The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

85 protocols using primo star microscope

1

Quantifying Aortic Atherosclerotic Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atherosclerotic lesions in the aortic root were measured as previously reported [29 (link),30 (link)]. Briefly, at the end of the experiments, the vasculature of mice was perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde for approximately 5 min through the heart. The aortic root and adjacent heart were excised and sectioned in 10‐μm thickness on a cryostat. Cryosections were stained with oil red O and hematoxylin and counterstained with fast green. Atherosclerotic lesion areas were measured with a Zeiss PrimoStar microscope connected with an Axiocam camera. The lesion areas of five sections with the largest readings were averaged for each mouse, and this average was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Stomatal Aperture Analysis in Transgenic Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stomatal apertures were analyzed using a modified protocol based on a procedure described by Liu et al. (2009) (link). Leaf discs of 4-wk-old transgenic A. thaliana zar1-1 plants expressing wild-type or mutant HopZ1a were incubated, with the abaxial side facing down, in an MES buffer (10 mM KCl, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 10 mM MES-KOH (pH 6.5) and 0.025% silvet-77). Full opening of the stomata was induced by placing the discs under illumination for at least 2 h before the buffer was replaced with fresh MES buffer containing 10 μM flg22. Leaf discs were then incubated with flg22 under illumination for another 2 h. Medical adhesive (Hollister, Libertyville, IL, USA) was applied to a slide and the leaf discs were placed on the adhesive with the abaxial side facing down. A razor blade was then used to carefully scrape away the upper epidermis and the stomata were immediately observed using a Primo Star microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). At least ten independent images were taken for each treatment and at least six stomata per image were analyzed for aperture, which was expressed as the ratio of width over length.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cyphophthalmid Harvestmen Spermatopositor Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimens were collected during 15th–16th February 2014 through meticulous visual search throughout the floors of the forest and buildings. All specimens were captured with a fine brush and placed in vials containing 75% and 100% ethanol.
Nomenclature of body parts and measurements follows the model of Benavides and Giribet (2013) . Terminology of the structures of spermatopositor follows Juberthie (1970 ; 1979 ) and Karaman (2013) , with some modifications: (1) recognition of apical movable fingers (dma, digitus mobilis apicalis) which might not be homologous with dml (doigt mobile latéral) of Juberthie/Karaman, and (2) naming of three groups A, B, C of microtrichiae, hitherto unnamed, which are clearly recognizable also in other families of Cyphophthalmi (Fig. 6).
The following abbreviations are used: MNRJ

= Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

; QCAZ

= Museo de Zoologia, Pontifícia Universidad Catolica del Ecuador – Quito, Ecuador

; MCZ

= Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

.
Illustrations of the spermatopositor and ovipositor were made through a Carl Zeiss Primo Star microscope and AxioVision LE image capture system, with the stacking software Combine ZP Suite (by Alan Hadley). SEM images were made at JEOL JSM-6390 LV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Parasitological Analysis of Fecal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Faecal samples were analysed in the Laboratory of Parasitology of the National Institute of Tropical Medicine (INMeT) in Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina. We processed samples using a semi-quantitative flotation method with a saturated sugar solution55 (link). We weighted 3 g of faecal sample, then homogenised it, and after centrifugation we mounted it on a slide. We used a Carl Zeiss Primo Star Microscope to identify parasite structures and took pictures with Carl Zeiss AxioCam Cc1 using the 40x magnifier. Eggs and larvae were counted and identified on the basis of colour, shape, content and size. Although most samples reached 3 g after being processed, some samples did not reach this threshold. However, since some parasites were detectable even in < 3 g samples, instead of discarding them, we decided to consider faecal sample’s weight as a control factor in our analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RORγ Overexpression Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were plated in 6-well plates and cultured for 24 h and then subjected to the lentiviral transduction particles packing RORγ overexpression and control vector system for 12 h transfection. The scratches were produced across the cell monolayers with yellow tips. And the cells were washed with PBS solution for three times to remove the shedding cells. Then, the cells were cultured in fresh culture medium for another 48 h, and the confluence of cells was recorded with PrimoStar microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The migration index was calculated with the ratio of the scratch area between RORγ overexpression and vector cells by Image J software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microscopic Protein and Collagen Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The digital imaging system, comprising a Zeiss Primo Star microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and a Canon EOS 550D camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan), was used for image digitization. Ten HPFs were randomly captured per slide. I-solution program was used to quantify protein expression, BCL-2 and BAX immunolabeling protein expression was determined as the cancer area labeled intensity (μm2) in each slide, and an average was calculated. Moreover, Masson's Trichrome stained slide was also digitalized in 10 random HPFs. The blue staining areas were indicated as collagen formation area or fibrosis area and were measured by I-solution program (IMT, Canada). An average was calculated by Excel software (Microsoft, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of FAK

