The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ivis instrument

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The IVIS instrument is a high-performance in vivo imaging system designed for preclinical research applications. It enables the detection and quantification of bioluminescent and fluorescent signals from small animal models. The IVIS instrument provides researchers with a non-invasive method to study biological processes and track the progression of disease models over time.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using ivis instrument

1

Monitoring PCC NPs In Vivo with IR-820 Dye

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IR-820 is a NIR fluorescent dye that can be used to monitor PCC NPs. Two xenograft models were chosen to determine the in vivo distribution of PCC NPs. Two hundred microliters of the PCC NPs dispersed liquid with 20 μg/ml IR-820 was intravenously injected into mice. Another mouse was injected with an equal concentration of IR-820 solution as the control. Fluorescent signals were observed with an IVIS instrument (Perkin Elmer, MA, USA) at sequential time points after injection. Mice were euthanized after observation, and their organs and tumors were collected. The tissues were observed using an IVIS instrument with the same parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In vivo Distribution of CRNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in vivo distribution of CRNPs was investigated in C57BL/6 mice bearing EO771 orthotopic tumor. Briefly, 1 × 106 of EO771 cells per mouse were administered into the left abdominal mammary fat pad of C57BL/6 mice. When the volume of tumor reached approximately 100 mm3, mice were randomly distributed into three groups and intravenously injected with PBS, free CPT&Cy5-siR, or CPT&Cy5-siR CRNPs. The doses of CPT and Cy5-siR were 2.0 mg kg−1 and 30 µg kg−1, respectively. At 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, whole-animal images of all mice were acquired using a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) IVIS instrument. Moreover, circulation of CRNPs in blood was also studied by collecting blood from the mice at various time points and imaged by the IVIS system. At the end of the study, mice were euthanized and their critical organs including hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, kidneys, and tumors were harvested and imaged by IVIS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In vivo Tumor Imaging with ICG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in vivo imaging studies, after the tumor reached ~5 mm in diameter, the mice were injected with 100 μl saline, 50 μg ICG in 100 μl saline, and HAC-PFP nanoparticles loaded with ICG (ICG: 50 μg) in 100 μl saline. In vivo fluorescence images were taken at 3 and 6 h after intravenous injection via the tail vein using a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) IVIS instrument with excitation at 780 nm and an 831 nm filter to collect the fluorescence emission of ICG. After in vivo imaging, the mice were sacrificed and the tumor, liver, kidney, lung, spleen, and heart were removed and collected for further ex vivo fluorescence imaging of ICG in the organs using the same IVIS instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Vivo Tumor Imaging with Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For in vivo imaging, after the tumor reached ~5 mm in long diameter, the mice were injected with 100 μl saline, 100 μg ICG in 100 μl saline, HC60S-DI nanoparticles (DOX: 100 μg and ICG: 100 μg for both low and high drug loading content nanoparticles) in 100 μl saline. In vivo fluorescence images were taken at 6 h after intravenous injection via the tail vein using a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) IVIS instrument with excitation at 780 nm and an 831 nm filter to collect the fluorescence emission of ICG. After in vivo imaging, the mice were sacrificed and the tumor, liver, kidney, lung, spleen, and heart were removed and collected for further ex vivo fluorescence imaging of ICG using the same IVIS instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Modeling BCR-ABL1 Leukemia in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female Nod-SCID mice were purchased from Jackson Labs at 9 weeks of age. At 12 weeks of age, mice were injected by tail vein with 1×106 Ba/F3 cells transduced with pMIG-BCR-ABL1T315I/H396R and pMMP-luciferase-hygromycin (Ridges et al., 2012 (link)) (kindly provided by Dr. Michael Engel, The University of Utah). Oral drug delivery was initiated 72 hr later. Mice received 50 μL of drug in solvent SCIE (66.25 mM sucrose, 13.25 mM citric acid, 40% isopropanol, and 6.7% ethanol; see below). Animals were dosed with asciminib (30 mg/kg), ponatinib (25 mg/kg), or the combination once daily. Luciferase was imaged on days 14 and 21 post-injection on a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA) IVIS instrument. Dosing was held if mice lost >10% of body weight and maintained this