The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using leica sp5 inverted confocal microscope

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Pluripotency and Lineage Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 1 h and immunofluorescently analysed as described previously (Niakan and Eggan, 2013 (link)). The primary antibodies (all at 1:500 dilution) used include: anti-Oct4 (sc-5279, sc-8628 or sc-9081, Santa Cruz Biotech), anti-Nanog (AF1997 R&D, REC-RCAB0001P 2B Scientific, or ab21624, Abcam), anti-Cdx2 (MU392A-UC, Biogenex), anti-Klf17 (HPA024629, Atlas), anti-Ap2γ (AF5059, R&D), anti-Sox17 (AF1924, R&D) and anti-Foxa2 (3143, Cell Signaling). Embryos were imaged on a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confocal Microscopy of Live/Dead Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pegs designated for confocal microscopy were snapped off the lid using sterile tweezers and stained with a SYTO 9/propidium iodide (LIVE/DEAD, BacLight; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) solution. The pegs were incubated, covered from the light, for 20 min. After incubation, the pegs were rinsed in PBS and placed on 50 mm glass-bottom dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA). The pegs were imaged using a Leica SP5 Inverted Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) at a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels using a 63× water immersion objective (63×/1.2W).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Intracellular localization of FeCaP nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were fixed with methanol for 10 min. The cytoplasm was stained with neutral red (pink) and then stained with Prussian blue (blue) to highlight the iron-laden particles. Light microscopy images were generated at 1, 3, 6 and 24 h post-exposure to 5, 10 and 25 µg/mL of FeCaP NPs. Confocal fluorescence microscopy was also used to establish intracellular FeCaP NP localization using 3D image analysis of TT1 cells. TT1 cells were grown to high confluence and exposed to 25 μg/mL FeCaP NPs in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium. Cells were washed to remove apical FeCaP excess then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Samples were then incubated for 15 min at room temperature with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) stain conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (1:100; Invitrogen™, Waltham, MA, USA) to reveal the cell membrane. Cells were washed in PBS and then counter-stained with DAPI (1:100; Invitrogen™, Waltham, MA, USA) for 15 min at RT and rinsed 3 times with PBS before imaging. FeCaP particles were revealed using a 488 nm laser and PMT2 483–496 nm for reflection. Z-Stacks of 3 different samples were taken using the Leica SP5 inverted Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with an optical zoom of 63×. The Z-Stacks depth was chosen in order to include the entire height of the TT1 cells monolayer. Image analysis was performed using the FIJI image analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Confocal Imaging of Polymer 1a

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal microscopy was performed on a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Rijswijk, The Netherlands) with a 40× water immersion objective. Samples were prepared by dissolution of the polymer 1a in 0.1 M NaOH solution. The solution was transferred to wells and 1 M HCl solution was added to neutralize the sample. The final concentration of the polymer was 1 wt %. Nile Red (purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands) at a final concentration of 5 μM was used as lipophilic dye to visualize the hydrophobic domains in the polymer network. Images were obtained by illumination of the sample with a laser at 550 nm and collecting fluorescence from 575 to 700 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of c-Fos in EM-Treated Spheroids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After exposure to the EM field, spheroids (DIV 21) were fixed in paraformaldehyde (PFA, 4% v/v, Santa Cruz Biotechnology 30525-89-4) for 2 h. All the following steps were performed on a shaker at 4°C. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-cFos (Cell Signaling 2250, 1:500) and Alexa488 goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen A11034, 1:1000). Spheroids were permeabilized and blocked with Triton X-100 (TX, 0.2%, Sigma T9284) and bovine serum albumin (BSA, 10%, Sigma A9647) in PBS for 1 h, and subsequently incubated in primary antibodies diluted in 0.2% TX and 3% BSA in PBS (B-PBT) overnight. Spheroids underwent 3 washes (15 min each) with 0.2% TX in PBS (PBT) before incubation with secondary antibodies in B-PBT for 2 h. After that, spheroids underwent 3 washes (15 min each) with PBT and then were incubated with Hoechst (BD Biosciences 561908, 1:300) in PBT for 1 h and returned to PBS where they were kept before being transferred to glass-bottomed confocal dishes for imaging. All images were acquired with 40x objective lenses using a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems). For each condition, the maximum intensity projection of a Z-stack from approximately half spheroid (from the bottom to the maximum diameter) is displayed. The quantification was done by counting c-Fos+ cells and nuclei from each confocal image using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

