The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using sonic 6d

1

Determination of Organic Acids and Sugars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The organic acid and sugar content was determined using the method proposed previously by Wojdyło et al.30 (link) by HPLC–PDA (Waters Co.; Milford, CT, USA) and HPLC-ELSD (PL-ELS 1000; Merck; Hitachi, Japan), respectively. The sample (approx. 3 g of fruits and 1 g of leaves) mixed with distilled water, sonicated (Sonic 6D; Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) for 15 min and boiled for 30 min, finally sample was centrifuged (MPW-55; Warsaw, Poland) at 12,000xg for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was applied onto the Sep-Pak C-18 (1 g, Millipore Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and finally eluted by water to Eppendorf tubes. The extract before analysis was filtered through 0.20 μm hydrophilic PTFE membrane (Millex Simplicity Filter; Merck, Germany). All samples were assayed in triplicate repetition. Results expressed as g per 100 g dry weight (dw).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrasound-Assisted Polyphenol Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyphenolic compounds were isolated by means of extraction supported by ultrasounds. First, 0.5 g of the finely ground material was placed in a Falcon centrifuge tube (50 mL), to which 50% aqueous methanol containing formic acid (1%) was poured. The extraction was performed twice by incubation for 20 min under sonication (Sonic 6D, Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) and with occasional shaking. Next, the slurry was centrifuged at 19,000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a Hydrophilic PTFE 0.20 μm membrane (Millex Samplicity Filter, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and used for analysis. The content of polyphenols in individual extracts was determined by means of the UPLC-PDA-MS/MS method [31 (link)]. All extractions were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Polyphenol Extraction and Analysis in Fruit Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol extracts for determination of polyphenolic compounds were prepared as follows: The freeze-dried powder of fruits (~1 g) was vortexed for 1 min with 6 mL methanol/water/acetic acid/ascorbic acid (30:68:1:1, v/v/v/m), sonicated for 20 min (Sonic 6D; Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) and left for 24 hours at 4 °C. Then, the extract was sonicated again for 20 min, and centrifuged at 19.000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Finally, the extract was filtred by 0.20 μm hydrophilic PTFE membrane (Millex Simplicity Filter; Merck, Germany) and used for phenolic compounds identification by LC-PDA-QTOF-ESI-MS and quantification by UPLC-PDA. For the determination of antioxidant and in vitro biological activities, the same protocol as that described above was used, but a methanol/water (80:20, v/v) with 1% hydrochloric acid mixture was used for extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extraction and Evaluation of Antioxidant Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lyophilized powdered sample (approx. 1 g for fruits and 0.5 g for leaves) was taken for the determination of biological in vitro activity. The sample was mixed with 7 mL of methanol:water: 37% hydrochloric acid (80:19:1, v/v/w), sonicated for 20 min (Sonic 6D; Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) and incubated overnight (4 °C). Next, after 24 h, the slurry was centrifuged (MPW-55; Warsaw, Poland) at 19,000× g at 4 °C for 10 min to obtain extract for all biological in vitro analysis.
ABTS and FRAP were performed using UV-2401 PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu; Kyoto, Japan), and the remaining assays were performed using a Synergy H1 microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). All tests were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extraction and Analysis of Iridoids and Polyphenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried powdered samples of roots and leaves were extracted with 50% methanol. The extraction was performed twice via an incubation for 20 min under sonication with shaking (Sonic 6D, Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland), then the sample was centrifuged at 19,000× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a hydrophilic PTFE 0.20 μm membrane (Millex Samplicity Filter, Merck, Darmstadt Germany) before analysis. The content of iridoids and polyphenolics was determined by means of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detector-mass spectrometry (UPLC-PDA-QTof-MS/MS) method. All extractions were carried out in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Hydrogel Beads Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to prepare the stock solution, the method described by Kopjar et al. [20 (link)], with slight modifications, was used. 1 g of hydrogel beads was dissolved in 5 mL of 80% methanol acidified with HCl. The samples were placed in an ultrasonic bath (Sonic 6D, Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) for 15 min at 20 °C and then placed in a refrigerator for 24 h. After this time, extracts were