The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Speedvac spd121p

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The SpeedVac SPD121P is a benchtop centrifugal concentrator used for the evaporation of solvents from samples. It features a compact design and can accommodate a variety of sample containers. The device operates at a consistent speed to gently remove solvents from samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using speedvac spd121p

1

Isolation of Acidic Glycosphingolipids from Cerebral Tumor Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to isolate the raw mixture of acidic GSLs from cerebral tumor tissue, the sample (0.63 g) was subjected to successive steps of extraction and purification [13 (link), 14 (link)].
First, the sample was weighed and subjected to homogenization in a blender in the presence of ice, obtaining a homogenate of about 10% (dry substance content). Then, the homogenate undergoes extraction twice at a temperature of less than 5°C with a mixture of solvents (CHCl3 : MeOH : H2O = 1 : 2 : 0.75, v : v : v), followed by steps of partition and repartition by adding MeOH and H2O to a volume ratio of 1 : 1 : 1. The upper phases (MeOH-H2O) containing polar GSLs are separated from the lower ones and brought to dryness in a rotary evaporator (Speedvac SPD121P ThermoScientific). Further, the sample was purified by gel filtration [14 (link)]. Separation control is done by TLC. The tubes containing the fraction of interest are reunited, and the solvent is removed by entrainment with N2. Finally, the raw mixture is dried in a desiccator over P2O5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soxhlet Extraction of Plant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plant extraction was performed by placing 25 g of each plant (dried and ground) in a Soxhlet extractor and 500 mL of absolute methanol (CTR Scientific, Monterrey, N.L., México) as extraction solvent. Extraction was maintained for 48 h, after which extracts were filtered and concentrated by vacuum evaporation with a rotary evaporator (Buchi R-3000; Brinkman Instruments, Inc., Westbury, NY, USA). Solvent was removed with a SpeedVac SPD121P concentrator (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) at 35 °C [14 (link),15 (link)]. The extraction yield for each of the extracts was calculated by the following Formula (1): % Yield=Final weight of dry extractInitial weight of the plant×100
Next, 100 mg of each extract was dissolved in one milliliter of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), sterilized by filtration, using 0.22 µm pore size-membrane filters (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA), and stored at −20 °C until use. The final concentration of DMSO used in cell cultures was less than 1% (v/v), which did not affect cell viability [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolomic Analysis of Leishmania Infantum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pellets corresponding to 4 x 107L. infantum promastigotes were re-suspended and lysed by addition of 350 μL of cold (4°C) solution of methanol/chloroform/water (3/1/1, v/v/v), and processed for disruption as described for LC-MS samples. Two hundred μL of the resulting supernatant were transferred into a vial and evaporated to dryness in a SpeedVac SPD121P (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA.) at 35°C. For methoximation, 10 μL of O-methoxyamine hydrochloride (15 mg × mL-1) in pyridine were added to each GC (gas chromatography) vial and vortexed vigorously (FB 15024, Fisher Scientific, Spain). The vials were incubated in darkness at room temperature for 16 hours. Then, 10 μL of BSTFA with 1% TMCS (v/v) were added and samples were vortexed for 5 min, silylation was carried out for 1 h at 70°C and finally 100 μL of C18:0 methyl ester (10 mg × L-1 in heptane) were added as an internal standard and samples were mixed again by vortexing gently. Two blank samples were prepared by the same procedure of extraction and derivatization and analyzed at the beginning and at the end of the sequence.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Agilent 1290 Infinity LC and Agilent 6410 Q‐TOF MS/MS were provided by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA). SpeedVac SPD121P used for centrifuges was provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). GTR16‐2 was provided by BJSDBL (Beijing, China), and XW‐80A was provided by Shanxi (Shanghai, China). IKA T10basic‐S25 was provided by IKA (Staufen, Germany), and double distilled water was provided by Millipore (Milan, Italy). Formic acid (#399388), acetonitrile (#34851), 2‐propanol ethyl carbinol (#1570428), methanol (#34860), saturated fatty acid methyl esters (#ME10‐1KT), xylene substitute (#A5597), ethanol (#443611), hematoxylin (#H9627), hydrochloric acid (32 wt. % in H2O, #W530574), ammonia (28% NH3 in H2O, #338818), and eosin (#E4009) were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolite extraction and analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After disruption of the cellular pellets, as described for LC-MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), 150 μL of the supernatant were transferred into a new tube and evaporated to dryness in a SpeedVac SPD121P (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 35°C. The metabolite extracts were re-suspended in 150 μL MilliQ water, centrifuged (15700 × g, 15 min, 4°C) and injected into the instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolomic Profiling of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pellets with 5 × 106 uninfected or infected macrophages were re-suspended in 350 µL of cold methanol/water (3:1, v:v) and 25 mg of glass beads (710–1180 µM, G1152, SigmaAldrich, Germany), followed by four cycles of frost/defrosting in a liquid N2/37 °C bath. The cells were disrupted at 50 mHz for 10 min in TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, Germany). The