The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Astrios eq cell sorter

Manufactured by Beckman Coulter
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Astrios EQ cell sorter is a high-performance flow cytometry instrument designed for cell sorting applications. It provides accurate and reliable cell separation capabilities for a variety of research and clinical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using astrios eq cell sorter

1

FACS Analysis of GFP-Liposome Conjugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FACS was conducted to evaluate conjugations of GFP to liposomes. The Astrios EQ Cell sorter (Beckman Coulter-Life Sciences, Wycombe, UK) was used, and all outputs were analysed using Kaluza Analysis 2.1 software (Beckman Coulter-Life Sciences, Wycombe, UK). Liposomes and GFP were individually gated by their forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) using a 488 nm laser. For liposomes, both Lipo and MalLipo suspensions were used for positive gating and for establishing GFP negative fluorescence. The median florescence (MFI) was used to determine the relative median fluorescence (rMFI) by the equation: rMFI=MFI of liposomes in gated populationMFI of liposomes in negative control
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Rhodamine-labeled DNA Transfection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at 4 × 104 cells/well in 24 well plates and incubated overnight in 500 μL of GM. For each well of cells to be treated, 1 μg rhodamine-labelled DNA was diluted in 25 μL Opti-MEM and mixed. Peptide in 25 μL Opti-MEM was added to the diluted DNA at CR3. The solution was mixed and incubated for 20 min at RT to allow complexation of the peptide to the DNA. The cells were aspirated, washed with PBS and replaced with 200 μL GM. Each well of cells was treated with 50 μL of peptide/DNA complex solution and incubated. Following a 4 h treatment, cells were treated with 25% (w/v) trypsin/2 mM EDTA and fixed in 3.7% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in preparation for flow cytometry. Rhodamine-labelled cells were analysed on a Beckman Coulter Astrios EQ Cell Sorter using a green 561 nm laser (40,000 cells; gated on untreated cells by forward/side scatter). Data was analysed on flow cytometry analysis software (WEASEL) and mean fluorescence intensity was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-cell Sorting Using Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometer cell sorting was performed at the Microbial Single Cell Genomics Facility (SiCell), SciLifeLab. Prior to cell sorting, calibration was performed using 10 μm fluorescent beads. The harvested cell suspensions were filtered through BD Falcon Cell-Strainer Caps (# 352235). Samples were sorted at either room temperature or 5 °C on a Beckman Coulter AstriosEQ cell sorter using a 488 nm laser for excitation, 100 μm nozzle, sheath pressure of 60 psi (normal) or 25 psi (low), and PBS solution as sheath fluid (0.2 μm filtered before use). Sorting of cell subpopulations of different sizes was based on a gating strategy relying on forward scatter (FSC) versus side scatter (SSC) parameters. Cell fractions were sorted into 0.5 ml Eppendorf tubes containing 20 μl of WCL culture medium using the single cell sorting mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Sorting of Macrophage Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macrophages were flow-sorted from age and sex-matched Cx3cr1GFP/+ reporter mice. The gating strategy, as illustrated in the figures, guided the precise selection of IMs and AMs. Each experimental time point involved the use of a pair of age and sex-matched mice, ensuring a balanced representation with one male and one female mouse. The flow sorting procedure was conducted employing an Astrios EQ cell sorter (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences) at the CUAMC Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Shared Resource. Following the flow sorting, the isolated cells were collected in a specialized medium (HBSS-Gibco with 2.5% FBS), subjected to centrifugation, accurately counted, and prepared for subsequent sequencing analysis. This systematic approach ensured the acquisition of high-quality data from the sorted IMs and AMs, contributing to the comprehensive understanding of their transcriptional profiles across different conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rhodamine-labeled DNA Transfection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at 4 × 104 cells/well in 24 well plates and incubated overnight in 500 μL of GM. For each well of cells to be treated, 1 μg rhodamine-labelled DNA was diluted in 25 μL Opti-MEM and mixed. Peptide in 25 μL Opti-MEM was added to the diluted DNA at CR3. The solution was mixed and incubated for 20 min at RT to allow complexation of the peptide to the DNA. The cells were aspirated, washed with PBS and replaced with 200 μL GM. Each well of cells was treated with 50 μL of peptide/DNA complex solution and incubated. Following a 4 h treatment, cells were treated with 25% (w/v) trypsin/2 mM EDTA and fixed in 3.7% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) in preparation for flow cytometry. Rhodamine-labelled cells were analysed on a Beckman Coulter Astrios EQ Cell Sorter using a green 561 nm laser (40,000 cells; gated on untreated cells by forward/side scatter). Data was analysed on flow cytometry analysis software (WEASEL) and mean fluorescence intensity was used for statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tracking Epigenomic Changes in HER2-Negative Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transfected HCT116 cells were assayed by flow cytometry after 72-h puromycin selection (96 h after transfection). For flow cytometry collection of the HER2-negative cell population, cells were harvested from two independent biological replicates, washed once in PBS, and resuspended in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS. After adding 3 µl APC-conjugated antihuman CD340 (erbB2/HER-2) antibody (Biolegend #324408), cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. Labeled cells were washed once and resuspended in 1% BSA in PBS. Cell sorting was performed using an Astrios EQ cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) at the UC Davis Flow Cytometry Shared Resource Core. Untreated HCT116 control cells were used to determine the APC signal for HER2-expressing cells, while unlabeled cells were used to determine the sorting gate for HER2-negative cells. Four days after combinatorial epi-dCas9 transfections, HER2-negative cells were collected and replated using standard media. Cells were harvested at indicated time points, dependent on cells reaching ~ 80% confluency. Cells were expanded in 24-well dishes for RNA isolation (5 days, 14 days, 23 days, 39 days, 44 days and 50 days) and in 6-well dishes for DNA methylation analysis (10 days, 17 days and 24 days) and Western blot analysis (40 days). For ChIP assays (24 days), cells were plated in 10-cm dishes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Shared BCR Clones Between Donors and Recipients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Memory B cells (CD19+ CD27+) were sorted from cryopreserved donor B-cell products and PBs (CD19+ CD27hi CD38hi) from 4 recipients 7 days after experimental vaccinations on an Astrios EQ cell sorter (Beckman Coulter). RNA was purified using the RNeasy plus micro kit (Qiagen). The human B-cell receptor (BCR) Heavy Chain V-C gene kit (iRepertoire Inc) was used to perform multiplex PCR to generate full-length VH libraries for sequencing following the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed using Illumina MiSeq (Next generation sequencing (NGS) Core Facility of FAU). From the raw sequencing data, we used the CDR3 algebra tool in the iRweb tools (iRepertoire Inc) to find shared CDR3 clones between matching and nonmatching donor recipient pairs. CDR3 sequences were normalized to 10 million reads for each sample and exported. The top 100 clones for the PB repertoire were analyzed using Microsoft Excel for shared identical CDR3 clones in the matching and nonmatching memory BCR libraries.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ADAR3 Mutant Library Screening in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ADAR3 mutant library covering the top 11 mutations was transformed to S. cerevisiae INVSc1 strain already harboring the yeGFP reporter using a high efficiency lithium protocol (28 (link)). A small fraction of transformation mixture was plated on dropout plate to calculate transformation efficiency. The transformation was estimated to cover at least 50-fold of the theoretical diversity of the library. The remaining transformation mixture was used to inoculate 10 ml CM – ura – trp + 2% glucose media and grew until OD600 reaches to 7–8. The glucose culture was then used to inoculate CM – ura – trp + 3% glycerol + 2% lactate media (0.25 ml to 25 ml) and after an additional 36 h of growth (OD600 = 1–2), galactose was added to a final concentration of 3% for induction. Cells collected after 24 h induction were washed twice and resuspended with PBS to 20 000 cells/μl. Cells were sorted using Beckman Coulter Astrios EQ cell sorter at UC Davis flow cytometry shared resource laboratory. GFP excitation was at 488 nm and emission at 529/28 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Screening hADAR2-D mutant library