centrifuged at 3600 rpm for 20 min, and the supernatants were filtered through a hydrophilic PTFE 0.20 µm membrane (Millex Samplicity Filter, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Polyphenol-rich Apricot Leaf Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain an extract rich in polyphenols of P. armeniaca L. leaf powder after freeze-drying was mixed with 50% ethanol, sonicated for 20 min (Sonic 6D; Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland), occasionally mixed, and supernatant was separated by centrifuged for 10 min at 19,000× g (MPW-55; Warsaw, Poland). The residue was reextracted 3–4 times and all obtained fractions were mixed and ethanol was evaporated at 40 °C by a scale rotary evaporator (Hei-VAP Expert, Heidolph; Schwabach, Germany). The obtained aqueous fraction was loaded into a glass column (50 cm; Ø 6 cm) filled with Amberlite polymeric XAD-16 resin previously washed with water. The absorbed aqueous fraction was washed with water (1 mL/min) to remove sugars, organic acids or other ballast substances and then polyphenolic compounds were eluted with ethanol (80 and 100%; 1 mL/min). Collected fractions were mixed and, after evaporation (Hei-VAP Expert, Heidolph; Schwabach, Germany) of alcohol at 40 °C, the obtained fraction was freeze-dried to obtain the powder of polyphenol-rich apricot leaf extract (PrALe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenolic Acid Extraction from Plant Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, 0.2 g of plant material was extracted with 15 mL of 80% MeOH for 30 min using an ultrasonic bath (Sonic-6D, Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland). The extract was then centrifuged at 5000× g for 30 min. The supernatant was collected and evaporated under a vacuum at 40 °C (Hei-VAP Precision, Heidolph Instruments GmbH & Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany). The residue was suspended in water and applied onto an SPE (solid phase extraction) column, equilibrated with water. SPE was carried out with a Visiprep™ SPE Vacuum Manifold (Sigma-Aldrich, Poznan, Poland), using a Chromabond C18ec column (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Dueren, Germany). The column was washed with H2O and the phenolic acids were eluted with methanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antioxidant Capacity of Rye Bread Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rye bread (1 g) was mixed with 80% of methanol and water (10 mL) + 1% hydrochloric acid, and incubated for 20 min under sonication (Sonic 6D, Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland). Next, the slurry was centrifuged at 19,000× g for 10 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a hydrophilic PTFE 0.20 μm membrane (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and used for analysis.
The ABTS method was performed according to the method described by Re et al. [22 (link)]. ABTS•+ was generated by oxidation of ABTS with potassiumpersulphate. The ABTS•+ solution was diluted to an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.05 at 734 nm. Then, 0.03 mL of extract was mixed with 2.97 mL of ABTS•+ solution and left for 6 min at 25 °C. Next, the absorbance was measured at 734 nm using the UV-2401 PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The results of antiradical capacity were expressed as Trolox equivalents in µmol per g d.s.
The DPPH method was carried out with the method described by Yen and Chen [23 (link)]. Then, 0.50 mL of extract was mixed with ethanol (1.5 mL) and DPPH•+ solution (0.5 mL), and left for 10 min at 25 °C. Next, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using the UV-2401 PC spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The results of antiradical activity were expressed as Trolox equivalents in µmol per g d.s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Organic Acids and Carbohydrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis of organic acids and carbohydrate was performed as described previously by Wojdyło et al. [14 (link)], using HPLC-PDA (Waters Co.; Milford, CT, USA) and HPLC-ELSD (PL-ELS 1000; Merck; Hitachi, Japan), respectively. The sample (approximately 3 g of fruit) was mixed with distilled water, exposed to ultrasounds (Sonic 6D; Polsonic, Warsaw, Poland) for 15 min, heated at 90–100 °C for 30 min, and finally centrifuged (MPW-55; Warsaw, Poland) at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (2.5 mL) was injected into a Sep-Pak C-18 cartridge (1 g, Millipore Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and eluted with H2O into Eppendorf tubes. Before analysis, the extract was filtered through a hydrophilic PTFE membrane (0.20 µm; Millex Simplicity filters; Merck, Germany). The organic acids were analyzed on Polymex IEX H column (8 μm, 250 × 8 mm, Watrex; Prague, Czech Republic) using isocratic elution with 0.9 M sulfuric acid in H2O for 20 min. The carbohydrates were analyzed on Alltech® PrevailTM Carbohydrate ES HPLC Column-W 250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm (Columbia, MD, USA) using isocratic elution with 70% acetonitrile in H2O for 20 min. The results were expressed in g per 100 g of d.w.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!