The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using alamut batch

1

Robust DNA Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was isolated following the manufacturers’ instructions (QIAGEN, Dneasy blood & tissue kit). DNA library preparation was performed with the Kapa HyperPrep kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), followed by exome target capturing with the SeqCap EZ exome probes V3 kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Cluster generation was carried out on a cBOT system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and samples were subsequently sequenced (paired end, 2 × 250 bp) on a HiSeq1500 machine (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Bio-informatic analysis of the data was done with an in-house developed pipeline based on Picard Tools (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA), the BWA aligner56 , GATK (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA) and Alamut Batch (Interactive BioSoftware, Rouen, France). For the variant filtering, we used the software package Highlander (https://sites.uclouvain.be/highlander/) and used the BAM files as input.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ABCA4 Variant Identification in Rare Diseases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples underwent targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) (MiSeq, Illumina, CA, USA). Read mapping, single-nucleotide variant, structural variant, and indel calling and subsequent variant identification and annotation were performed using CLC Bio Software (CLC Bio Genomics Workbench; QIAGEN, Germany).  Annotations included frequencies from a subset of the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BioResource Rare Diseases Whole Genome Sequencing data set containing 7322 individuals without a known IRD, the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and GoNL databases, presence within published minor exons of ABCA4 or 200 bp of neighbouring sequence (Table S2), overlap with long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) (Table S2) and published noncoding ABCA4 variants (Table S3), and presence in candidate regulatory regions, as determined by ATAC-seq, RNA-seq, H3K27Ac, and H3K4me2 ChIP-seq data generated on adult human retina (Table S4; unpublished data: Cherry et al.,doi.org/10.1101/412361).19 (link)–22 (link),29 (link) Further annotation was performed via Alamut Batch (Interactive Biosoftware, France). A custom Lua script was used for additional data processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotype Calling and Annotation Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biobank samples are genotyped using 3 versions of the Multi-Ethnic Global BeadChip SNP array offered by Illumina that is designed to capture the diversity of genetic backgrounds across the globe.17 These arrays cover over 1.7 million unphased variants which are annotated for dbSNP rs identifier, gene location, and protein and variant effect using Alamut-Batch (Interactive Biosoftware, France, Alamut-Batch/">https://www.interactive-biosoftware.com/Alamut-Batch/). Genotype calls and annotations are made available to investigators as VCF and PED file formats. Imputed genotypes are also available. To support querying by patient-level variant and zygosity, we extended the i2b2 web client to enable genomic queries by rsid and gene and allow constraints by variant effect (for gene queries) and zygosity (see Supplementary Figure S1). The VCF files are indexed using an optimized binary index and exposed as a REST API web service and integrated into the i2b2 application. Additional details and code for extending i2b2 for genomic queries is available at (https://community.i2b2.org/wiki/display/IGD)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA-Seq Data Analysis Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Illumina adaptors were trimmed using Flexbar (Dodt et al. 2012) with the following settings: minimum 6 bp overlap between adapter and read sequence allowing 2 bp mismatches, trimming of 3′end until base quality of Phred‐score 25, and a minimum read length of 30. Trimmed fastq‐files were aligned to the human reference sequence assembly Feb.2009 GRCh37/hg19 (UCSC Genome Browser) with the Burrows‐Wheeler Aligner (BWA)‐MEM algorithm (Li and Durbin 2009) to generate BAM‐files. The following settings were used with the BWA‐MEM algorithm: Mismatch penalty of 20 and gap penalty of 4. Variant Caller Files (VCFs) were generated using HaplotypeCaller of GATK ver. 2.6.5 (McKenna et al. 2010) with a minimum emission confidence threshold of Phred‐score 10 and a calling confidence threshold of Phred‐score 30. Postvariant analysis on VCFs was carried out in the statistical software R (R core team, version 3.1.1, URL http://www.R-project.org). Variants were accepted if they had a minimum coverage of 25 and heterozygote variants calls were accepted if the read frequency of the minor variant was >0.15. Accepted variants were analyzed using Alamut Batch (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Variant Calling Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variants were called using LoFreq (version 2.1.1), FreeBayes (version 0.9.9) and proprietary methods. VariantPlex pipeline parameters were adjusted to accommodate the large footprint of SNiPDx and minimize background noise within variant calls. Variant calls <300 base pairs from the nearest gene-specific primers within regions of interest in reads with a minimum base quality of 22, and with a minimum allele fraction of 0.02, were reported. Genes, transcripts and consequences of variants were accessed through Alamut Batch (Interactive BioSoftware) using database version 1.5-2020.11.25. A variant call format file for each sample was generated using VCFtools version 0.1.11.