The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Agility mlc

Manufactured by Elekta
Sourced in United Kingdom, Sweden

The Agility MLC is a multileaf collimator (MLC) designed for radiotherapy treatment. It is a core component of Elekta's radiation therapy systems, responsible for precisely shaping and adjusting the radiation beam to match the contours of the target area. The Agility MLC features a high-performance, reliable design to support accurate and efficient radiotherapy delivery.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using agility mlc

1

Immobilization Techniques for Radiotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Our Radiation Therapy Department is equipped with one TomoTherapy™, Accuray Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and two Elekta Synergy™ treatment units with an Agility-MLC (Elekta) and one CT scanner—GE LightSpeed RT16.
Approximately 1 week prior to the treatment, all the patients underwent CT simulation using individualized fixation. The patients were immobilized in the supine position, laid in vacuum bags for body and extremity fixation, and used thermoplastic masks for head and neck fixation, as shown in Figure 1.
Following patient fixation, planning CT images were acquired using slice thicknesses of 5 mm. Patients taller than 115 cm were scanned twice. The first scan included the upper part of the body down to the knee joints, and the second scan included legs from the toes up to the upper third of the thigh. A fiducial marker was placed in the middle of the thigh to assist in determining the juncture between the two images.
Thirty-two patients (15%) of younger ages underwent both CT simulation and radiotherapy treatment under general anesthesia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Optimized CSABR Delivery Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CSABR plans were produced using the Pinnacle 9.10 TPS (Philips Medical Systems, Fitchburg, WI) using either volumetric modulated arc therapy (13 cases) or step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (2 cases). Treatments were delivered using either a Synergy linac with Beam Modulator MLC, or a Versa HD linac with Agility MLC (Elekta, Stockholm. Sweden). Normal tissue constraints were selected in accordance with AAPM TG101 guidelines.22 (link) No dose painting techniques were used for CSABR planning. The clinical dosimetrists added structures for plan optimization as needed, typically including concentric shells around the PTV. Six plans did not incorporate a maximum target dose objective, allowing for increased target dose heterogeneity to improve proximal normal tissue sparing.23 (link) The remaining 9 plans incorporated varying maximum target dose objectives with mean (range) values of 114% (100%-133%) of the prescription dose.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Elekta Synergy Linac HLF Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, the Elekta Synergy linac with an Agility MLC (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) was used to obtain an HLF. The linac control system, Integrity R 4.0 (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), writes the leaf position, jaw position, gantry angle, and monitor unit to the HLF every 40 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Personalized Radiotherapy Planning for Glioma Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A standard plan and a DP plan were developed for each patient in RayStation. To overcome the absence of computed tomography (CT) data in the public dataset, water-equivalent density overrides were assigned to the brain (1.04 g/cm3) and the skull (1.61 g/cm3). Both plans were created as volumetric modulated arc therapy with two 6 MV full arcs from an Elekta Versa HD with Agility MLC (5 mm leaf size). For the standard plan, an isodose of 60 Gy delivered in 30 daily fractions was assigned to the PTV. Dose constraints to OARs were set according to EORTC guidelines.31 ,32 (link) For the DP plan the inverse dose prescription map previously imported into RayStation was assigned to a mock treatment plan. DP plans were generated using an approach previously described by Arnesen et al.35 The optimization was performed in dose summation mode, where the mock plan containing the inverse DP prescription was assigned as a pretreated plan. As optimization targets minimum dose of 76.8 Gy to GTV, minimum dose of 61.2 Gy to CTV, minimum dose of 60.6 Gy to PTV, and maximum dose of 77.5 Gy to PTV were used to allow the optimizer to create the prescribed DP dose distribution within the PTV for the actual plan (Supplementary Fig. S1). Fractionation and dose constraints to OARs were set as per the standard plans.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fiducial Imaging for Lung and Liver Tumor Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 52 patients were imaged with both FI and IECT. Treatment localizations were lung (39 patients, 12 in the upper lobe, 11 in the medial lobe, and 16 in the lower lobe) and liver (13 patients). All the patients were scanned and treated with their arms around the head, lying over a foam cradle and with a body mask performing abdominal compression.
Due to difficulties to locate tumors during daily treatment verification with CBCT, two to three 8‐shaped platinum pushable coils (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) were placed to liver patients inside or close to the tumor as fiducial markers. The markers were then used as tracking target in FI.
Treatments were planned with a Pinnacle 16.0 (Philips) treatment planning system (TPS). 3D conformal radiotherapy technique (3DCRT) was used for lung tumors except for the cases requiring a VMAT technique. This last technique was employed on all of the liver tumors. The Planning Target Volume encloses the ITV with a 5 mm margin. An Elekta (Elekta, Crawley, UK) C‐arm linac with an Agility MLC was used for treatment delivery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

