The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

53 protocols using dig rna labelling mix

1

Synthesizing and Detecting mRNA Probes in P. tepidariorum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pt-foxQ2 antisense mRNA probes for ISHs were synthesized from the entire cloned sequence (979 bp) with the DIG RNA labelling Mix using the T7 RNA polymerase (both Roche, DIG RNA labelling Mix with Cat.-No.: 11277073910 and T7 Polymerase with Cat.-No.: 10881767001). The Pt-six3.1 and Pt-six3.2 antisense mRNA probes were those used in Schomburg et al. (2015 (link)) and are of 1439 bp and 1328 bp length, respectively. ISHs and nuclear SYTOX® Green staining in P. tepidariorum embryos were carried out as described previously (Prpic et al. 2008 (link); Pechmann and Prpic 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Probe Preparation for In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in situ hybridisation, cRNA probes for gata5, cmlc2, mck, mylz2, myod, myf5, myog, gata-1, pu.1 cmyb hbbe1, mpx, l-plastin, and rag1 were prepared as follows. cDNAs for these genes (Table 1) were amplified by RT-PCR and products cloned into pcDNA3.1 plasmids (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes were transcribed using RNA DIG labelling mix (Roche) and T7 RNA polymerase (Takara). Whole-mount in situ hybridisation was performed as described elsewhere51 (link). Probe information is presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Generating in situ Hybridization Probe for Mouse Ruvbl1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To produce an in situ hybridisation probe, a mouse Ruvbl1 cDNA clone (MmCD00533571) was sourced from the DNASU Plasmid Repository, Center for Eukaryotic Structural Genomics, University of Wisconsin Madison, USA. This was linearized by restriction digestion with ApaI (NEB). An anti-sense RNA probe was synthesised using RNA DIG labelling mix (Roche) and T7 RNA polymerase (NEB). Wild-type C3H/HeH mouse embryos were dissected in PBS at E7.5-E8.5, fixed in 4% PFA for 1 h, washed 3 times in PBS and dehydrated through a methanol series after which they were stored at − 20˚C. Following rehydration, whole-mount in situ hybridisation was performed according to standard protocols. Post-hybridisation, DIG was detected using anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase conjugated antibody (Roche, 1; 500). Expression was visualised using NBT/BCIP (Roche). Flat mounted embryos were photography using a Leica MZ16.5 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Northern Blot Analysis of Cdkn1c

