The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using q tof ms premier

1

Quantifying HiPMO1 Reaction Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used two different methods of LC–MS analysis for identifying HiPMO1 reaction products. (i) Full Scan LC–MS: We analyzed HiPMO1 reaction products using Full Scan LC–MS with a HPLC analysis system and a LC–MS-2020 mass spectrometer (Shimadzu). We performed HPLC analysis on a C18 column (Agela Odyssil C18, 2.1 × 100 mm) with methanol and water (90:10, v/v), containing 0.2% formic acid as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. Mass spectra were acquired in their positive and negative mode, respectively. The full scan m/z ranged from 100 to 300. (ii) SIM LC–MS/MS: We analyzed HiPMO1 reaction products using SIM LC–MS (ACQUITY UPLC and Q-TOF MS Premier, Waters) on a U3000-HPLC C18 column (Agilent Zorbax SB-C18, 150 × 4.6 mm). The SIM LC–MS settings were as follows: mobile phase A: acetonitrile (5–100%); mobile phase B: water; time: 50 min; flow rate: 0.5 mL/min; ESI mode: positive and negative ionization SIM mode; selected molecular ions: glucuronic acid (m/z 194), saccharic acid (m/z 210), and saccharic acid lactone (m/z 192). Collision-induced dissociation was used for the MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolite profiling of plant leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freeze-dried leaves (30 mg per sample) were homogenized on ice in 1 ml of MeOH:H2O (10:90) containing 0.01% of HCOOH with metal balls (2 mm ø). The homogenates were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 20 min at 5 °C. The supernatant was recovered and filtrated through 0.2 µm of regenerated cellulose filters (Teknokroma). An aliquot (20 µl) of the filtered extract was used for LC–MS analysis. Full metabolomics profiling was carried out by non-targeted analysis using an Acquity UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) interfaced to a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-TOF MS Premier). The LC separation was performed with a Kinetex C18 analytical column, 1.7 µm particle size, 50 mm × 2.1 mm (Phenomenex). Elution of metabolites was performed using a gradient of methanol and water, both containing 0.01% of HCOOH. The gradient started with an aqueous solvent al 95% and a flow of 0.3 ml min−1. The gradient reached 50% of aqueous solvent at 8 min, increasing the level of organic solvent to 95% at 12 min. The gradient was kept in isocratic conditions for 1 min and later returned to initial conditions in 2 min. The column could equilibrate for 3 min, for a total of 22 min per sample. The library of compounds used for straight compound identification as well as the Q-TOF MS parameters were set as described by Gamir et al. (2014) [49 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolomic Analysis of Plant Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolomic analysis was carried out with six biological replicates per treatment. Fifty milligrams of freeze-dried leaf or root material were extracted at 4 °C with 1 ml of MeOH:H2O (10:90) containing 0.01% of HCOOH. After the centrifugation at full speed at 4 °C for 15 min, the supernatant was filtered through 0.2 μm cellulose filters (Regenerated Cellulose Filter, 0.20 μm, 13 mm D. pk/100; Teknokroma). 20 μl were injected into an Acquity UPLC system (Waters, Mildford, MA, USA) interfaced with a hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight instrument (QTOF MS Premier). Subsequently, a second fragmentation function was introduced into the TOF analyser to identify the signals detected. This function was programmed in a t-wave ranging from 5 to 45 eV to obtain a fragmentation spectrum of each analyte (Gamir et al., 2014) (link). Positive and negative electrospray signals were analysed independently to obtain a global view of the data conduct. To elute analytes, a gradient of methanol and water containing 0.01% HCOOH was used. Three independent biological replicates per treatment, each with three technical replicates, were randomly injected. The LC separation was performed using an UPLC Kinetex 2.6 μm particle size EVO C18 100 A, 50 x 2.1 mm (Phenomenex). Chromatographic conditions and solvent gradients and further were established as described by Gamir et al. (2014) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification and Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solvents, reagents and intermediates that were commercially available were purchased and used as received. Dry solvents were purchased in Sure Seal bottles stored over molecular sieves. 1H NMR and 13C spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance 400 spectrometer at 25 °C using DMSO-d6 and CDCl3 as solvents, and chemical shifts are reported as ppm downfield from Me4Si with the number of protons, multiplicities and coupling constants in hertz indicated parenthetically. Signal splitting patterns are described as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), multiplet (m), broadened (b), or a combination thereof. Mass spectroscopy (MS) data were collected using a Waters Q-TOF Premier MS with electron spray ionization. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on 0.20 mm silica gel F-254 plates (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical, China). Silica gel 60 with a 300–400 mesh (Qingdao Haiyang Chemical, China) was used and visualization was performed under a UV lamp (254/365 nm). The purity of the final compound was assessed at a wavelength of 210 nm, 254 nm, 268 nm, 230 nm by HPLC analysis. The system was equipped with a DAD UV detector and an Dionex SN: 005581 acclaim @ 120 C18 column (5 μm, 120 Å, 4.6 × 250 mm), and the separations were achieved at rt. The HPLC gradient program utilized 60% MeCN in H2O over 16 min with a 1 mL min−1 flow rate. The purity of target compound was >95% by HPLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-resolution UPLC-MS/MS Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse-phase ultra performance-liquid chromatography (UPLC), using C-18 columns, was coupled to a Q-TOF Premier™ MS (Waters) system through a nano-electron spray ionization (ESI) online emitter (see Additional file 1, page 2). LC-MSE data was processed using ProteinLynx Global Server v.2.5 (Waters Corporation) and Rosetta Elucidator v.3.3 (Rosetta Biosoftware, Seattle, WA). Criteria for protein identification were ≥3 fragment ions per peptide, ≥7 fragment ions per protein and ≥2 peptides per protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Labeling Protocols for PET and SPECT Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Monosodium salt of 1-amino-8-naphthol-2, 4-disulfonic acid was purchased from TCI America, and all other chemicals were from Sigma-Aldrich. Mass spectra (MS) were obtained on a Waters Acquity UPLC system coupled with Waters Q-Tof Premier MS (liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry [LC-MS]). Semipreparative reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on a Waters 600 gradient system with a Waters 996 Photodiode Array detector using a Waters Nova-Pak HR C18 column (6 μm, 300 × 7.8 mm). Analytic reversed-phase HPLC was performed on a Perkin-Elmer Series 200 LC gradient system with a Waters 2784 Dual Absorbance ultraviolet detector plus a Bioscan radioisotope detector using a Waters Symmetry column (5 μm, 150 × 3.9 mm). The flow rate was 6 mL/min for the semipreparative column and 1 mL/min for the analytic column running the same linear gradient starting from 5% A (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile) and 95% B (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water) for 5 min and increasing A to 65% at 35 min. A Varian Bond Elut C18 column (100 mg) was used for solid-phase extraction of the labeled product. 18F-fluoride and 64CuCl2 were obtained from the National Institutes of Health cyclotron facility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!