IMRT Planning for Elekta Synergy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For generating IMRT plans for the patients, ELECTA TPS of Elekta Monaco 5.1, which relies on the XVMC algorithm, was used for dose calculation. All IMRT plans were generated in a 6 MV Elekta Synergy LINAC, equipped with an Agility MLC. IMRT planning was performed with six fields using MLC delivery method in dynamic mode. The initial gantry angles of these six fields were chosen as 260°, 230°, 170°, 140°, 110°, and 70°. Collimator or table angle was not used for any of these fields [Figure 2].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

VMAT Treatment Planning Using Monte Carlo

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VMAT plans were generated using a 6 MV photon beam, with the clinical Monaco Version 5.11.01 TPS (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and the Agility MLC. For all patients included in this study a VMAT plan using two coplanar arcs was calculated using a Monte Carlo algorithm, with a calculation grid size of (0.3 cm)3 and a statistical uncertainty during dose prediction of 1%. These plans were delivered clinically.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Measurements of a 6 MV FFF Photon Field

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Elekta VersaHD (Elekta AB, Sweden) linear accelerator equipped with the Agility MLC was used in this study. The in-air measurements were performed in a water phantom (MP3, PTW, Freiburg, Germany) using a stereotactic field diode (SFD; IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) for a 6 MV 1 × 1 cm2 photon field in flattening filter-free (FFF) mode at a source-to-detector distance of 100 cm. The measured data were obtained in the form of a 2D array in which each value corresponded to an in-air measurement in a certain position of the SFD, repeated 3 times and averaged. The 2D array dimensions were −11.4 mm to +11.4 mm in steps of 1.9 mm that provided 169 measurement points. The scheme of the SFD positions during the measurements is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Scheme of the SFD positions. Squares – positions of the SFD silicon chips during MC simulations. Circles – approximate positions of the center of the SFD detector during the measurements. All positions are placed equidistantly beginning from the center of the a 1 × 1 cm2 field.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Elekta Linacs MLC Protocol Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different institutions with Elekta linacs (two VersaHD and one Synergy) equipped with the Agility MLC (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and the RayStation TPS (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden) participated in this study, using the 6 MV flattened beam. The Agility MLC uses a flat slightly non-target pointing surface [14] (link), [15] (link). The tilted leaf side is cut by the rounding of the leaf tip, reducing the maximum extension of the tongue-and-groove into the open region with a progressive increase of tongue-and-groove shadowing as far as 20 mm from the leaf tip end [7] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Linear Accelerator Performance Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements were performed on a VersaHD linear accelerator (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) equipped with an Agility MLC (5 mm leaf width). Also available was the MV imaging acquisition software iViewGT™ (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) with an amorphous silicon EPID (PerkinElmer XRD 1642 AP) which is situated at 160 cm distance from the linac target. The EPID panel has a detection area of 41 × 41 cm2 (1024 × 1024 pixels). Treatment plans with all available energies (6 MV, 10 MV, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF) were generated with Pinnacle V9.10 (Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!