The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sound attenuating chamber

Manufactured by Med Associates
Sourced in United States, Sao Tome and Principe

Sound-attenuating chambers are enclosed spaces designed to reduce the level of ambient noise and sound. These chambers provide a controlled acoustic environment suitable for various applications, such as sound measurement, audio testing, and noise-sensitive experiments.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

52 protocols using sound attenuating chamber

1

Operant Conditioning Chamber Experiment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental sessions were conducted in operant chambers (MED Associates, St. Albans, VT) housed inside sound-attenuating chambers (MED Associates). Each chamber contained one retractable and one non-retractable lever. A stimulus light was positioned above each lever, and each chamber was equipped with a house light. Fans mounted to the sound attenuating chambers provided ventilation, and infusion pumps (Med Associates) were located outside the chamber. All responses were recorded by MED-PC software (Med-Associates) on a computer in the experimental room.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Operant Conditioning in Plexiglas Chambers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Training chambers were Plexiglas boxes (32 cm length x25 cm width x30 cm height) encased in sound-attenuating chambers (Med Associates, ST Albans, VT). 10 % liquid sucrose was delivered through a recessed port in the center of one wall. Port entries and exits were monitored through an infrared beam. Two lights (28v, 100 mA) located on either side of the port served as the 20 s continuous light cue. A house light (28v, 100 mA) at the top of the wall opposite the port provided constant illumination in context B. Auditory cues were delivered via a “tweeter” speaker (ENV-224BM) located at the top of the same wall as the port. A grid floor delivered footshocks via a constant current aversive stimulator (ENV-414S). A side-view video camera located on the door of the sound-attenuating cubicle recorded behavior for offline video analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fear Conditioning and Extinction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fear conditioning trials were carried out in conditioning chambers placed in sound attenuating chambers (Med Associates, St Albans, VT) and freezing during each trial was monitored continuously using a video tracking and analysis system (Freezeframe, Actimetrix Software, Wilmette, IL). On day one animals were given a 3 min training trial consisting of 2 min of pre-exposure followed by a 2 s 0.6 mA continuous foot shock and 58 s of post-shock exposure. On subsequent days animals were reintroduced to the conditioning chamber in the absence of shock for 10 min. Percent of time spent freezing during the first 2 min of these trails was used to monitor extinction of the freezing response.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fentanyl Self-Administration in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rats were trained in Med Associates operant boxes housed in individual sound-attenuating chambers (Med Associates, St Albans, VT, USA). operant boxes were fitted with 2 levers (active and inactive), a stimulus light located directly above the active lever, speaker, and house light. All boxes were controlled by Med-PC IV software (Med Associates, St Albans, VT, USA). Rats were first trained in 2 hr sessions on a fixed-ratio 1 (FR-1) schedule. Active lever presses resulted in a 0.5μg infusion of fentanyl delivered in 50μl of sterile saline over 3.6s. Each infusion was paired with stimulus light (white light) and tone (78 dB, 2900 Hz) and was followed by a 20-sec time out signaled by termination of the house light. Rats were trained for a minimum of 6 sessions and to a criterion of > 25 infusion for 3 consecutive sessions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Operant Conditioning for Sustained Attention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sixteen operant chambers, located inside sound-attenuating chambers (Med Associates, Inc., Fairfax, VT), were used to train animals in a signal detection task tapping sustained attention. A pellet dispenser (45 mg), located between two retractable levers, and three panel lights were located on the front wall of the operant chambers. Only the panel light located above the pellet dispenser was used in the present experiment. A house light was located at the top of the rear wall of the operant chamber. The house light, used for shaping, and central panel light, used for signal presentation during the original acquisition of signal detection and retest assessments, were incandescent (22 lux). PC and Med-PC for Windows software (V 4.1.3; Med Associates, Inc., Fairfax, VT) controlled signal presentation, lever operation, reinforcement delivery, and data collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Operant Conditioning in HIV-1 Tg Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HIV-1 Tg and control animals were trained and assessed in a signal detection operant task using 22 operant boxes located