samples were clarified by 15,700× g for 10 min at 4 °C centrifugation and the supernatant was collected and evaporated to dryness by SpeedVac SPD121P (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA.) at 35 °C for 2 h. After this, the solid residue was re-suspended in 60 µL 0.1 M formic acid with 0.2 mM of methionine sulfone, homogenized for 15 min in a vortex, and centrifuged at 15,700× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The 35 µL of supernatant was transferred to polypropylene vials (Agilent Techno Vials, Waldbronn, Germany) for analysis. Quality-control (QC) samples were prepared by pooling equal volumes of all the samples and they were analyzed along the analytical sequence, to evaluate the stability and performance of the instruments during measurements [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Bacterial Metabolite Extraction and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were cultured in 120 mL of GYM broth for four weeks, under shaking (120 rpm) at 28 °C. Cultures were then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and biomass and supernatants were separated. For the preparation of methanol extracts, biomass was suspended (w/v) with two volumes of methanol, homogenized, and sonicated for five minutes, after which it was stirred for 48 h at 120 rpm at 25 °C in darkness [24 ]. To prepare ethyl acetate extracts, 50 mL of the supernatant was placed in a separatory funnel with 100 mL of the solvent, which was manually shaken for five minutes and the organic phase was discarded [25 (link)]. Solvents were removed with a SpeedVac SPD121P concentrator (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) at 35 °C. Then, 1 mg of solvent-based extracts was suspended in 20 µL of 99.5% dimethylsufoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), filtered by 0.20 µm filters (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA), and stored at −20 °C, until use [26 (link)]. The final DMSO concentration in cell cultures was less than 1%, which did not affect cell viability. Extract yields were analyzed by the following Formula (1):
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction and Analysis of Fig Polyphenols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were derived from 12 different Italian fig cultivars collected in September 2013 from an experimental plot located in Carmignano (Tuscany, Italy). The overall information of all analyzed fig cultivars is reported in Table 3. The fig fruits were manually peeled, and peel was then freeze-dried (Heto Hetovac VR-1 and CT 110 Vacuum Concentrator, Heto Lab Equipment, Roskilde, Denmark) and subsequently homogenized using a mortar. All samples were then stored at −80% until (poly)phenol extraction. Dried fig (poly)phenols were extracted by accurately weighing 200 mg of freeze-dried powder in a plastic tube and by adding 5 mL of a solvent mixture containing acetone/water/formic acid, 80/19.5/0.5 (v/v/v) [10 (link)]. Tubes were vortexed for approximately 30 s, sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min, vortexed again for 30 s and finally centrifuged for 10 min at 2575 g. The supernatant was then evaporated through a centrifugal concentrator (SpeedVac SPD121P, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., San José, CA, USA) and the residual pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of 0.1% aqueous formic acid before uHPLC-MSn analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction of Phytohormones from Frozen Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen root tissue was homogenized to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. 150 mg of this powder was transferred to a 2 ml safe-lock Eppendorf micro-extraction tube. Samples were extracted with 1.5 ml of 60% acetone/water (v/v), containing 2-mm yttria stabilized zirconium oxide beads (Next Advance, Inc., Troy, NY, USA) and 5 pmol of internal standards (GR24, [2H6]-2′-epi-5-DS, [2H6]-5-DS) in order to control for the extraction recovery. Additional homogenization was performed using a bead mill—Tissue-Lyzer II (Qiagen Sciences, Inc., Germantown, MD, USA) at 27 Hz for 3 min. Subsequently, samples were sonicated for 3 min in a Brandson 3510 ultrasonic bath under cooling with ice water and shaken for 30 min in a cold room (4 °C) using a Loopster benchtop laboratory rotator (IKA®-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany) at 20 rpm. After centrifugation (16.000 rpm/10 min/4 °C), the supernatant was collected and the organic solvent was removed in vacuo (Thermo Fisher Scientific SPD121P SpeedVac, Whaltman, MA, USA). The remaining aqueous phase (approx. 0.9 ml) was made up to 1.5 ml by addition of 25% acetonitrile/water (v/v) in order to quantitatively dissolve SL analytes and achieve suitable SPE loading conditions (5–10% acetonitrile/water, v/v).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Content Determination in Worms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein content was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method previously described [81] (link) with slight modifications. Briefly, the pellet from 50 worms was dried in a Speed Vac Concentrator (SPD12 1P SpeedVac, Thermo Scientific), 20 µl of 1 M NaOH was added to the dry pellet. Fat was degraded by heating at 70°C for 25 min and 180 µl of distilled water was added. After vortexing, the tubes were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 5 min and 25 µl of the supernatant were transferred into a 96 well plate. Next, 200 µl of the BCA reagent prepared according manufacturer's instructions (Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit, Thermo Scientific) and added to the sample. After incubation at 37°C for 30 min, the plate was cooled to room temperature and absorbance was measured using the POLARstar Omega luminometer (BGM Labtech) at 560 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!