loss on two consecutive days or if a mouse lost 4 grams in 24 hours. Mice were re-enrolled if they gained two grams or more. Mice were euthanized upon exhibiting signs of suffering, generally including lack of response to stimuli and/or lethargy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Biodistribution of Nanoreactors in Glioblastoma Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female C57BL/6 mice (7–8 weeks) were purchased from Beijing HFK Bioscience Co., Ltd. GL261-luc glioblastoma-bearing C57BL/6 mice were generated as described in our previous report. C57BL/6 mice were anesthetized and fixed, and GL261-luc cells (5 × 104 cells suspended in 5 μL of serum-free DMEM) were implanted into the right striatum of C57BL/6 mice using a 10-μL Hamilton syringe. GL261 glioblastoma-bearing mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 5) 10 days after the implantation.
To detect biodistribution of the nanoreactors, we replaced DOX with rhodamine B (RB, a fluorescent dye) [30] . Mice were intravenously injected with free RB, RB@MTP, RB/HA-EGCG, and RB@MTP/HA-EGCG. The RB dose was 10 mg/kg. All mice were examined 2, 6, 10, 12, and 24 h after the injection using a PerkinElmer IVIS instrument with excitation at 520 nm and emission at 620 nm. Mice were sacrificed, and the brain and major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney) were harvested 24 h later for ex vivo imaging of RB.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Systemic Delivery of Cy5-siRNA Polypwraplex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the distribution of systemic delivery of Cy5-siRNA polypwraplex required utilization of tumor models performed by inoculating U87MG cells to male BALB/c nude mice under the right armpits skin (2 × 106 cells). When the tumor was allowed to mature (volume 150–200 mm3), mice were divided into naked Cy5-labeled siRNA, Cy5-labeled siRNA polyplex, and Cy5-labeled siRNA polywraplex groups randomly. Each of the groups was intravenously injected with dosage form at the dose of 0.5 mg/Kg, respectively. After 24 h, the tissues of mice were harvested and fluorescence image using IVIS instrument (PerkinElmer) was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating In Vivo Release of Labeled IgG and IL-12 from Liposomal Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SKH1E nude immunocompetent mice were used to assess the release behavior of LNHs containing labeled IgG and IL-12. Mice were subcutaneously injected in the hind flank with a 100 μL volume of either a bolus solution or a liposomal hydrogel. Each injection administered 10 μg of mouse IgG antibody and 12.5 μg of human IL-12. Isotype control IgG and human IL-12 were chosen for this study because both cargo were expected to have minimal immunoactivity, which would simplify our experimental system. Mice were imaged sequentially using a PerkinElmer IVIS instrument using automatic exposure acquisition settings. Mice were imaged immediately before injection, 30 minutes after injection, 1 hour after injection, 7 hours after injection, and then daily thereafter. Data were analyzed in the LivingImage software. Analysis consisted of defining a region of interest over the injection site or hydrogel, and exporting the total radiant efficiency measured in that region. Data were normalized to the maximum signal recorded during the study and then plotted in PRISM. Sample was n=3 for the bolus condition and n=4 for the liposomal hydrogel condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Vivo Cancer Cell Lung Colonization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metastatic lung colonization assays were performed by injecting cancer cells stably expressing luciferase into mice via tail vein (5 × 104 to 2.5 × 105 cells per mouse for MDA-Par and MDA-LM2 and 1 × 105 cells per mouse for HCC1806-LM2 cells). For the lung colonization experiment conducted with ferrostatin-1 and NAC pretreatment, MDA-LM2 NQO1 knockdown cells were treated with 1 µM ferrostatin-1 or 5 mM NAC for 1 h before injection. In vivo bioluminescence was measured by retro-orbital injection of luciferin (PerkinElmer) followed by imaging with an IVIS instrument (PerkinElmer). At the endpoint, lungs were extracted, fixed with PFA and subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging of AuNR-PEG-Ab

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
When the tumor volume reached ~100 mm3 in long diameter, AuNR-PEG-Ab (30 μg Ab), Ab (30 μg) and 5×Ab (150 μg) were degermed by 0.22μm filter membrane and intravenous injected in each mouse. Fluorescence imaging was performed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h after injection, using a PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) IVIS instrument with excitation at 650 nm and an 680 nm filter to collect the fluorescence emission of Cy5. Mice were euthanized, the major organs (liver, lung, spleen, kidney and heart) and tumor were dissected and imaging were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!