inside sound-attenuating chambers (Med Associates, Inc., Fairfax, VT). The front wall of the operant chambers included a 45 mg pellet dispenser, two retractable levers, and three panel lights (22 lx). The rear wall of the operant chambers had a house light (5.5 lx). A PC and Med-PC for Windows software (V 4.1.3; Med Associates Inc., Fairfax, VT) controlled the presentation of signals, lever operation, reinforcement delivery, and data collection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Operant Conditioning and Neurotransmitter Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental sessions were conducted in operant conditioning chambers for rats (MED Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA) housed inside sound-attenuating chambers (MED Associates). Each operant conditioning chamber contained two retractable levers, with a stimulus light above each lever, and a house light. One lever was designated as the active lever and the other lever was designated as inactive. The side of the operant conditioning chamber associated with the active lever was counterbalanced across subjects. Fans provided ventilation for each chamber and speakers provided white noise. Infusion pumps (Med Associates) were located outside the chamber. Experimental events were arranged and recorded by MED-PC software (Med-Associates).
A Thermo Scientific CoulArray Multi-Channel ECD Array system (model 5600A; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze neurotransmitter concentrations. The array detector contained 16 coulometric electrochemical cells that provided quantitation of multiple neurotransmitters and metabolites simultaneously. An Agilent 1100 HPLC System (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and an Applied Biosystems API 4000 Triple Quadrupole liquid chromatography mass spectrometer (LC-MS) with Turbo Ion Spray source (Foster City, CA, USA) were used for quantitation of GLU.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Murine Locomotor Activity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Horizontal locomotor activity was assessed in plexiglass and metal test boxes housed in sound-attenuating chambers (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT) and located in a procedure room separate from the housing room. Figure 1 shows that each box had two adjacent compartments (16.8 × 12.7 cm2 floor area × 12.7 cm high) separated by a wall. One compartment had black walls with a bar floor, and mice were always placed in this compartment to start each session. The other compartment had white walls with a wire-mesh floor. Additionally, each compartment had a clear plexiglass lid fitted with a house light as well as six photobeams arranged at 3-cm intervals across the long wall and 1 cm above the floor. Photobeams were monitored by a microprocessor operating Med Associates software. The wall separating the two compartments contained a central door (5 cm wide × 6 cm high). For most experiments, the lower 1-inch (2.54 cm) portion of the door was obstructed by a stainless-steel wire-mesh barrier that had to be surmounted for mice to cross back and forth between the two compartments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Contextual Fear Conditioning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fear conditioning occurred in conditioning chambers (exterior dimensions: 31.8 cm L × 25.4 cm W × 26.7 cm H) housed within sound-attenuating chambers (Med Associates). The operant chambers were fixed with a grid floor set to deliver a 1 sec, 0.75 mA scrambled shock and a house light that illuminated to signal the start of the session. Before and after each round of behavior, the grid floors and chamber walls were cleaned with 95% ethanol. Animals were loaded into chambers in red light conditions to maintain the dark circadian cycle. For Experiments 2 and 3, the walls of the chamber were also fitted with horizontal black and white stripes to provide additional visual cues.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Open Field Locomotor Assay in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the testing day, 8 week old mice were transported to the testing room between the hours of 0900 and 1100 and were habituated for two hours. Locomotor activity was assayed using infrared activity monitors (Accuscan, Columbus, OH) surrounding an open field of 8×8×11 inches. Distance traveled was monitored for a period of two hours. Two acrylic boxes fit inside a single Accuscan monitor, enabling us to test two animals simultaneously. Whether another animal is present in the second box affects locomotor behavior in this assay (D.J.S and A.S.P., personal observations). We found that testing two animals from different home cages in a single Accuscan monitor both reduced variability and allowed high-throughput rates. Activity monitors were themselves housed inside sound-attenuating chambers (Med-Associates) equipped with lights and fans, both of which were turned on during the testing session. Acrylic boxes were rinsed with hot water and dried and then wiped down with a solution of 2.5% glacial acetic acid between testing sessions (Speca et al. 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!