equilibrated with 8% Ni-NTA-Buffer B. Non-specifically bound proteins were eluted by washing the column with 20 mL of 8% Ni-NTA-Buffer B. Next, the Ni-NTA-Buffer B was increased to 50% (125 mM imidazole) for 15 mL, and then to 100% (250 mM imidazole) for another 15 mL to elute the protein. Larger (800 μL) fractions were collected for the first elution peak and smaller (200 μL) fractions were collected for the second elution peak. Peak fractions were analyzed on 15% SDS-PAGE gels, and also evaluated for the presence nuclease contaminants as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Kinase Assays of Yeast and Human PASK Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Full-length HIS-tagged yeast Psk1 (pJG858), Psk2 (pJG173) and Ugp1 (pJG210) proteins were purified from yeast (JGY4), while Cbf1 (pJG1031) and USF1 (pJG1233) proteins were from BL21DE3 E. coli (JHG504) as previously described (DeMille et al., 2015 (link)) using Ni-NTA (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) chromotography. hPASK was expressed in Sf9 insect cells using the BAC-to-BAC baculovirus expression system (GIBCO/BRL) as previously described (Rutter et al. 2001 (link)) and purified using Ni-NTA (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) chromatography.
For yeast in vitro kinase assays, purified proteins were incubated with and without Psk1 in a 30 uL reaction containing 1x kinase buffer as previously described (DeMille et al., 2014 (link)). For in vitro kinase assays using purified USF1 and hPASK proteins, reactions were run similar to the yeast proteins except for the following: 1 mM ATP was used and reactions were incubated for 30 min. Ipp1 (expressed from plasmid pJG1025) was purified similarly as Cbf1 and USF1, and was used as a negative control to show specificity of hPASK with USF1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification of MRN and Ku Protein Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRN and variants were expressed in Sf21 insect cells co-infected with up to three viruses (Lee et al., 2013 (link); Yang et al., 2013 (link)). For fluorescent imaging, a triple flag epitope tag was cloned into the C-terminus of human Mre11 in pFastBac1 (Life Tech.) via Q5 PCR mutagenesis (NEB) with primers IF183 and IF184 to generate plasmid pIF240. MRN, MR, and subunits were purified via Ni-NTA (Qiagen), Q HP (GE), SP HP (GE), and Superose 6 (GE) columns. Ku was expressed in Sf21 insect cells using the Bac-to-Bac (Life Tech.) expression system (Yang et al., 2013 (link)). For fluorescent imaging, a triple HA tag was cloned into the C-terminus of Ku80 via two rounds of inverse PCR mutagenesis (NEB) using primers LM002, IF115, IF116, and IF117 to generate pIF2 (See Table S3). Ku was purified via Ni-NTA (Qiagen), Q HP (GE), Heparin (GE), and Superdex 200 (GE) columns.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MUT Protein Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MUT was expressed in E. coli and purified as previously described [Froese et al., 2010b (link)] with minor modifications. For small-scale purification, cells were grown in a total of 50 ml, induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 18°C overnight, harvested by centrifugation at 4,000g, lysed by sonication, and purified by affinity (Ni-NTA; Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) chromatography. Where applicable, chemical chaperones were added concurrently with the IPTG. Samples from total cell lysate (1 μl of 2 ml total) (“L”), including all cellular proteins both soluble and insoluble, and affinity eluants (15 μl of 250 μl total) (“E”), including those soluble proteins eluted from the nickel affinity column, were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue (Expedeon, San Diego, CA, USA). For large-scale purification, cells were grown in a total of 6 l, harvested by centrifugation at 5,000g, lysed with an Emulsiflex C3 homogenizer, and purified by affinity (Ni-NTA, Qiagen), size-exclusion (Superdex 200; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), cleavage with His-tagged TEV protease and reverse-affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA). Purification buffers are detailed in the webpage http://www.thesgc.org/structures/details?pdbid=2XIQ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of Recombinant Protein from E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MUT was expressed in E. coli and purified as previously described [Froese et al., 2010b] with minor modifications. For small‐scale purification, cells were grown in a total of 50 ml, induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl β‐D‐1‐thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 18°C overnight, harvested by centrifugation at 4,000g, lysed by sonication, and purified by affinity (Ni‐NTA; Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) chromatography. Where applicable, chemical chaperones were added concurrently with the IPTG. Samples from total cell lysate (1 μl of 2 ml total) (“L”), including all cellular proteins both soluble and insoluble, and affinity eluants (15 μl of 250 μl total) (“E”), including those soluble proteins eluted from the nickel affinity column, were analyzed by SDS‐PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue (Expedeon, San Diego, CA, USA). For large‐scale purification, cells were grown in a total of 6 l, harvested by centrifugation at 5,000g, lysed with an Emulsiflex C3 homogenizer, and purified by affinity (Ni‐NTA, Qiagen), size‐exclusion (Superdex 200; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK), cleavage with His‐tagged TEV protease and reverse‐affinity chromatography (Ni‐NTA). Purification buffers are detailed in the webpage http://www.thesgc.org/structures/details?pdbid=2XIQ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification of neuronal and endosomal SNARE proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid constructs pTW34 to express rat syntaxin-1A with N-terminally histidine (His)-tagged mouse SNAP-25B were generously provided by J. E. Rothman (Yale University, New Haven, CT) and T. Weber (Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY), and exocytic neuronal SNARE proteins were purified as described (Weber et al., 1998 (link)) by nickel-nitriloacetic acid (Ni NTA; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) chromatography. Pet28a plasmids expressing C-terminal His-tagged VAMP-8 and late endosome SNARE proteins syntaxin-7 and -8 and Vti1b were provided by J. Shen (University of Colorado, Boulder, CO) and purified as described (Yu et al., 2013 (link)) by Ni-NTA (Qiagen) chromatography. His6-tagged human Munc13-4 protein produced in insect Sf9 cells was purified on Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) and further purified by Mono Q anion exchange chromatography (GE Healthcare) as previously described (Shirakawa et al., 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Recombinant Expression and Purification of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Nucleocapsid Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ectodomain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer45 was cloned into mammalian expression vector pCAGGS (Addgene), with a fold-on tag followed by 6×His tag and Strep tag II at the C-terminal. This expression vector was transiently transfected into HEK293F cells and the spike trimer secreted in the supernatant was purified 3-5 days post transfection by metal-affinity chromatography using an Ni-NTA (Qiagen) column. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (N) was cloned into pET28a(+) vector (Millipore-Sigma) with an AAALE linker and 6×His tag at the C-terminal. The NP construct was then used to transform into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells and the target protein was produced and purified from the bacterial lysate by metal affinity chromatography using an Ni-NTA (Qiagen) column, followed by size-exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Radiolabeling and Far-Western Blotting of Purified Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The recombinant gpT5.026 protein was labeled with an isotope 32P using the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (Sigma), as described [20 (link),21 (link),22 (link)], followed by a clean-up on Ni–NTA (Qiagen). Far-Western blotting was performed as previously described [21 (link),23 (link)]. Briefly, 1 μg of purified proteins (gpT5.026 or gp2) were incubated with 20 units of protein kinase A in PKA buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 30 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2) in the presence of 0.4 mCi of γ-[32P] ATP at 30 °C for 1 h, followed by a clean-up on Ni-NTA (Qiagen). 1 μg of RNAP core enzymes or individual RNAP subunits (α, β, β’, and σ70) were applied as small drops on a Hybond ECL membrane and annealed for 3 min at 50 °C. Then, membranes were blocked in PROB buffer (20 mM 1,4-Piperazinediethanesulfonic acid (PIPES) (pH 7.4), 200 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Tween-20, 1% nonfat dried milk) for 2 h at room temperature. Afterwards, each piece of membrane was enveloped in a parafilm sack containing 150 μL of radiolabeled proteins solutions with/without added non-labeled proteins (depending on the design of experiment) in PROB buffer and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Next, membranes were washed three times with 1 mL of PROB buffer and dried at room temperature for 15 min. Results were revealed using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification of Apg2, Hsc70, and DNAJB1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cDNAs of Apg2 (HSPH2), Hsc70 (HSPA8), and DNAJB1 were obtained from Addgene and cloned into pE-SUMO vector (LifeSensors, Malvern, USA). The mutants Apg2ΔAS and Apg2ΔC, carrying a deletion from residue 504 to 569 and 702 to 840, respectively, were cloned by fusing two PCR fragments corresponding to the upstream and downstream sequences of these protein segments [88 (link)] and verified by sequencing. Recombinant proteins containing a tag with 6 histidines and SUMO fused to the N-terminus were expressed in BL21 Rosetta cells and purified with a first step of affinity chromatography using NiNTA (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) columns, followed by treatment with His-Ulp1 to cleave the tag, and a final NiNTA column in which the pure protein eluted in the unbound fraction [89 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!