The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sequencher program

Manufactured by Gene Codes
Sourced in United States

Sequencher is a DNA sequence analysis software program developed by Gene Codes. It provides core functions for assembling and analyzing DNA sequence data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using sequencher program

1

Cloning and Sequencing of SV-A

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 983 bp RT-PCR product derived from CPE-positive cell culture was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen) and cloned into the plasmid vector pCR4-TOPO (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer’s protocols. DNA sequences of the plasmid inserts were confirmed using an ABI 3900 automated sequencer (Life Technologies). Sequences were assembled using Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corporation) and confirmed to be SV-A using the BLAST function of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phylogenetic Analysis of Viral Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequence data were stored as standard chromatogram format files and assembled by using Sequencher program (version 5.4.5) (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI). VP1 sequence alignments were performed with MEGA software (version 7.0) (Sudhir Kumar, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ) to select the evolution model of the phylogenetic tree. TempEst software (version 1.5.3) was used to assess whether there was sufficient temporal signal in the data to proceed with phylogenetic molecular clock analysis. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the maximum likelihood method with the TN93 + strict clock evolution model. The reliability of the tree was estimated with 1000 bootstrap replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bioinformatic Sequence Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the detailed edition of the sequences was used BioEdit program, whose version is available at http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/page2.html.
For sequence comparison and annealing, we used the Sequencher program from Gene Codes Corporation, whose demo copy of version 5.2.4 is available at www.genecodes.com.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EBV Sequence Variant and Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primers used for determining LMP-1 sequence variation and EBNA-2 typing are listed in Table 4. The LMP-1 primers were those of van Kooij et al.6 (link) with modifications. The EBNA-2 primers were those described by Higa et al.15 (link) with minor modifications. PCR was performed in an ABI 9700 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The program consisted of 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 60 s, followed by 72 °C for 10 min after which the temperature was reduced to 4 °C and held. PCR products were run in a 1% agarose gel. The Namalwa cell line (ATCC CRL1422), which contains two integrated copies of EBV per cell,16 (link) was used as the positive control and the negative control contained no template. EBNA-2 genotyping was based on the nested PCR product size: type 1 was 497 bp and type 2 was 162 bp. LMP-1 PCR products were purified with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Purified PCR products were sequenced by the University of Minnesota's Advanced Genetic Analysis Center using an ABI 3100 DNA sequencer and Big Dye chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Chromatograms were compared with the EBV B95-8 reference strain using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validation of POU1F1 Variant via Sanger Sequencing and Taqman

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The identified POU1F1 variant was confirmed and validated with Sanger sequencing and Taqman genotyping. Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/) (Rozen and Skaletsky. 2000 (link)) was used to design the following Sanger sequencing primers; 5′-CCAGGAAAAGTGTGATCGGG-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCCATCTCCTCTGTACGTTTTG-3′ (reverse). Biotools DNA Polymerase (Biotools B&M Labs, S.A.) was used to perform PCR amplification, Sanger sequencing reactions were performed at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), and the obtained Sanger sequence data were analysed with the Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corporation). After initial Sanger confirmation, a custom Taqman SNP genotyping assay (ThermoFisher Scientific) was ordered to genotype the POU1F1 variant in larger sample cohorts. The primer and probe sequences for the assay were the following: 5′-TTTGCATTGTTTTAGAAAGAAAATTTGAAACTCAAA-3′ and 5′-CCTTTTTCTTTCATTTGCTCCCACTT-3′ (forward and reverse, respectively), 5′-VIC-ATTCCCCATTACAGCTTT-3′ and 5′-FAM-CTCACCGTAGTCCCCCAT-3′ (reference and variant allele, respectively). The Taqman genotyping reactions were carried out using Biorad’s CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System. The utilised canine POU1F1 reference sequences were NM_001006949.1 and NP_001006950.1 for mRNA and protein, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Variant Analysis of PRRT2 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). We performed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and direct sequencing of all coding exons and their flanking sequences for the PRRT2 gene using primer pairs designed by the authors (available upon request). PCR was performed in a Verti® thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and cycle sequencing was performed using an ABI Prism 3100×l Genetic Analyzer with the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit (Applied Biosystems). Sequence variations were analyzed with reference to the wild-type sequence (RefSeq No. NM_145239.2) using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cloning and Sequencing of GULP1-EPC2 Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primers localized in exon 1 of GULP1 and exon 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 of EPC2 were used to amplify the fusion from cDNA and the products were cloned using the TA Cloning® kit with pCR™2.1 Vector and One Shot® TOP10F’ chemically competent E. coli (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). Clones were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. A total of 50 ng of the DNA was used for a conventional PCR reaction using 0.1 U of Taq polymerase (Axon Labortechnik, Kaiserslautern, Germany). A total of 0.4 mM of each primer, 200 mM dNTP mix, 1.5 mM MgCl2 as well as 0.2 M betaine and the following PCR conditions: an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 5 min, 36 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 60 s, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were purified by an enzymatic method using 10 U of exonuclease I (biolabs) and 2 U of shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) for 30 min at 37 °C and 15 min at 80 °C and sequenced by StarSEQ GmbH (Mainz, Germany). The sequences were compared to the reference sequence using Sequencher program (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Molecular Identification of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained PCR products of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia were gel-purified and cloned into a pCR2.1 vector using a TA Cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Escherichia coli DH5α (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) was transformed with the recombinant plasmids. Ten clones were selected randomly for each PCR product and the insert DNA of each clone was sequenced. Other PCR products were purified and sequenced directly. All obtained sequences were assembled and translated into protein sequences using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA). Homology searches and species identification were performed using blastn or blastp (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Phylogenetic analysis of the flaB, glpQ, gltA, p28/omp-1, and p44/msp2 sequences were performed using MEGA 7 with 1000 bootstrap replicates [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping APE1 T1349G Polymorphism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping assays to evaluate the APE1 T1349G polymorphism were performed by sequencing cDNA samples. The PCR amplification was carried out in the Veriti® Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems) by using the primers 5′-GCTTCGAGCCTGGATTAAGAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GGCCTGCATTAGGTACATATGCT-3′ (reverse) to amplify the target fragment of APE1. PCR conditions were 94°C (10 min), followed by 40 cycles of 94°C (45 sec), 50°C (30 sec), and 72°C (30 sec), and subsequent final extension at 72°C (5 min). PCR products were purified by using GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA sequencing was carried out on the Sequencer 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and the results were analyzed with the Sequencher Program (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) using the reference sequence from NCBI (NM_001244249.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

BRAF Mutation Screening via MEMO-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
(MEMO-PCR) and direct sequencing was performed as described previously (Lee et al. 2012) (link). The obtained sequences were analyzed using the Sequencher program (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and were compared to a reference sequence (GenBank accession number NM_004333.4). BRAF mutation was tested in 322 available cases.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!