The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using rna lysis buffer

1

HIV Drug Resistance Genotyping from DBS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from DBS cards using the Sample Preparation System for RNA on the Abbott m2000sp (Abbott Laboratories). One to three entire spots (depending on availability) were eluted in 1.7ml RNA Lysis Buffer (Promega) for 2 hours at ambient temperature and extracted using the Abbott 0.6 ml protocol. Previously described primers 12 (link) did not produce any amplicons, so new nested primers for smaller regions of the RT gene (codons 41-116 and 135-230) were used. RNA was concentrated using RNA Clean and Concentrator columns (Zymo Research), eluting into 10ul water. The concentrated RNA was used to synthesize a single cDNA strand with 2 downstream primers and SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). One-quarter of the reaction was used in a nested PCR using the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche Life Science). The two RT regions were amplified and sequenced. Successful sequences were analyzed using Sequencher 5.3 software and the results were submitted to the Stanford University Drug Resistance Database (http://hivdb.stanford.edu) to determine resistance mutations. In some cases, one of the two RT regions did not amplify, so resistance was only scored for the region that was successfully amplified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating HCEC Response to TNF-α

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 2 × 104/well HCECs were seeded and cultured on different AMs for 24 h. Media were removed and fresh medium “‐Tumor Necrosis Factor‐alpha (‐TNF‐α)” or fresh medium containing 10 ng/ml of human TNF‐α (Cat#300‐01A, PeproTech Cranbury, NJ) “+TNF‐α” were added to cells and incubated for 24, 48, or 72 h. At each time point, the supernatants were collected for multiplex analysis, and the cells were lysed in 0.2 ml of RNA lysis buffer (Promega, Durham, NC) for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis, as described below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Cultivation of L. major Amastigotes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
L. major amastigotes were obtained as follows: bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were isolated from female BALB/c mice, as previously described [27 (link)]. Then, the BMDMs were plated with a density of 106 cells per well in 24-well plates. After 24 h of incubation, macrophages were infected with LmJ3OE or LmMC PNA(-) metacyclic promastigotes parasites, at a ratio of 10:1 (parasites/macrophages). At 24 h post-infection, non-phagocytosed parasites were washed off with PBS, and infected BMDMs were further incubated for 96 h. At this time, BMDMs containing LmJ3OE or LmMC amastigotes were collected with 200 µl of RNA lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Fibrotic Markers in LX-2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantification of the relative expression of fibrotic markers by qPCR was performed as previously described [21 (link)]. Briefly, LX-2 cells or activated LX-2 cells were cultured in the presence or absence of exosomes for 48 h. The cells were then lysed in 0.2 mL of RNA lysis buffer (Promega, Durham, NC, USA). Total RNA from these lysates was purified using SV 96 Total RNA Isolation System (Promega, Madisin, WI, USA). RNA concentration and purity were measured using TECAN Spark Nano plate (TECAN, Morrisville, NC, USA). cDNA preparation and qPCR were performed as described [76 (link)]. The primers used for qPCR were described in Materials. Each sample was run in duplicate. After the run was completed, a second derivative analysis was performed using the raw data to determine the mean Cp (Crossing point-PCR-cycle) for each sample. For each gene expression, expression of beta-actin served as an internal control. Relative mRNA expression was determined by Pfaffl analysis (EΔCp target/EΔCp reference), in which primer efficiency E = 10^(−1/slope) and ΔCp = mean Cp of sample − mean Cp of the cells treated with PBS (Control).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Extraction from Frozen Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from 50–100 mg of grounded frozen tissue specimens by the miRNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) in compliance with the supplier’s instructions. Each sample was put in 600 μL RNA lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) until complete digestion of the tissues occurred. The final extracted RNA volume was 40 µL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Extraction and DNA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of hMSC culturing on GelMPs or in GelMA, 0.2 mL/well of RNA lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added on cells and frozen down at −80 °C. Then, the samples were thawed, and DNA was quantified using the Helixyte Green dsDNA Assay Kit (AAT Bioquest, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolating RNA from Biofilm Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from biofilms was isolated using the SV Total RNA Isolation System kit (Promega). RNA was extracted from strains grown O/N at 37°C in LB and then spotted on LB-NaCl agar plates and incubated for 48 h at 30°C. Cells from each spot were then resuspended in 100 μL TE containing 50 mg/mL lysozyme and were homogenized by vortexing. Seventy-five microliter of RNA Lysis Buffer (Promega kit), followed by 350 μL RNA Dilution Buffer (Promega kit) were added to the cell suspensions, which were then mixed by inversion. Samples were incubated at 70°C for 3 min and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was mixed with 200 μL 95% ethanol and was then loaded on to the spin columns provided by the kit. The columns were washed with 600 μL RNA Wash Solution. DNase mix was prepared following the Promega kit protocol and 50 μL were directly added on the column membrane. After a 30 min incubation, 200 μL DNase Stop Solution was added and samples were centrifuged for 30 s. Columns were washed with 600 μL RNA Wash Solution followed by 250 μL RNA Wash Solution, and then centrifuged again for 1 min to dry. RNA was eluted using 100 μL of nuclease-free water. RNA quantification was performed using the Qubit RNA High Sensitivity assay kit (Q32852).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Osteogenic Differentiation of hDPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E1001(1k)-DCPD, E1001(1k)-β–TCP and E1001(1k) scaffolds seeded with hDPSCs were cultured in OM for 14 and 28 d. At each time point, RNA was harvested by lysis in 0.3 mL of RNA lysis buffer (Promega, Durham, NC). Total RNA from these lysates was purified using SV 96 Total RNA Isolation System (Promega). RNA concentration and purity were measured using TECAN Spark Nano plate (TECAN, Morrisville, NC). cDNA preparation and qPCR were performed as described in previous publication [22 (link)]. The primers used for qPCR were purchased from Qiagen (Germantown, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Tenocytes Culture in Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tenocytes (2 × 104/well) were added to each well of 48-well plates containing scaffolds. There were two sets of samples. After culturing for 24 h, the medium was removed from all samples. Fresh culture medium was added to each well and incubation continued. After 24 h, the medium was removed from each well of one set of samples. Cells in the wells were lysed with 0.2 mL/well RNA Lysis buffer (Promega, Durham, NC). The RNA lysates were stored at −80 °C. The cells in the second set of samples continued to culture, and the medium was changed every three days. On Day 7, the medium was removed from each well of the second set of samples. Cells in the wells were lysed with 0.2 mL/well RNA Lysis buffer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed using RNA lysis buffer from Promega, Leiden, the Netherlands. Total RNA was robotically isolated using Maxwell® 16 simply RNA tissue kit (Promega) and quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 UV-visible spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). RNA was reverse-transcribed and cDNA was amplified by qPCR (Bio-Rad, Veenendaal, the Netherlands). Relative gene expression compared to reference genes Ribosomal Protein L13a (RPL13A) and ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide (ATP5B) were calculated according to the standard curve method. Reference genes were selected out of 8 candidate reference genes using the “Genorm” software (Genorm; Primer Design, Southampton, UK). Primer pairs are presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!