The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6495 triple quadrupole

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The 6495 Triple Quadrupole is a high-performance mass spectrometry instrument manufactured by Agilent Technologies. It is designed to provide precise and accurate quantitative analysis of complex samples. The 6495 Triple Quadrupole utilizes a triple quadrupole configuration, which enables the instrument to perform tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments for improved selectivity and sensitivity.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using 6495 triple quadrupole

1

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Spironolactone Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Agilent 6495 Triple Quadrupole (Santa Clara, USA) served as a mass analyzer. The heated ESI ionization source (Agilent JetStream Technology) in the positive mode was used. Nitrogen served as a nebulizing, sheath, drying, and collision gas. Sheath gas temperature was set to 350 °C and drying gas temperature to 250 °C. The data were collected in the MRM mode; the transitions monitored and the respective collision energies are listed in Table 1. The LC-MS system was controlled with the Agilent MassHunter Workstation software version B.07.00. For peak integration and quantitative calculations, the Agilent MassHunter Quantitative Analysis software version B.07.00 was used.

MRM transitions used for analysis with collision energies (CE)

CompoundPrecursor ionProduct ion
QuantifierQualifier
m/zm/zCE, Vm/zCE, V
Spironolactone341107383412
Canrenone341107383412
7-Alpha-methylthiospironolactone3893411432314
Spironolactone-D3344107323412
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification and Characterization of ONC201

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solutions were analyzed via high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1260 Infinity) coupled with diode array and mass spectrometry detection (6495 triple quadrupole, Agilent technology, Cheadle, UK). The stationary phase was a Phenomenex C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 µm). The mobile phase was a gradient combining 0.1% (v/v) formic acid added in both solvents: pure water and 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile and 0.1% acid formic (solvent B). The gradient program was set as follows: 0 to 35 min, 95% A → 0%; 35–37 min, 95 → 5% B; 37–40 min, 95% A/5% B with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min−1. The injection volume was 5 μL, and column temperature was set to 30 °C with a UV wavelength of 254 nm.
The UV spectra of ONC201 were recorded with a spectrophotometer UV 7 (Mettler Toledo; Viroflay, France); the pH of the studied solutions was fixed by the use of sodium hydroxide and chlorohydric acid.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive GC-MS/MS and UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Shimadzu Nexis 2030 gas chromatograph equipped with a programmed split/splitless injector and an AOC 6000 multifunction autosampler (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and a Shimadzu 8040 138 NX tandem mass spectrometry (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) were used to perform gas chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) confirmation. An SH-Rxi-5Sil MS (30 m 140 × 0.25 mm id × 0.25 μm film) capillary column was used. A 1290 Infinity UHPLC system was linked to a 6495 Triple Quadrupole LC-MS/MS device added with a jet stream EI source (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Data were acquired and analyzed on an Agilent MassHunter Workstation B.07.00. Chromatographic isolation was finished on an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) with gradient elution.
Samples were prepared using a GENIUS 3 vortex agitator (IKA, Stauffen, Germany), a CL31R multispeed refrigerated centrifuge (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), a WD12 water bath nitrogen blowing instrument (Aosheng Instrument, Hangzhou, China), and a CK2000 high-throughput tissue grinder (Thmorgan Biotechnology, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating ionization efficiency predictions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proposed method was validated on a set of 35 pesticides and mycotoxins (Table S7), 28 of which had not been included in the training or test set. The chemical space covered by the validation compounds can be seen from Fig. S3. The compounds were measured at 10 concentration levels in solvent (acetonitrile), oat, barley, rye, wheat, rice, and maize with Agilent 6495 triple quadrupole instrument. The concentrations of the compounds ranged over 5 orders of magnitude from 3.6 nM to 0.35 mM. Altogether, 2233 data points (pesticide, matrix, and concentration combinations) were measured and corresponding concentrations were predicted. The validation set was used to evaluate the applicability of the ionization efficiency predictions for compounds not included in the training or test set. All measurements were also done under gradient separation and on an instrument that was not the primary instrument for ionization efficiency measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!