The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fastrak 3d digitizer

Manufactured by Polhemus
Sourced in United States

The Fastrak 3D digitizer is a motion tracking system developed by Polhemus. It is designed to capture and record the position and orientation of objects in 3D space.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using fastrak 3d digitizer

1

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired fNIRS data using a continuous 3-wavelength fNIRS LABNIRS 67ch system with a whole head holder (Shimadzu, Japan). We arranged optodes that provided 54 channels to measure not only the forehead region but also the dorsolateral prefrontal region, parietal lobe, and somatosensory region using the following locations of the 10–20 system: P3, P4, F3, and F4 coordinates with the time-divided method (33 ms/point) (Fig. 4). We digitized each participant’s channel position using the Fastrak 3D digitizer (Polhemus, US) with input to the standard brain model and Montreal Neurological Institute coordinate outputs using the NIRS-SPM software Ver. 4 (Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Korea) to obtain the brain anatomical information from the measurement channel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Infant MEG Data Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were recorded in a magnetically shielded room with a whole head adult-sized 306 channel Elekta Neuromag® MEG system (Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Using Fastrak® 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA), we digitized three anatomical landmarks (left and right preauricular points, nasion) to construct an individual Cartesian head-centric coordinate system, five HPI coils and about 100 additional points along the head surface. Data collection began when infants were seated calmly in a custom-made chair under the MEG helmet (Fig. 1b). Research assistants entertained infants with silent toys while a silent video of baby faces was played in the background. MEG data were recorded with an analog band-pass filter of 0.03–330 Hz and a sampling rate of 1.2 kHz. Positions of infants’ heads relative to the sensor array were tracked continuously by extracting the magnetic fields emitted by HPI coils at frequencies between 83 and 323 Hz. Any channels with amplitudes below a certain level were considered ‘flat’, removed (grad = 1e-13, mag = 1e-15), and reconstructed with the signal space separation (SSS) method (Taulu et al., 2005 ) during preprocessing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Neurophysiological Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five head position indicator (HPI) coils will be attached to the participant’s scalp to measure and follow head position with respect to the MEG sensors. Positions of the HPI coils, three anatomical landmarks (nasion, left and right preauricular points), and ~ 150 additional points on the head surface will be determined with a Fastrak 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Vermont, USA). Vertical and horizontal electro-oculograms will be recorded with two pairs of electrodes. The first pair is placed above and below the right eye and the second pair lateral to the outer canthi of the eyes. Electrocardiography will be recorded with a pair of electrodes placed 3–5 cm bellow right and left clavicle and with 8–12 cm inter-electrode distance. The ground electrode will be placed on the right clavicle. EMG activity will be recorded from Sol, MG and TA muscles (EMG setup 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MEG Data Preprocessing and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG was recorded continuously from a 306 triple sensor (204 planar gradiometers; 102 magnetometers) whole-head system (Elekta Neuromag, Helsinki, Finland) using a sampling rate of 1 kHz and an online band-bass filter between 0.1 and 300 Hz. The headshape of each individual participant was measured using a Polhemus FASTRAK 3D digitizer. Head position of the subject was recorded continuously using five localization coils (forehead, mastoids).
Data pre-processing was performed using the open-source Matlab toolbox Fieldtrip (www.fieldtriptoolbox.org; RRID:SCR_004849). First the continuous data were filtered (high-pass Butterworth filter at 1 Hz, low-pass Butterworth filter at 170 Hz, and DFT filter at 50, 100, and 150 Hz to remove line-noise artefacts in the signal), and downsampled to 256 Hz. Next, the data were epoched into segments of 1 s for subsequent analysis.