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Exome Sequencing for Epileptic Encephalopathy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Library preparation and capture for exome sequencing was performed at the Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research using Agilent SureSelect Clinical Research Exome v2 (Agilent). Sequencing was performed on a HiSeqX (Illumina) to an average depth of coverage of 100× across captured regions. Alignments and variant calls were generated using SoftGenetics NextGene (version 2.4.1, SoftGenetics) to the February 2009 human genome assembly (GRCh37/hg19), and variant calls were restricted to coding regions and the canonical splice sites of an epileptic encephalopathy gene panel. Variants identified were then annotated using Alamut Batch (version 1.9, Interactive Biosoftware) and classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria (Richards et al. 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Variant Annotation and Filtering Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Annotation and ranking of SNVs/indels and structural variations were performed, respectively, by VaRank (Geoffroy et al, 2015) (in combination with Alamut Batch, Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France) and by AnnotSV (Geoffroy et al, 2018a). Variant effect on the nearest splice site was predicted using MaxEntScan (Yeo & Burge, 2004), NNSplice (Reese et al, 1997) and Splice Site Finder (Shapiro & Senapathy, 1987). Very stringent filtering criteria were applied to filter out non‐pathogenic variants: (i) variants represented with an allele frequency of more than 1% in public variation databases including the 1000 Genomes (1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al, 2015), the gnomAD database (Lek et al, 2016), the DGV (MacDonald et al, 2014) or our internal exome database, and (ii) variants in 5′ and 3′ UTR, downstream, upstream, intronic and synonymous locations without pathogenic prediction of local splice effect. The PSMC3 nomenclature is based on the accession number NM_002804.4 from the RefSeq database (O'Leary et al, 2016). Genomic coordinates are defined according to GRCh37/hg19 assembly downloaded from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) genome browser (Tyner et al, 2017).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genetic Screening for MODY Subtypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We undertook targeted next-generation sequencing of BLK, PAX4, and KLF11 as well as HNF1A and HNF4A for probands suspected to have MODY, as previously described (6 (link)). Targets were covered at a mean read depth of 460X per base, and all bases had a mean coverage depth of at least 30 reads across the cohort. Variants were annotated against Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37 (GRCh37) with Alamut Batch (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France) using a RefSeq transcript: BLK NM_001715.3, KLF11 NM_003597.4, PAX4 NM_001366110.1, HNF1A NM_000545.6, and HNF4A NM_175914.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Analysis of Oral-Facial-Digital Syndrome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The customized panel for oral–facial–digital (OFD) syndrome included five genes: C2CD3, CPLANE1, DDX59, OFD1, and TCTN3. Baits for the OFD gene panel and whole-exome sequencing (WES), which targeted on comprehensive medical exomes, were purchased from Agilent. Both the targeted sequencing library and the WES library for patient 33 were constructed using the Agilent SureSelect clinical research exome kit, except that the hybrid captures were performed using different baits as described above. Sequencing was conducted on a NextSeq550 sequencer (Illumina) with 100 bp paired-end reads. The DNA sequence was aligned to the human reference genome (UCSC hg19). We built a sequence processing pipeline for analyzing both the targeted gene panel and the WES data by incorporating two commercial software, CLC biomedical genomic workbench from QIAGEN and AlamutBatch from Interactive Biosoftware. The evaluation and the classification of variants were performed following the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) recommendations (Richards et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ABCA4 Variant Analysis for Rare Noncoding Mutations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, variants within ABCA4 (NM_00350.2) were investigated. After identifying known pathogenic variants, only variants with MAF ≤1% in the aforementioned population databases were selected. Per individual, all remaining rare noncoding variants within ABCA4 were analyzed for predicted effects on splice sites, exonic splice enhancers (ESEs), and splice silencers using splice annotations of Alamut Batch, Alamut Visual (Interactive Biosoftware, France), and Human Splicing Finder (http://www.umd.be/HSF3/). Second, variants located within putative regulatory regions in the enriched locus were selected and annotated (unpublished data, Cherry et al., 10.1101/412361, RegulomeDB). In the absence of candidate variants, rare ABCA4 variants outside of the regulatory regions were also investigated. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for validation are listed in Table S5. If possible, segregation results were used for filtering.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!