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One µg of total RNAs in a denaturing buffer were run on a 1% agarose gel, transferred and chemically crosslinked to Hybond-N (GE Healthcare). 28 S RNA was detected with methylene blue. After washing, membranes were hybridized with probes in DIG Easy Hyb Granules (Sigma Aldrich) at 65 °C. The region encoding Cdkn1c in the plasmid42 (link) was transcribed with T3 promoter (antisense probe) and T7 promoter (sense probe), labeled with DIG RNA Labelling Mix (Roche) and used as probes. The images were acquired by ImageQuant LAS4000 (GE Healthcare) and quantified using ImageQuant TL (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Situ Hybridization for Transcript Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in situ hybridization experiments, tissue preparation, sectioning and transcript detection were performed as described42 (link). A MC probe was prepared using cDNA as template (393-pb fragment of Solyc05g056620.1.1) and excluding the MADS-box domain. Antisense transcripts were synthesized using the DIG RNA labelling mix (Roche Applied Science). As negative control, sense RNA probes were hybridized with the same sections and no signals were observed under the hybridization and detection conditions used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Situ Hybridization of Mannanase Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-hybridization was carried out by incubating the sections in 0.2M HCl, neutralizing them and then treating them with 1mg/ml proteinase-K (Roche Applied Science). Samples were then dehydrated in an aqueous ethanol dilution series and hybridized with sense and anti-sense digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled RNA probes, corresponding to DNA fragments (200–300bp) derived from the 3′-non coding regions of the BdMAN2, BdMAN4 and BdMAN6 genes (Supplementary Table S3), synthesized with the DIG RNA labelling mix according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Roche Applied Science). Probes were hybridized at 52ºC overnight followed by two washes in 2× SSC (150mM NaCl, 15mM Na3-citrate) and 50% formamide for 90min at the same temperature. Incubation with the alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody (Roche Applied Science) and colour detection was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Ferrandiz et al., 2000 (link)). Sections were dried and examined on a Zeiss Axiophot Microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were captured and processed with the Leica Application Suite 2.8.1 build software (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ddx3x mRNA Expression Mapping in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ hybridization was performed as described in Moldrich et al, 2010. The Ddx3x riboprobe was generated in-house using the primers corresponding to those used in the Allen Developing Mouse Brain Atlas (Website: © 2015 Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen Developing Mouse Brain Atlas [Internet]). Available from: http://developingmouse.brain-map.org): Forward primer: 5’ AAGGGAGCTCAAGGTCACAA 3’, Reverse primer: 5’ CCTGCTGCATAATTCTTCC 3’. Using mouse cortex cDNA, these primers were used to amplify a 908 base pair fragment. This fragment was purified and cloned into pGEM00ae-T Vector System (Promega). The plasmid was then linearized (SacII restriction enzyme, New England BioLabs), purified (PCR Clean up Kit, Qiagen), transcribed (Sp6 RNA Polymerase, New England BioLabs) and digoxigenin-labelled (DIG RNA labelling Mix, Roche) to generate the riboprobe. In situ hybridization against Ddx3x mRNA was performed on 20 μm cryostat sections for embryonic stages and 50 μm vibratome sections for postnatal brains in wildtype CD1 mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gene-specific primer design and probe synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene-specific primers (Additional File 6: Table S5) were designed using Primer3 [177 (link)] implemented in Geneious v.8 (Biomatters) against predicted gene model sequences. Parameters were set to produce optimal product sizes of 1–1.5 Kb and to anneal at least 50 bp internally from the ends to increase their efficiency in cases where template cDNAs were not full length. Transcripts were amplified by PCR from cDNAs synthesised from total RNA purified from either Whole Adult or pooled, larval worms. Products were cloned using a StrataClone PCR cloning kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, except that all volumes were halved. Transformed plaques were picked and added to 500 μl water, heated to 80 °C to liberate the plasmids, and the resulting mixture used as template for further amplification by PCR using M13 primers. Resulting products (consisting of the gene insert flanked by T3/T7 reverse transcriptase promoter regions and M13 priming sites) were cleaned, quantified and used as templates for probe synthesis. Digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled riboprobes were synthesised from both the sense (+) and anti-sense (−) strands using T3 and T7 reverse transcriptases and DIG-RNA labelling mix (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcription and In Situ Hybridization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Shh probes were transcribed from a plasmid described by Echelard et al. (1993) (link), by means of in vitro transcription with the incorporation of digoxigenin-ddUTP, using a premixed DIG RNA labelling mix (Roche). In situ hybridisation was performed with a conventional protocol. The antibody utilised was an anti-DIG antibody coupled with alkaline phosphatase (Roche); the chromogenic substrate used was BM Purple ready-to-use NBT/BCIP (Roche). Samples were examined with Leica M205 stereomicroscope. Images were taken with the Leica Application Suite 4.1 software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification and Characterization of Tardigrade Transcripts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA was synthesized with MMLV reverse transcriptase (Evrogen) from total RNA extracted from larvae with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Scientific). Primers specific for the 543 bp fragment were designed based on full-length transcript from the H. dujardini transcriptome (F: 5′-CAGTTCAACGACGAGATTTG-3′; R: 5′-CCTGAAAGATGTGCCTTTG-3′). The fragment was cloned in pAL-2T vector (Evrogen). Inserts were verified by Sanger sequencing and used for probe synthesis. Antisense digoxigenin-labelled RNA probe was made by in vitro transcription with DIG RNA labelling mix (Roche) and an appropriate RNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific). WMISH of the larvae was performed as described [20 (link)]. Alkaline phosphatase-labelled probe was visualized with the NBT/BCIP colorimetric substrate system (Roche).
To confirm the existence of different transcripts, cloning was performed as follows. cDNA was synthesized with random primers from total RNA. Primers were designed in such a way as to amplify CDS and at least part of both 5′ and 3′ UTRs (electronic supplementary material, file S2). PCR was carried out with theTersus Plus PCR kit (Evrogen). PCR products were cloned in pAL2-T plasmid (Evrogen) and subjected to Sanger sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!