The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using ethanol solution

1

Spectrophotometric SPF Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sun protection factor (SPF) was measured following Kaur and Saraf [37 (link)] methodology. The extract aliquots (20 µL) were homogeneously blended with 40% (v/v) ethanol solution (1980 µL) (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and scanned between 290 and 320 nm. According to the Mansur et al. [38 ] procedure, the SPF values were determined using the following equation: SPF=CF x290320EE λ× I λ × Abs λ.
where SPF corresponds to the spectrophotometric sun protection factor, CF represents a necessary correction factor (10), EE(λ) indicates the erythemal effect of the radiation with wavelength λ, I(λ) represents the solar intensity of the spectrum and Abs (λ) displays the spectrophotometric absorbance values at wavelength λ. The normalized product of EE(λ) and I(λ) utilized in the calculation of SPF was previously considered by Sayre et al. [39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plants were fixed in glutaraldehyde solution (EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) 2.5% in phosphate buffer (PB 0.1 M [pH 7.4]) for 1h at RT and postfixed in a fresh mixture of osmium tetroxide 1% (EMS) with 1.5% of potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PB buffer for 1 h at RT. The samples were then washed twice in distilled water and dehydrated in ethanol solution (Sigma) at graded concentrations (30%—40 min; 50%—40 min; 70%—40 min; 100%—2 × 1 h). This was followed by infiltration in Spurr resin (EMS) at graded concentrations (Spurr 33% in ethanol—4 h; Spurr 66% in ethanol—4 h; Spurr 100%—2 × 8 h) and finally polymerized for 48 h at 60°C in an oven. For the multiple mutant, ultrathin sections of 50 nm thick were cut transversally at 2 mm above the root tip, using a Leica Ultracut (Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH, Vienna, Austria), picked up on a copper slot grid 2 × 1 mm (EMS) coated with a polystyrene film (Sigma). Micrographs and panoramic were taken with a transmission electron microscope FEI CM100 (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV with a TVIPS TemCamF416 digital camera (TVIPS GmbH, Gauting, Germany) using the software EM-MENU 4.0 (TVIPS GmbH). Panoramic were aligned with the software IMOD (Kremer et al., 1996 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrastructural Analysis of Arabidopsis Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were fixed in glutaraldehyde solution (EMS, Hatfield, PA) 2.5% in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 1 hr at room temperature. Then, they were post-fixed in osmium tetroxide 1% (EMS) with 1.5% of potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in phosphate buffer for 1 hr at room temperature. Following that, the plants were rinsed twice in distilled water and dehydrated in ethanol solution (Sigma) at gradient concentrations (30% 40 min; 50% 40 min; 70% 40 min); two times (100% 1 hr). This was followed by infiltration in Spurr resin (EMS) at gradient concentrations (Spurr 33% in ethanol, 4 hr); Spurr 66% in ethanol, 4 hr; Spurr two times (100% 8 hr) and finally polymerized for 48 hr at 60°C in an oven. Ultrathin sections 50-nm-thick were cut transversally at 2 mm ±0.2 mm from the root tip, on a Leica Ultracut (Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH, Vienna, Austria) and two consecutive sections were picked up on a nickel slot grid 2 × 1 mm (EMS) coated with a polystyrene film (Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microstructural Analysis of Gdf5 Knockout Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P12 control and Gdf5 KO tibias were dissected, fixated overnight in 4% PFA in PBS, and dehydrated to 100% ethanol (dehydration sequence: 25%, 50%, 70%, and twice in 100% for 1 h each). According to ref. 97 (link), samples were soaked in 2% iodine in 100% ethanol solution (Sigma) for 48 h at 4 °C. Tissue was washed in 100% ethanol twice for 30 minutes each prior to scanning. Samples were then mounted in 100% ethanol and scanned by MicroXCT-400 (Xradia) at 30 kV and 4.5 W with the Macro-70 lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