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microscopy of FAK, cryosections were immunofluorescently labeled with primary antibodies used for IHC which were FAK Antibody (1:200; Cell Signaling) [27 (link)]. Antibody incubations were carried out at 4 °C in a humidified chamber, overnight. Bound antibody was visualized using anti-rabbit (1:50; Cell Signaling, USA) secondary antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate. Fluorescently labeled sections were treated with 95% ethanol and then mounted under coverslips with Vectashield mountant containing propidium iodide (Vector Laboratories) before viewing under the microscope. Control sections were processed as above with omission of the primary antibodies. Microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Primo Star microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Caudal Epididymal Sperm Counting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The caudal epididymis was dissected from 8-week-old mice. Spermatozoa were squeezed out from the caudal epididymis and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C under 5% CO2. The incubated sperm medium was then diluted 1:10. A cover slip was placed on the hemocytometer before a drop with 10 μl of diluted caudal epididymal sperm solution was loaded under the cover slip. The hemocytometer was placed under the Primo Star microscope (Zeiss) and viewed under ×400 magnification. The microscope was not equipped with camera or software, and the light source of the microscope is LED: 3 W 3200k. Sperm count was done by counting 4 × 4 squares (horizontally or vertically) using the hemocytometer and calculated using the formula: Sperm count = total no. of sperm in 5 squares × 50,000 × dilution multiple (cells/ml). Counting was only done for sperm tails that was found within the square areas. The total number of sperm was counted and the mean was calculated from three counts. Six independent experiments were performed. The data were then analyzed with GraphPad Prism 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Parasitemia Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides for the experiments were counted on a light microscope using 100X objective with oil immersion with a 1:4 reticle on a Zeiss Primo Star microscope. The slides were counted and accessed for stages using the whole field method [41 (link)] across multiple fields (15–20 fields) until 500 red blood cells were counted in the small box of the 1:4 reticle. The slides for the different time points during the experiment were prepared using a cytospin (Shandon/Thermo Scientific) with 100 µL 10% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS. Parasitaemia was calculated as: #infected cells(#RBCs×whole field factor)×100% where the whole field factor for the 1:4 reticle was 10.9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Counting Hemocytes in Invertebrate Immune Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The number of circulating haemocytes was determined according to Urbański et al. [43 (link)]. Twenty-four hours after injection of EXT, the hemolymph sample (2 µL) was gently mixed with the 20 µL of the physiological saline solution and the anticoagulation buffer (4.5 mM citric acid and 9 mM sodium citrate; 5:1, v/v) and then placed on the Bürker chamber. The photos of 24 randomly selected squares were taken with a Zeiss Primostar microscope equipped with Axiocam 105 digital camera (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). To evaluate the number of haemocytes on the photos, cells were counted using ImageJ software (version 2., public domain, https://imagej.net/software/imagej2/ (accessed on 20 October 2022)). At least 13 individuals were used per treatment (Control—16, EXT 0.01%—14 and EXT 0.1%—13).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!