The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Blue s green qpcr kit

Manufactured by Biozym
Sourced in Germany

The Blue S'Green qPCR Kit is a real-time PCR reagent designed for quantitative gene expression analysis. It contains a proprietary DNA-binding dye that emits a fluorescent signal upon binding to double-stranded DNA, enabling the detection and quantification of target gene expression during the PCR reaction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using blue s green qpcr kit

1

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA for the RT-qPCR was prepared using a Quick RNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The RNA quality was analysed by running RNA-agarose gel electrophoresis. The cDNA was created using EpiScript Reverse Transcriptase (Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) with a 6 N random primer. The real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was carried out using Blue S-Green qPCR kit (Biozym, Germany) according to the supplier’s recommendations, using the ∆∆Ct comparative method. The primers used for this analysis are listed in Table 1. The ftsZ gene was used as endogenous calibrator for the experiment. The run was performed in a qTower system (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). Data were analysed using the qPCRsoft 3.4 software application (Analytik Jena).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overnight cultures grown in RPMI were diluted 1:100 to reach OD600 = 0.5. Samples were taken to represent the control before stress. Substances were added to the indicated concentrations and incubated for 15 min. After the incubation, the cultures were immediately put on ice to transfer to −80°C. RNA was isolated using RNAeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNase I treatment was done using RapidOut DNA removal kit followed by cDNA synthesis via SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase utilizing random hexamer primers and ofrA-specific primer with non-staphylococcal tag (Supplementary Table 2). Quantitative PCR was performed with Biozym Blue S’Green qPCR Kit and rho and rpoB as the internal controls (Sihto et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SAFB Knockdown and Mutant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SAFB triple knockdown was performed on Flp-In T-REx HEK293 cells as described above, and then FuGENE HD forward transfected with WT or truncation mutants as shown in Extended Data Fig. 7f while at the same time refreshing the medium 6 h following transfection of siRNAs. Transgenes were induced on day 1 of knockdown with 0.1 µg ml−1 DOX for 24 h. On day 2 of knockdown, total RNA extracts were prepared with the Zymo Quick-RNA Kit and first-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out with PrimerScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, no. RR036A). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the oligos listed in Supplementary Table 1 with the Blue S’Green qPCR Kit (Biozym, no. 331416).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating PSMC1 Knockdown Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate knockdown efficiency, RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 1 μg of RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA using the cDNA Synthesis Kit (Biozym). Real-time RT-PCR was performed using the Blue S’Green qPCR Kit (Biozym) with three specific primers for PSMC1 (PSMC1_F1 5′-AAGAAAAGCAAGAGGAGGAAAG-3′; PSMC1-R1 5′-CACAGATGTAGACACGATGG-3′; PSMC1_F2 5′-AGCAAACCAAACCTCAGCC-3′; PSMC1_R2 5′-TCCCCTAGAATCAAATCCATCC-3′; PSMC1_F3 5′-ACACTACGTCAGCATTCTTTC-3′; PSMC1_R3 5′-ATCCATCAGCACCCCTATC-3′). Expression of PSMC1 was normalized to the expression of HPRT, which served as housekeeping gene (hHPRT-fwd 5′-TGGACAGGACTGAACGTCTTG-3′; hHPRT-rev 5′-CCAGCAGGTCAGCAAAGAATTTA-3′). Results are shown as 2−ΔΔCt values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis of N. furzeri

