The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tcs sp5 aobs

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany, Japan

The Leica TCS SP5 AOBS is a confocal laser scanning microscope system. It features an Acousto-Optical Beam Splitter (AOBS) for flexible control of laser excitation. The system allows for high-resolution imaging and analysis of biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

106 protocols using tcs sp5 aobs

1

Osteoclast-Derived EVs Internalized by DRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Osteoclast-derived EV (or PBS as negative control) were labelled with PKH26 0.5 μM dye (Sigma-Aldrich), for 5 min at RT, and washed in VivaSpin® centrifugal columns (10 kDa cut-off). Labelled EV were added to the axonal compartment of DRG in microfluidic devices, at the same concentration present in the total osteoclast secretome (1011 EV/mL). Internalization was followed live for 120 min at laser scanning confocal microscopy (Leica TCS-SP5 AOBS) with controlled environment (temperature and CO2). Samples were fixed and analyzed after 24 h exposure.
DRG exposed to osteoclast-derived EV were stained against calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP). Briefly, after fixation, permeabilization and blocking as previous mentioned, cells were incubated with the primary antibody directed against CGRP (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted 1:8000, in blocking solution, overnight at 4 °C. Afterward, cells were washed and incubated for 1 h at RT with the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488, Invitrogen) diluted 1:1000, in blocking solution. Images were acquired at laser scanning confocal microscopy (Leica TCS-SP5 AOBS). To quantify the percentage of EV internalization, neurites were semi-automatically traced with simple neurite tracer plug in for Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Probing Cell Mechanics via Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each PDMS membrane was attached to a stretch apparatus (custom made by Deben UK Limited) fixed securely to the stage of a Leica TCS SP5 AOBS upright confocal and a 0.5mm (to remove sag on the membrane) or 8.6mm uniaxial stretch was applied for unstretched and stretched samples respectively. Images were collected on a Leica TCS SP5 AOBS upright confocal using a 20x/0.50 HCX Apo U-V-I (W (Dipping Lens)) objective and 2x confocal zoom. The distance between optical sections was maintained at 5 μm and the time interval between each frame was 20 s, with each sample being imaged for up to 2.5 hours. For quantification of β-catenin-GFP and GFP-LGN localization, animal caps were prepared as described but timelapse movies were collected with 2μm optical sections and a time interval of 1 minute between frames. Maximum intensity projections of these 3D stacks are shown in the results; except for the GFP-LGN timelapse (Figure 4G), which is an average intensity projection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Imaging of GLUT1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described [6 (link), 7 (link)], cells grown on glass coverslips were exposed for 18 h to the different treatments, fixed with acetone at −20 °C and blocked in a PBS solution containing 1 % BSA and 0.1 % Triton X-100. The cells were then incubated with a primary polyclonal antibody against GLUT1 (dilution 1/50; Neomarkers, Fremont, CA, USA), followed by incubation with an appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-secondary antibody (dilution 1/200; Molecular Probes-Invitrogen Corporation). Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Cells were observed with an Eclipse TE300 epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and a spectral confocal microscope (Leica TCSSP5-AOBS, Leica microsystems, Heidelberg, GMBH, Germany). Confocal images were analyzed with LAS AF software, version 1.5.1 Build 869 (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescent Labeling of RNase Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNase3, RNase6, and RNase7 were labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 Labeling kit (Invitrogen, A10235), following the manufacturer′s instruction as previously described (21 (link)). To 0.5 mL of 2 mg/mL protein solution in PBS, 50 μL of 1 M sodium bicarbonate, pH 8.3, was added. The protein was incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the reactive dye, with stirring, and the labeled protein was separated from the free dye by PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare, 17-0851-01). Labeled protein distribution in cell cultures was followed by confocal microscopy. About 2.5 × 105 RAW cells were harvested in 3 cm diameter microscopy plates (MatTek, P35G-1.5-14-C) 2–3 h before the assay. Macrophages were washed with RPMI and labeled with Hoescht 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 62249) and Cell Mask Deep Red Plasma membrane Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, C10046) at 0.5 μg/mL for 5–10 min before observation in Leica TCS SP5 AOBS equipped with a PL APO 63 × 1.4–0.6 CS oil immersion objective (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany). Following, Alexa Fluor labeled proteins were added at 2 μM to the cultures and time lapse was recorded at intervals of 30 s for 30 min. Fluorochromes were excited by 405 nm (Hoechst 33342), 649 nm (CellMask Deep Red), and 488 nm (Alexa Fluor 488). Emissions were collected with a HyD detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Retina Whole-Mount Immunostaining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Retina whole-mounts were prepared according to the procedure previously described.13 (link) Retinas were stained with mouse anti-rat CD45 (1:50, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), AlexaFluor 488–labeled isolectin B4 (IB4) from Griffonia simplicifolia (1:75, Life Technologies) and 10 μg/mL Hoechst-33342 DNA stain (Life Technologies). Retinas were visualized under a confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5 AOBS; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Eight