3D Confocal Imaging and Reconstruction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were collected on a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope with a 63 × NA 1.4 oil immersion objective (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Images were acquired with thin z-stack for 3D reconstruction using Imaris, Image analysis software (Bitplane Inc., South Windsor, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Staining of Fixed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h or overnight at 4°C, permeabilized with 0.5% Tween in 1× PBS for 20 min, and blocked with 10% FBS diluted in 0.1% Tween in 1× PBS for 1 h. Primary antibodies were diluted at 1:500 in blocking solution, and samples were incubated overnight at 4°C rotating. Secondary antibodies were diluted at 1:300 in blocking solution, and samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature, washed, and covered with 0.1% Tween in 1× PBS containing DAPI VectaShield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). A list of the antibodies used is in Supplemental Table S7. Images were taken on either an Olympus 1X71 microscope with Cell^F software (Olympus Corporation), a Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope with AxioVision release 4.7 software (Carl Zeiss Ltd.), or a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems Ltd).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Confocal Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was performed using a Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a Nikon Plan Apochromat λ 10× objective (0.45 NA) and the NIS-Elements software (version 4.51.01). The images were acquired using 2 or 3 laser lines with excitation wavelengths of 405 nm (DAPI), 488 nm (Alexa Fluor 488), and 561 nm (Rhodamine-phalloidin) with the detection windows set accordingly. Z-stacks were obtained at an xy-resolution of 0.60 × 0.60 µm and a z-spacing of 1 µm (for specific cases) to 5 µm (nominal cases). The acquisition in the different channels was performed sequentially to minimize inter-channel cross-talk. The images in Fig. 8 and Supplementary Figs. 79 were acquired using a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with a Leica HC PL APO 10× objective (0.40 NA) with Leica LAS AF software (version 2.7.3) under equivalent conditions as listed above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization and Cryosectioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WISH and double fluorescent WISH were conducted as previously described[12 (link),43 (link)], using established DIG-labelled or fluorescein labelled anti-sense RNA probes including runx1, foxc1b, dlc, dld, cmyb, gata1, fli1a, kdrl, dll4, cdh17, rag1, and jam2[7 (link),10 (link)]. Antisense probes for snai2, snai1a, snai1b, and pax9 were designed to target the entire coding region. Following WISH, selected embryos were processed for cryosectioning, according to standard procedures on the Leica CM1860 Cryostat at 10 μm thickness. WISH and Cryosections were imaged on a DFC295 digital camera using the Leica FireCam Software. All confocal images of double fluorescent in situ hybridization and fluorescent transgenic embryos were obtained with a Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Intravital Imaging of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All imaging experiments were performed at Biological Imaging Section (NIH, NIAID) using Leica SP5 inverted confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems) equipped with dual Mai Tai lasers as previously described [57 (link)]. Mouse surgery for imaging the iLN was performed according to the Cold Spring Harbor protocol [58 ] modified for the inverted microscope setup. For imaging neutrophil recruitments from the BM mice were injected intravenously with KC+AMD3100 (AMD 3100 octahydrochloride; Recombinant Mouse CXCL1/KC CF; R&D Systems). Mouse calvarium BM was imaged as described [42 ], using upright microscope setup and a custom-made stage with the head holder (NIH Division of Scientific Equipment and Instrumentation Services). Post-acquisition image processing was performed using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health), Imaris (Bitplane) and Huygens (Scientific Volume Imaging) software. Detailed description of the imaging technique is provided in supporting information (S3 Text).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!