The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

97 protocols using autopore 4 9500

1

BET Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution of Eggshell CaCO3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The five-point BET method was utilized
to calculate the BET surface
area of ESP using AutoPore IV 9,500, Micromeritics Instrument, USA.
BET was measured in duplicate with nitrogen at a constant temperature
(77.4 K) after degassing 0.35g of the sample for 12 to 15 h at room
temperature. Pore size distribution of eggshell CaCO3 was
determined with the same instrument. Mercury intrusion at low pressures
ranged from 3.59 to 206.64 kPa. The pressure during the high-pressure
mercury intrusion varied from 206.64 kPa to 206.78 MPa. Equilibration
took 10 s for both high-pressure intrusion and low-pressure intrusion.9 (link),10
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Brick Porosity Analysis for Durability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pore size and the space between pores are two brick properties considerably affected their durability [29 ,30 (link)]. Assessing these parameters is crucial in establishing the specifications for replacement bricks. The porosity of the tested bricks was determined with an AutoPore IV 9500 mercury porosimeter (Micromeritics, Atlanta, GA, USA). Three test samples were taken from each type of brick. The samples, drilled from the parent material, were cylindrical in shape (approximately 13.0 mm in diameter and 17.0 mm in height). Dust was removed from the surface of the samples using compressed air. Before testing, the samples were dried to a constant weight. The porosity distribution was determined during the test, using a working pressure of up to 33,000 Psi. Penetrometers, with a measuring vessel capacity of 3 cc and 0.4 cc and in different capillaries, were used for the tests. The study allowed the determination of porosity structure, pore distribution, mean pore diameter, and total porosity. Pores ranging from 300.00 μm to 0.006 μm were distinguished.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Microsphere Porosity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inner pore size distribution and porosity of microspheres were determined by Mercury Injection Apparatus (AutoPore IV 9500, Micromeritics). For the glass transition temperature of mixture (PLA and PELA) measurement, lyophilized mixture was analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC Q2000). The process of antigen penetrating into microcapsule inner structures was observed by CLSM TCS SP8 (Leica, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pore Structure Analysis of BCSA Cement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pore structure of BCSA cement samples was measured on day 28 by Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). MIP was measured by Micromeritics AutoPore IV9500 (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation) with a contact angle of 140° at 25 °C. The maximum and minimum pressures were set at 414 MPa and 1.4 kPa, respectively. The samples were cut into 5 mm cubes and stopped the cement hydration by the acetone-solvent exchange for 12 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Osteoinductive Artificial Bone Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Commercial osteoinductive CaP ceramics (Trade name: Osteoinductive artificial bone) were supplied by Engineering Research Center in Biomaterials, Sichuan University, China. This ceramic was composed of hydroxyapatite (HA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), and the ratio of HA to β-TCP was about 20/80. The sterilized samples (γ-ray irradiation) with the size of Φ 10 × 5 mm3 were used in this study. The morphology, porous structure and permeability were analyzed by field emission scanning microscopy (S4800, Hitachi, Japan) and automatic mercury porosimeter (AutoPore IV 9500, Micromeritics, America), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fabrication and Characterization of Gelatin/BGM Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gelatin/BGM scaffolds were fabricated using a freeze-drying method according to our previous report (Guo et al., 2017 (link); Zhao et al., 2018a (link)). Briefly, BGM (28 g) and gelatin (12 g, Aladdin) were dispersed in deionized water (200 ml), followed by stirring for 4 h at 40°C. Three milliliters of genipin solution (1 wt%) was added to the above solution, and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 20 min, frozen for 12 h at −20°C and then freeze-dried for another 24 h. SEM (Zeiss Sigma 300, Germany) and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP, Micromeritics AutoPore IV 9500, United States) were used to examine the morphology and porous structure of the scaffolds. To analyze the content of the BGM, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Mettler TGA/DSC3+, Switzerland) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pore Size Analysis of Anodes Using Mercury Intrusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pore size distribution and specific surface area of the anodes were determined using a mercury intrusion technique (Micromeritics AutoPore IV 9500). Mercury was pushed into the sample from 6.9 kPa (1 psia) to a maximum pressure of 206 843 kPa (30 000 psia). The relationship between this pressure (P) and the pore diameter (D) can be found through the Washburn equation assuming the pores are cylindrical,58 ,59
D = –4γ cos(θ)/P where γ is the surface tension of mercury (485 mN m–1), θ is the contact angle (130°) acting along the parameter of the pore. The pore size diameter is plotted as a function of the differential intrusion (ml g–1 Å–1) which is found by dividing the incremental intrusion (ml g–1) by the difference in pore diameter (Å). The specific pore area (A) is then calculated (A = 4V/D) assuming a cylinder pore volume (V = πD2h/4) and open cylinder pore area (A = πDh). For each specific surface area measurement the contribution from the macro (∼75 μm) and meso (∼1 μm) pores while the contribution from the micropores (∼10 nm) could not be determined as the foams collapsed at the higher pressures (∼400 psia), a known problem when examining soft foams with mercury porosimetry.58 ,59
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of 3D Printed Biomimetic Cages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biomimetic gradient porous structure of the 3D printed cages were characterized by the SEM (Hitachi, Japan). The gradient porous properties of Gyroid structure were evaluated through mercury intrusion porosimetry (AutoPore IV 9500, Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, China). The surface roughness of the 3D printed cages was characterized by the laser confocal microscopy (Lecia DCM8, Germany), then the surface roughness was evaluated with machine-assisted software [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pore Structure Analysis of SiC and Si3N4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 16

Pore Structure Analysis. BET surface areas were determined with N2-sorption porosimetry at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 surface area and porosity analyzer. Samples for N2-sorption analysis were outgassed for 24 h at 80° C. under a vacuum before analysis. The pore size distribution of both the SiC and Si3N4 objects was also investigated with Hg-intrusion porosimetry using a Micromeritics AutoPore IV 9500 instrument.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Porous Glass Microspheres

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The porosity of the porous microspheres was evaluated via mercury intrusion porosimetry (Micromeritics Autopore IV 9500). A 5 cc powder penetrometer (Micromeritics) with 1 cc intrusion volume was used for all of the glass formulations investigated. Before running the samples, an empty penetrometer test was also carried out as a blank. The porosity of the microspheres was also calculated using the following eqn (2). To determine the degradation rate, the microspheres were dried at 50 °C overnight and then weighted using a precision scale (Sartorius CP 225D). The percentage of mass loss was calculated according to the following eqn (3):
where M 0 is the initial mass (mg) of microspheres and M t is the mass obtained at each time point. The pH of the solution was measured using a microprocessor pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland) previously calibrated using standard pH buffer solutions of pH 4.0, pH 7.0 and pH 10.0 (Fisher Scientific, UK). The concentration of boron, sodium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorous and potassium ions was determined by ICP-MS (Thermo-Fisher iCAP-Q model, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!