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells expressing hADAR2-D E396A or the hADAR2-D loop library were diluted in PBS to 20 000 cells/μl. Cells were sorted using Beckman Coulter Astrios EQ cell sorter at UC Davis flow cytometry shared resource laboratory. GFP excitation was at 488 nm and emission at 529/28 nm. Cells expressing hADAR2-D mutants were collected in eppendorf tubes corresponding to each gate (R1–R5). More than 150 000 cells were collected for each gate. Collected cell samples were each used to inoculate 2 ml CM – ura – trp + 2% glucose media in a BD falcon polypropylene round-bottom tube and cultured for approximately 24 h, after which the 2 ml cultures were used to inoculate 11 ml fresh CM – ura – trp + 2% glucose media for another 24 h growth. Cells were then pelleted and plasmids were isolated from each cell pellet. Contour plots creation and data analysis were performed using FlowJo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Labeling Cortical Neuronal Progenitors with CFSE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Labeling of cortical neuronal progenitors with CFSEs was achieved as described elsewhere (Govindan et al., 2018 (link)). Briefly, 1 µl of a 5 mM solution of CellTrace CFSE (from the CellTrace CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit, Invitrogen, C34554) and 0.01% Fast Green in DMSO was injected into the third ventricle of E13.5 control and Emx1-NICD embryos. Dams were allowed to recover and injected embryos were collected 1 h post-injection. Embryonic cortices were dissected individually and dissociated into single cells using Papain Dissociation System (Worthington Biochemical, LK003150) following the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were resuspended in FACS media (DMEM/F12 without phenol red supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and B-27) and sorted using a Beckman Coulter Astrios EQ Cell Sorter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!