The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

19 protocols using dna prep stain

1

Hepatocyte Cell Cycle Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cell cycle of hepatocytes was analyzed as described previously.40 (link) Hepatocytes were isolated from PH livers, and 0.5×106 cells were fixed for 30 minutes in 10 mL of 70% ethanol at 4°C. After centrifugation at 40× g for 5 minutes, the cells were resuspended in PBS with 20 µg/mL DNase-free RNase and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. For PI staining, the cells were incubated with 2 mL DNA Prep Stain (Beckman Coulter Inc.) for 30 minutes. The fluorescence was measured by an EPICS XL-MCL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc.) using a 575 nm band-pass filter, and analyzed with EXPO32 ADC software (Beckman Coulter Inc.), or an FC500 Flow Cytometry System with Multicycle Software for Windows (Beckman Coulter Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell clumps were collected and centrifuged and pellets were trypsinized and washed twice with PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Adherent and ground control cells were trypsinized and washed twice with PBS. Cells were fixed with 70% ethanol at 4°C for 24 h and stained with DNA PREP Stain (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, USA) at 4°C overnight. Stained cells were measured by flow cytometry. Cell cycle analysis was performed three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Cycle Analysis of PDAC Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Indicated PDAC cells were harvested 72 h after indicated treatment. Then the cells were fixed in 75% ethanol overnight at −20°C after washed with PBS. Then the cells were washed with PBS for twice and applied with DNA Prep Stain (Beckman Coulter, USA) and RNase for 30 min. Next, the cell cycle analysis was performed by Flow Cytometry System with FACSDiva software. The data were analyzed by ModFit LT 3.2 software (Verity Software House, USA) and the cell cycle distribution was described as the percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2 populations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Indicated HCC cells were harvested 72 h after indicated treatment. Then the cells were fixed in 75% ethanol overnight at –20°C after washed with PBS. Then the cells were washed with PBS for twice and applied with DNA Prep Stain (Beckman Coulter, USA) and RNase for 30 min. Next, the cell cycle analysis was performed by Flow Cytometry System with FACSDiva software. The data were analyzed by ModFit LT 3.2 software (Verity Software House, USA) and the cell cycle distribution was described as the percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2 populations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Cycle Analysis of Bladder Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 48 h transfection, UM-UC-3 and T24 cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 75% ethanol at ?20°C. After 24 h fixation, the cells were washed with PBS and treated with DNA Prep Stain (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) for 30 min. Cell cycle analysis was conducted by BD LSRII Flow Cytometry System with FACSDiva software (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, USA). The cell cycle distribution was illustrated as the percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2 populations and data was evaluated by ModFit LT software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control or H2A.Z knockdown cells (2×105) were seeded into 6-well plates, and incubated for 48 h. The cells were then harvested and fixed in 75% ethanol at −20°C for 24 h. Following fixation, the cells were resuspended and washed one time with PBS. Next, 200 µl DNA PREP Stain (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) was added and the suspension was incubated in the dark for 20 min at room temperature. Cell cycle analysis was performed by flow cytometry, using a BD LSR II instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Modfit LT version 5 was used for the analysis.
Cell apoptosis assays were performed as previously described (22 (link)). Specifically, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays were performed to evaluate apoptosis, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Effects on PMNL

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PMNL (1 × 106/mL) were treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban at a final concentration of 10 μM for 120 min at 37 °C, followed in succession by a 10 min exposure of the cells to propidium iodide (DNA prepstain, Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA, 50 μg/mL) at room temperature and flow cytometric detection of uptake of propidium iodide as a marker of cell membrane damage expressed as % viable cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Dolutegravir Effect on Neutrophil Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was measured after a 15 min incubation period following the addition of DMSO (resting control) or dolutegravir (10 μg/mL) to neutrophils (1 × 106 /mL) using a flow cytometric propidium iodide-based dye exclusion assay. The cells were incubated for 10 min with propidium iodide (50 μg/mL, DNA Prep-Stain, Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA), and cell viability was assessed using a FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). The results are expressed as the percentages of viable cells. The analysis was performed using FlowJo version 10.8.1 for Windows (BD BioSciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Bisector gates were applied to distinguish between propidium iodide negative (viable cells) and propidium iodide positive populations (apoptotic cells) in the control. The same gates were applied to all subsequent samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Proliferation and Cell Cycle Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For proliferation assay, cells were seeded in 35 mm Petri dish at a concentration of 5 × 104 cells/dish in a complete medium. Cells cultured on ground or on RPM for 24, 48 and 72 h were counted with a particle count and size analyzer (Beckman-Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) and by a Thoma hemocytometer. Three independent experiments in duplicate were performed. For cell cycle analysis, cell clumps were collected and centrifuged and pellets were trypsinized and washed twice with PBS (Phosphate Buffered Saline, Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Adherent and ground control cells were trypsinized and washed twice with PBS. Cells were fixed with 70% ethanol at 4 °C for 24 h and stained with DNA PREP Stain (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, USA) at 4 °C overnight. Stained cells were measured by flow cytometry. Cell cycle analysis was performed three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested at 48 h following transfection and fixed in 75% ethanol at −20°C. Following fixing overnight, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stained with DNA Prep Stain (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) for 30 min. Cell cycle analysis was performed using the BD LSRII Flow Cytometry system with FACSDiva software version 6.0 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The data were analyzed with the ModFit LT 5.0 software package (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!