animals per group were used and from each retina eight fields were averaged and used to determine the number of CD45-positive cells in a masked fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Widefield and Confocal Imaging of hTCEpi Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Widefield fluorescence microscopy images of hTCEpi cells were collected on a Nikon Inverted TE2000i (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) microscope using a 20×/0.50 Plan FLN objective, Cascade II camera (Photometrics, Tuscon, AZ, USA) and controlled using NIS-elements software (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Confocal images were collected on a Leica TCS SP5 AOBS (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) upright confocal using a 63×/0.90 water-dipping objective and 3× zoom. The confocal settings were as follows, pinhole 1 airy unit, scan speed 400 Hz unidirectional. Images were acquired using sequential scanning and appropriate laser and filter settings for each channel to ensure that there was no bleed through between fluorescent channels. The images were collected sequentially to eliminate cross-talk between channels. An optical section was acquired every 1 µm. Images were processed with Image J software or Leica Application Suite Advanced Fluorescence software (version 3.1.0) (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Only the orthogonal views of these 3D stacks are shown in the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Metabolic Activity and Cell Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The metabolic activity of embedded cells was assessed using the resazurin assay through incubation of cell-laden gels in DMEM medium containing 20% v/v resazurin sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h at 37 °C. Samples were measured using a microplate reader (Synergy MX, Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA) at 530 nm (excitation) and 590 nm (emission). To evaluate cell morphology and fibronectin deposition in the dermis, cell-laden hydrogels were fixed in 4% v/v paraformaldehyde (PFA, Electron Microscopy Sciences) in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 30 min, followed by HBSS washing. Samples were permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.1% v/v, 10 min, Sigma-Aldrich) in HBSS and were washed and incubated in blocking solution (1% w/v bovine serum albumin, BSA, Irving, TX, USA) for 1 h. Then, samples were incubated overnight at 4 °C with phalloidin/Alexa Fluor 488 (1:40, Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA) and rabbit anti-fibronectin antibody (1:400, F3648, Sigma-Aldrich). Afterward, samples were rinsed with HBSS and incubated for 45 min with Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen) and Hoechst for nuclei staining. Finally, samples were rinsed and confocal images were acquired using a laser scanning microscope (CLSM, Leica TCS-SP5 AOBS, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spectral Confocal Microscopy for Cell Membrane Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After treatment and washing, carried out as described in Section 2.6., cells were stained with CellMask™ Orange Plasma Membrane Stain (dilution 1:20 in PBS) for 5 min at 37 °C, fixed with PFA 2% for 15 min, and then stained with DAPI (100 ng/mL) 15 min at room temperature in the dark. A double washing with PBS followed each passage. At the end, coverslips were mounted onto clean slides and maintained at 4 °C in the dark. The analysis was made by Spectral Confocal Microscope Leica TCS-SP5 AOBS, Leica Microsystems (Wetzlar, Germany) using a 63× HCX PL APO CS oil objective and performing Z stacks (zoom of 1.0). Images were acquired by setting the pinhole at 95.5 μm, the image size of 512 × 512 pixels, 8 bits of resolution and a bidirectional scanning speed at 400 Hz. DAPI, FITC-labeled NPs, and the CellMask™ Orange Plasma Membrane Stain were excited by a 405 Diode UV, an argon, and a DPSS 561 laser, respectively. Untreated cells were used as a control to adjust the gain of each detector and remove the green autofluorescence of the cells. Using the same adjusted settings, a Z-stack of all treated samples was performed with a step size of 0.5 µm (20–30 slices per each image). Images were treated through ImageJ 1.48 V Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence analysis on tumor cells and tissues was performed as described [23 (link),24 (link)]. Staining was carried out with the following primary antibodies: anti-αSMA (ab5694), anti-TNC (ab108930), and anti-Collagen-I (ab34710) all from Abcam (Cambridge, UK), and revealed by Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody. All images were captured with a Leica TCS SP5 AOBS confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Immunofluorescence acquisition settings were kept constant within each cell line or tumor tissue. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was evaluated with ImageJ software, measuring the mean pixel intensity in each channel, background subtracted. MFI was normalized on DAPI tumors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Muscle Fiber Characteristics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measures of fiber typing and IMCL were performed as previously described using immunofluorescence techniques (14 (link)). Images were taken using a multiphoton confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5 AOBS; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and Type I fibers were counted. IMCL was determined using the Sigma Scan Pro 5 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) by delineating BODIPY staining within the myofibers. Glycogen content was measured using periodic acid–Schiff staining and analyzed using the Sigma Scan Pro 5 software (2 (link)). For all histology measures, three cross-sectional slices were obtained within the tissue. Not less than 50 fibers were assessed from each cross-sectional slice for IMCL content, fiber type, and glycogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!