The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

50 protocols using infinicyt software

1

Immunophenotyping of Cell Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were immunophenotyped using a direct immunofluorescence stain-and-then-lyse technique, based on the EuroFlow standard operating procedures (SOP) for staining of cell surface markers only [27 (link),28 (link),29 ], with modifications described below for the different conditions tested during optimization of the TRBC1 assay. Immediately after completion of sample preparation, stained cells were measured in FACSCanto II or LSRFortessa X-20 flow cytometers (Becton/Dickinson Biosciences (BD), San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with the FACSDivaTM software (BD), or in a 5-laser Cytek® Aurora spectral flow cytometer (Cytek Biosciences, Fremont, CA, USA), using the SpectroFlo® software (Cytek Biosciences, Fremont, CA, USA). Instrument setup, calibration and daily quality control, as well as monitoring, were performed according to well-established EuroFlow protocols [28 (link),29 ]. For data analysis, the INFINICYTTM software (Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive T-cell Subset Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry data files were analyzed using the InfinicytTM software (Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain). The following percentages were calculated: lymphocytes (among white blood cells, WBC); Tc (among lymphocytes and among WBC); γδ Tc (among total Tc and among WBC); Vδ1, Vδ2 and Vγ9 Tc (among γδ Tc and among WBC); CD5+, CD8+, CD16+, CD28+ and CD56+ Tc (among γδ Tc, and among Vδ1, Vδ2 and Vγ9 Tc). In addition, the median fluorescence intensities (MedFI) of CD3, TCR-γδ, CD5, CD8, CD16, CD28 and CD56 expression were evaluated in each cell population: γδ Tc and αβ Tc (i.e., TCR-γδ negative Tc), and Vδ1, Vδ2 and Vγ9 Tc.
The strategy used for cell gating and analysis is depicted in Figure 1.
Absolute counts of total Tc, γδ Tc and Vδ1; Vδ2; and Vγ9 Tc, expressed as numbers of cells/μL, were calculated using a dual platform method, in which total WBC counts were obtained from the hematology analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Anticancer Properties of WIN-55 Explored

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lines were cultured (5 × 105 cells/well) at the indicated concentrations of WIN-55 or DMSO in triplicate wells for 18, 48 and 72 h. Isolated primary cells were cultured (5 × 105 cells/well) for 18 h with DMSO (control) or WIN-55 with or without CB antagonists. WIN-55 was added at different concentrations and time-points. Cell viability was determined by Cell Counting Kit (CCK-8) assay as per manufacturer’s instructions (Dojindo Molecular Technologies). Optical densities were measured at 450 nm using a plate reader MultiskanTM Go Microplate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
AML cells from patients’ BM were identified at diagnosis with a combination of monoclonal antibodies against AML cells-associated antigens at diagnosis (anti-CD33, anti-CD34, anti-CD117, and anti-CD45 [BD Biosciences]). Apoptosis was assessed by Annexin V/7AAD staining assay kit, as per manufacturer’s instructions (BD Biosciences) and analysed on a FACS Canto II Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analysed with InfinicytTM Software (Cytognos, Spain).
Other studies, such as oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), western blot, mitochondrial damage or enzyme activity assays are detailed in the supplementary files.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multi‐parameter flow cytometry was performed using a Fortessa cytometer (Becton Dickinson; BD; San Jose, CA, USA) with strictly harmonized baseline settings as described.19 In brief, cryopreserved cells were thawed, washed with phosphate‐buffered saline and stained with the appropriate antibodies (Table S1). At least 200 000 events were recorded and data were analyzed using either Kaluza software (Beckman Coulter, USA) or by merging all panels using the Infinicyt software (Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain).
For enrichment of residual cells of remission samples, phycoerythrin (PE)‐labeled antibodies targeting CLL‐1, TIM‐3, CD117, and CD123, along with the backbone markers CD45, CD34 and CD38 were used (Table S2). After excluding CD14+ monocytes and CD203c+ basophils, the mononuclear cells were sorted into PE positive and PE negative fractions using a FACS Aria II (Becton Dickinson). Purity of the sorted fractions was >95%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of CLL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunophenotypic studies were performed on erythrocytelyzed PB samples, using a high-sensitive multicolor flow cytometry approach, previously described in detail.18 (link) For this purpose, PB white blood cells (WBC) were systematically stained with the monoclonal antibody (MAb) combinations detailed in Online Supplementary Table S1. For flow cytometry data analysis, the INFINICYT™ software (Cytognos S.L., Salamanca, Spain) was used. All cases showed a clonal-imbalanced surface membrane (Sm) immunoglobulin (Ig)-kappa: SmIg-lambda ratio of >3:1 or <1:319 (link) and/or an aberrant CD5+ CLL(-like) B-cell population. The minimum number of clustered events required to define an abnormal B-cell population was 50 cells or more.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometry Analysis of GBM Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FACSDiva™ software (BD Biosciences) was used for the acquisition of data on ≥106 events/tube. For data analysis, the Infinicyt software (Cytognos, SL) was employed. During data analysis, the percent distribution of each cell population in the sample together with its phenotype —percent of positive cells and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) per marker— were recorded. The small fraction of residual normal astrocytic cells in the tumor tissue specimens (non‐tumoral non‐hematopoietic tissue cells) could not be clear cut identified and discriminated from the GBM cells coexisting in the same sample; thereby, they were systematically included within the percentage of non‐hematopoietic (tumor) cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized AML Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each AML case, we requested that the participating center upload the anonymized flow cytometry standard (FCS) files (raw data from the EuroFlow AML panel) to the secured EuroFlow server. In addition, the participating laboratories performed a basic analysis on merged FCS files (removal of debris/doublets and identification of lymphocytes) using only the backbone markers (allowing a uniform analysis across tubes) (Infinicyt software, Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain). The resulting analyzed (CYT) file was also uploaded to the secured server. In addition, a spreadsheet with patient annotations (e.g., age, gender, WHO classification and flow cytometer used) was requested. Finally, each CYT file was checked by an independent reviewer to make sure all cells were gated correctly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