2,6-DCBQ Biochemical Assays Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2,6-DCBQ (CH3(CH2)3COCH(CH3)2, CAS: 13019-20-0, purity ≥ 98%) was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific Co., Ltd. (Waltham, MA, USA). Ethanol solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was used to make 10 g L−1 stock solution and frozen at −80 °C before use. Different concentrations of test solutions were prepared by dissolving 2,6-DCBQ stock solution into 0.9% saline solution. The reagent kits used in biochemical, and assays were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Research Institute (Nanjing, China). The primers, reagents and kits for gene expression measurement were purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and TaKaRa Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Functionalization of Gold Nanoparticles with Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AuNPs were purchased from Nanotech Company (6th October City, Egypt) and scanned by transmission electron microscope. AuNPs functionalized with mercaptoundecanoic acid (AuNPs-MUA) by adding 30 mL of the prepared AuNPs to 45 µL of 1 mMmercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) in ethanol solution (Sigma Aldrich, Germany). The solution was mixed and left overnight at 4°C. The concentration was determined the next day by UV/vis spectrophotometry using Beer’s law.26 (link)
The 3rd fraction of polyclonal antibodies was conjugated with nanogold particles (AuNPs-MUA). Two mg of anti-Toxoplasma pAb was added to 5 mL of AuNPs-MUA (2 nM; pH = 7.4). To obtain more robust AuNPs-pAb conjugates, the covalent linkage between pAb and AuNPs-MUA was done through the use of N-hydroxy succinimide/1-Ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide (NHS/EDC) cross-linkers (NHS: Fluka, Germany). Five mL of a mixture of 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 7), 1.2 mM NHS, and 2.8 mM EDC was added to 5 mL of AuNPs-pAb conjugates. The mixture was mixed and left to incubate overnight at 4°C.27 (link),28 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Optimizing CGA Supplementation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In cultured groups (experimental 2), CGA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) powder was dissolved in ethanol solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and directly (after ltering) added into the culture medium (Nguyen, Wittayarat et al. 2018 (link)). The best dose of CGA was chosen pending our different evaluations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis and Electrochemical Analysis of DF-CMK-3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthesis of DF-CMK-3: diclofenac sodium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and distilled water (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used during synthesis.
Electrochemical measurements: Appropriate volumes of 1 M CH3COONH4 and 1 M HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used to obtain 1 M buffer solution (CH3COONH4, CH3COOH, and NH4Cl) with a pH of 5.6. The standard solutions of Fe3+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Sb3+, Pb2+, NO2, NO3, Cl, and Triton X-100 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used to study the selectivity of the proposed procedure, and 96% ethanol solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to prepare 10 and 1 mM roxarsone (ROX, AK Scientific, Union City, CA, USA). The ROX solution with a concentration of 0.01 mM was prepared daily in 0.1 M PBS buffer with a pH of 7.2. The wastewater samples were obtained from the Municipal Water Supply & Waste Water Treatment Company Ltd. (Lublin, Poland), while river water samples were collected from the Vistula River (Sandomierz, Poland). The ROX spiked samples were filtered (0.22 µm Millipore filter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Electrochemical Determination of Roxarsone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultrapurified water (>18 MW cm, Milli-Q system, Millipore, UK) was used to prepare the solutions. To prepare 10 and 1 mM solutions of roxarsone (AK Scientific, Union City, CA, USA), 96% ethanol solution (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), Triton X-100 and cetyltrimethylamonnium bromide (CTAB) were obtained from Merck. An acetate buffer solution (NaAc–HAc) made with CH3COONa and CH3COOH (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) of pH 5.6 was used for analysis of ROX. For interference studies, standard solutions of Fe3+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Sb3+, Cu2+, NO2, NO3, Cl and PO43− (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used. River water samples from the Bystrzyca River (Lublin, Poland) were spiked with appropriate concentrations of ROX and filtered using a 0.22 µm Millipore filter.
An µAutolab analyzer with GPES 4.9 and FRA 4.9 software (Eco Chemie, Utrecht, Netherlands) was applied to perform the electrochemical experiments. The CTAB-modified GCE (diameter of 1 mm), Ag/AgCl (3M KCl) and Pt wire were used as the working, reference and auxiliary electrodes, respectively. The electrode surface cleaning was performed using silicon carbide paper (SiC-paper, #2000, Buehler, Skovlunde, Denmark), alumina particle suspension (0.3 µm), a Buehler polishing pad and an ultrasonic bath (InterSonic, model IS-2, Olsztyn, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessing Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in six-well plates (1.0 × 102 cells/well) and cultured in M10 medium for 15 days. For migration and invasion assays 5 × 104 cells/chamber suspended in MEM were added to the upper compartments of the Transwells with 8 μm pores (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). M10 was added to the wells for chemotactic attraction, followed by incubation of the plates for 12 h for migration and 36 h for invasion assay. Cell invasion was assessed by their ability to transpose both a Matrigel® coat (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and barrier (Corning Incorporated, USA). Colonies, migrating and invading cells were fixed with 70% ethanol solution (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), stained with 0.5% crystal violet (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) in 10% ethanol solution and counted. For anchorage independent growth assay, 2.5 × 102 cells were suspended in 500 μL of M10 medium with 0.6% agarose and seeded in 24-well plates coated with the 1% agarose, and covered with M10 medium. After 30 days 50 μL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, 5mg/mL) was added for staining and counting of colonies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!