Rejection of trials containing artefacts and bad channels was performed using a semi-automatic procedure. First, outliers were rejected using a pre-screening based on the variance and range in each trial/channel. Then, algorithmically guided visual inspection of the raw data was performed to remove any remaining sources of noise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Magnetoencephalography Protocol for Cognitive Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were acquired with a 306-channel Neuromag VectorView system (Elekta-Neuromag Oy, Helsinki, Finland), which combines the focal sensitivity of 204 first-order planar gradiometers with the widespread sensitivity of 102 magnetometers. Eye movements and blinks were monitored with vertical and horizontal electrooculogram (EOG). The location of the head with respect to the sensors was determined using four head-position indicator coils attached to the scalp. A head-based MEG coordinate frame was established by locating fiduciary landmarks (nasion and preauricular points) with a Fastrak 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT). The data were digitized at 600 samples/second with an anti-aliasing low-pass filter set at 200 Hz.
MEG signals were averaged across trials for each condition, time-locked to the onset of the stimulus. A 34-ms delay between the time the computer sent an image and the time it was projected onto the screen was measured with a photodiode and subsequently taken into account when reporting the timing of measured activity. A 200-ms pre-stimulus period served as baseline. Trials to which subjects made an incorrect response and those that contained eye blinks exceeding 150 μV in peak-to-peak EOG amplitude or other artifacts were discarded from the average. The evoked responses were low-pass filtered at 40 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Magnetoencephalography Data Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were recorded at a sampling rate of 1 kHz with a 306-channel (204 first order planar gradiometer, 102 magnetometers) whole-head VectorView MEG system (Elekta-Neuromag Ltd., Helsinki, Finland). Participants sat in a magnetically shielded room (AK3B, Vakuumschmelze, Hanau, Germany). The MEG signal was band-pass filtered in the frequency range of 0.01–330 Hz by accordingly adjusted hardware filters. Prior to the experiment head position indicator (HPI), coils were attached to the scalp of participants, and the head shape and landmarks like nasion, inion, Cz, left and right ear canal of participants were digitized using a Fastrak 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA, http://www.polhemus.com, last accessed on 9 September 2015). During the experiment, participants were comfortably seated under the MEG helmet and instructed to keep the head still and avoid movements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-Throughput 3D Maize Shoot Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The field experiment was conducted in 2018 at the experimental field of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (39°56′ N, 116°16′ E), to evaluate the performance of the proposed geometric modelling method. Four cultivars, including Aidan268 (AD268), Demeiya2 (DMY2), Jingke968 (JK968) and Zhengdan958 (ZD958), were selected and planted on 4th June at six plants per square metre, and row distance of 60 cm. Three shoots of each cultivar with representative morphometrics were selected at each growth stage (V6, V9, V13 and R1) for evaluation (Abendroth et al. 2011 ). A high-throughput phenotyping platform MVS-Pheno was used to obtain multi-view images of the selected shoots, and 3D point clouds were reconstructed (Wu et al. 2020 ). Morphological parameters were then obtained through skeleton extraction (Wu et al. 2019 (link)), and used to construct the maize shoot and population models. The phytomer number of each shoot was then determined. Fastrak 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA) was used following the data acquisition standards to obtain 3D template data of all shoot phytomers, including skeletons and meshes. The templates were then added to the resource database. In addition, the leaf length and width of all the shoot phytomers were measured to validate the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Infant Magnetoencephalography Data Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG data were acquired inside a magnetically shielded room with a whole-head, adult-sized 306 channel Elekta Neuromag® MEG system (Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland). Three anatomical landmarks (left and right preauricular points, nasion), five HPI coils, and approximately 100 additional points were digitized along the head surface using Fastrak® 3D digitizer (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA) in order to construct an individual Cartesian head-centric coordinate system. Once the infant was seated calmly in a custom-made chair under the MEG helmet (Figure 1b), MEG data recording began with an analog band-pass filter of 0.03–330 Hz and a sampling rate of 1.2 kHz. During recording, infants were entertained with silent toys while a silent video of baby faces was played in the background. Infants’ head positions in relation to the sensor array were tracked continuously by extracting the magnetic fields emitted by HPI coils at frequencies between 83 and 323 Hz. Any channels with amplitudes lower than a certain level were marked as “flat”, removed (grad = 1 × 10−13; mag = 1 × 10−15), and reconstructed by applying the signal space separation (SSS) method [51 (link)] during preprocessing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!