MSC Phenotypic Characterization by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSC phenotypes, as defined in the ISCT minimal criteria [11 (link)], were tested by flow cytometry. MSCs (~106 cells) were harvested, resuspended in PBS, and incubated with conjugated antibodies using the following panel: CD90-FITC, CD14-PE, CD45-PerCP/CD34-FITP, CD73-PE, HLA-DR-PerCP/CD44-FITC, 166-PE, CD19-PerCP, CD105-APC/CD11b-FITC, CD33-PE, 7AAD-PerCP (FITC: fluorescein isothiocyanate, PE: phycoerythrin, PerCP: peridinin chlorophyll protein, APC: allophycocyanin; Becton Dickinson Biosciences). 100,000 cell events per culture were acquired in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) connected to the CellQuest program (BD Biosciences). Fluorescence-based expression of CD markers per event was analysed using Infinicyt software (Cytognos).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Regulatory T Cells and Dendritic Cells Analysis in EAE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleen and lymph nodes (popliteal + inguinal) cells were collected and the red blood cells were lysed with buffer containing NH4Cl. For regulatory T cells analysis, spleen, lymph nodes and CNS-isolated cells were incubated with 0.5 μg of FITC labeled anti-mouse CD4 (clone GK1.5) and 0.25 μg of APC labeled anti-mouse CD25 (clone PC61.5) for 20 min at room temperature. Intracellular Foxp3 transcription factor was detected using Foxp3 PE Staining Set (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions. For DCs analysis, splenocytes were incubated with 0.25 μg of FITC labeled anti-mouse CD11c (clone N418), 0.03 μg of APC labeled anti-mouse MHCII (clone M5/114.15.2) and 0.125 μg of PE labeled anti-mouse CD86 (clone GL1) for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were then washed, resuspended in flow cytometry buffer and fixed in paraformaldehyde 1%. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using the FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Regulatory T cells and DCs analyses were performed by FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, EUA) and Infinicyt software (Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain), respectively. These experiments were performed 18 days after EAE induction except Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) evaluation in the spleen and lymph nodes that was also assessed at the preclinical phase.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Integrin and CAR Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells of GS102, GS289, GS79 and GS245 were seeded in 6-well plates at 5x104 cells per well and treated with Scriptaid (0.5 and 1.5μM) or with LBH589 (5nM, 15nM, or 45nM). The cells were harvested after 6 and 24 hours, were washed and incubated for 15 minutes with FACS buffer (PBS/0.25% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/0.05% NaN3/0.5mM Ethylene-di-amine-tetra-acetic acid (EDTA)/2% human serum) containing primary antibodies against integrin αvβ3 (mouse anti-CD51/CD61, 1:50, Abcam) and CAR (rabbit anti-CAR, H-300, 1:50, Santa Cruz). After washing with FACS buffer, the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies Alexa-488 anti-rabbit and PE-anti mouse (Life Technologies). After staining and fixing with BD FACS lysing buffer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California) a minimum of 3x104 events were acquired on a FACS Canto II (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, California). The analysis of the flow cytometry data was done using Infinicyt software (Cytognos, Salamanca, Spain). Debris and doublets were removed using FSC-H and FSC-A after which expression was plotted for the remaining events.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!