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA isolation from N. furzeri embryos and tissues using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and quantitative Real Time RT-PCR analysis were performed as described (Zupkovitz et al., 2018b (link)). Total RNA was isolated from either snap-frozen whole embryos at different stages or brain, liver and muscle samples of adult fish following the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of isolated RNA was reverse transcribed with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad) and Real-time RT-PCRs were performed using the CFX384 Well qPCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) and Blue S’Green qPCR Kit (Biozym). TATA binding protein (tbp) housekeeping gene expression was used for normalization. All used primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 3. All expression raw values obtained from the Real-Time RT-PCR analysis (normalized to tbp) are listed in Supplementary Table 4. Real-time PCR experiments were initially analyzed with the CFX Maestro software. Graphical output and statistics were performed with Prism software (GraphPad). Statistical significances were calculated with one-way ANOVA implementing Tukey’s multiple comparisons. p-values were calculated employing Prism software and standard deviation (SD) is shown. p > 0.05; *: p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***: p ≤ 0.001; ****: p ≤ 0.0001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptomics Analysis of Yeast Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transcript level analysis, three clones per strain were cultivated in YPD medium (yeast extract 1%, peptone 2%, glucose 2%) in shake flasks overnight. Cells were washed and used to inoculate YNB medium (YNB without amino acids and ammonium sulfate 3.4 g L−1, ammonium sulfate 10 g L−1, potassium phosphate buffer 0.1 mol L−1 pH 6, biotin 0.4 mg L−1) with 2% glucose or xylose as carbon source. After 6 h of cultivation at 25 °C, cells were harvested and RNA was extracted according to the TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) protocol, followed by DNase treatment with the Ambion DNA-free kit (Invitrogen) and cDNA synthesis with oligo(dT)23 primers (NEB) and the Biozym cDNA synthesis kit. RNA integrity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Quantitative PCR was performed on a Rotor-Gene Q instrument (Qiagen) using the Blue S´Green qPCR kit (Biozym). Transcript levels were normalized to ACT1 expression and relative expression levels were calculated using the average expression of SOR1 in K. phaffii X-33 grown in YNB glucose as reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Real-Time qPCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For real‐time qPCR, total RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, #74106, Qiagen) and reverse transcribed (cDNA synthesis kit, #331470L, Biozym). Relative quantification of gene expression was performed by real‐time PCR on the CFX Connect Real‐Time System (Bio‐Rad) using SYBR green (Blue S'Green qPCR Kit, #331416XL, Biozym) normalized to β‐actin levels and unstimulated cells. Primer sequences are shown in Table S3 in supporting information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Homozygous Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative RT-PCR was performed on four biological with two technical replicates each, probing homozygous HWA and HNN versus control Hcwt. Poly(A+) RNA was prepared from 12 third-instar wandering larvae with the PolyATtract® System 1000 (Promega, Walldorf, Germany), followed by a DNase I (RNase free) digest (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from around 250 ng mRNA using the qScriber cDNA Synthesis Kit (HighQu, via Biozol, Eching, Germany). Real-time qPCR was performed as described before using the Blue S’Green qPCR Kit (Biozym, Scientific GmbH, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) on around 5 ng of cDNA and the MIC magnetic induction cycler (bms, via Biozym Scientific GmbH, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany), including target and no-template controls [40 (link)]. Internal reference genes were cyp33 and Tbp. Primer pair sequences are listed at the DRSC FlyPrimer bank [50 (link)]: cnc (PP60393), cyp33 (PP14577), ewg (PP35080), GstD1 (PP16044), mTFB2 (PP26980) and Tbp (PP1556). Respective oligonucleotides were obtained from Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland). The micPCR® software version 12.2 was used for relative quantification of the data, based on REST and taking target efficiency into account [51 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RT-PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For isolation of total RNA, samples were thawed and homogenized using a FastPrep 120 (Thermo Fisher Savant) and processed further using a Direct-zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research). Total RNA was quantified using a BioSpectrometer (Eppendorf), and 2 μg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription in a 20-μl reaction mixture with random hexameric primers following the instructions of the RevertAid H minus first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher). Reverse transcription reaction mixtures were diluted 12-fold with nuclease-free water, and 2 μl of the dilution was used as the input for a 10-μl SYBR-based qPCR (Blue S′Green qPCR kit; Biozym Scientific) on an AriaMx real-time PCR system (Agilent). Primers are listed in Table S1E. For each sample, technical duplicates for each target gene were measured. Raw threshold cycle (CT) data were exported to MS Excel and the Δ(CT) values from technical replicates (shake flasks and reaction replicates) were averaged before calculating the ΔΔ(CT) values according to the method in reference 76 (link), assuming an amplification efficiency of one. Actin (An15g00560) was used as the reference gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Gene Expression in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells and tissues using peqGOLD RNAPure™ (VWR International, 30-1010) and innuSOLV RNA Reagent (analytikjena, Jena, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A Precellys® 24 (Bertin, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) was used (6000 rpm, 30 s) to homogenize the adipose tissue samples. Reverse transcription was performed using a Proto-Script® First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (E6300L, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For qPCR analyses, gene-specific and intron-spanning primers were designed using Primer 3 software and were acquired from Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) unless otherwise noted (Table S1). A Biozym Blue S’Green qPCR Kit (331416XL, Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) and a Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression levels were quantified in duplicate and were calculated using internal amplification standards. 14-3-3 Protein zeta/delta (Ywhaz) was used as a reference gene for all samples for normalization.
Knockout of Smo was confirmed by assessment of Smo mRNA in liver tissue or hepatocytes. Only Hh-KO samples with Smo expression of less than 50% were included.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!