The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chemidoc xrs imaging system

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States, Germany, China, United Kingdom, Italy, Canada, France, Portugal, Spain, Japan

The ChemiDoc XRS+ imaging system is a compact, high-performance imaging system designed for a variety of life science applications. It utilizes a cooled CCD camera and various illumination sources to capture images of gels, blots, and other samples during common laboratory procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

1 327 protocols using chemidoc xrs imaging system

1

Characterization of Thermostable and Proteolysis-Resistant Enzymes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each enzyme composing the mixture (Mix; Provisional Patent number 20191000008190, INPI) was biochemically characterized, in particular for thermostability and proteolysis resistance. The thermostability analysis was performed, according to Coelho et al. (2019). As the temperature of incubation increased, the amount of protein in the supernatant reduced. This was validated by running 14% SDS‐PAGE gels in the supernatants and visualizing the intensity of the band. The resultant images were acquired with Bio‐Rad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio‐Rad). To evaluate the proteolysis resistance, each enzyme was incubated with porcine pancreatin (VWR Chemicals), as described by Coelho et al. (2019). The samples were then removed and analysed by 14% SDS‐PAGE gels. The proteolysis was confirmed by visualizing fragments with different molecular weights. The resultant images were once again acquired with Bio‐Rad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio‐Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Thermostable and Proteolysis-Resistant Alginate Lyase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The alginate lyase was biochemically characterized, specifically for thermostability and proteolysis resistance. The recombinant enzyme was purified through IMAC using gravity flow columns (His GraviTrap™, GE Healthcare, IL, USA), according to a previously described procedure29 (link),30 . The protein concentration was adjusted at 0.83 g/L for both assays. The thermostability analysis was performed as previously reported27 (link). The protein concentration in the recovered supernatant was quantified in triplicate using a NanoDrop 2000/2000c (NanoDrop Technologies; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, USA), and the results were validated through visualization of 14% SDS-PAGE gels, showing the intensity of the bands present in the supernatants. The gel images were acquired with BioRad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The proteolysis resistance analysis was performed as already described27 (link). The alginate lyase was incubated with porcine pancreatin (VWR Chemicals, West Chester, PA, USA) or PBS solution and, afterwards, the samples were analysed by 14% SDS-PAGE and compared to a low molecular weight (LMW) protein marker (18.5 to 96 KDa) (Nzytech, Portugal) (Fig. 5). The resultant images were acquired with BioRad ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad) and proteolysis was confirmed by visualizing fragments with different molecular weights.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RT-LAMP Amplification Detection Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RT-LAMP reactions were divided in half. One half of the RT-LAMP reaction was electrophoresed along with Invitrogen Low DNA Mass Ladder on a 1 × Nancy-520, 2% agarose gel in 1 × TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, 1 mM EDTA) at 90 V for 90–120 minutes. Gels were imaged under UV light using the BIO-RAD ChemiDoc XRS + Imaging System. Lanes containing a laddered banding pattern were qualified as a positive amplification.
In addition, a 1:10 SYBR green I (Life Technologies) dilution was made in TAE buffer, then 2.0 μL of the SYBR dilution was added to the remaining half of the reaction. The subsequent visual change of color (orange to yellow) was then also used to identify positive amplifications. The SYBR green I PCR tubes were also imaged under UV light in the BIO-RAD ChemiDoc XRS + Imaging System as the reaction creates a fluorescent output.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Protein Immunoblotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One milliliter of logarithmically growing yeast cells was harvested for protein extraction. Cells were immediately pelleted and resuspended into 250 μl of 0.1 N NaOH for 5 min. The NaOH was then removed by centrifugation so that the cell pellet could be resuspended in 1× Laemmli Sample Buffer. This resuspension was boiled for 5 min. Total protein concentration was determined using an RC/DC assay (BioRad 5000121). Equal amounts of protein were electrophoresed on 8% or 10% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto Immobilon-PVDF Transfer membranes. (Millipore IPVH00010). Immunoblot analysis was performed using standard procedures. All blots were scanned with a BioRad ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ 1.51 v software.
Sen1 immunoblots were performed with slight differences from the standard protocol above as described previously (44 (link)). First, samples were electrophoresed using 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad 4561086) at 140 V for 1 h transferred onto Immobilon-PVDF Membrane. Blots were blocked with 5% dried milk in TBST buffer with 0.1% Tween-20 at 23°C for 1 h, incubated with Sen1 antibody (1:2000 dilution) for 1 h and then an anti-rabbit secondary at 1:3000. Blots were scanned with a BioRad ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System and band intensities were quantified using ImageJ 1.51 v software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Lethal Factor in Anthrax

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Relative amounts of LF were quantified using previously described methods [33] . Briefly, the exotoxin-containing supernatants used in the cytotoxicity assays were quantified using the DC Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA), normalized to 40 µg in a final volume of 30 µL of 1x Laemmli buffer, and heated at 95°C for 4 minutes. Total protein amounts were measured by staining with MemCode Reversible Protein stain (Thermo Scientific, Rockford IL) and relative amounts quantified by densitometry using the ChemiDoc XRS Imaging system and Image lab v4.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA). The membrane was blocked in a 4% Non-fat milk/TBS +0.05% Tween-20 (TBS-T) solution at 4°C overnight and then incubated for 1 hour with 1∶2500 α-LF (DD-6; BEI, Manassas, VA). After washing with TBS-T, the membranes were incubated for 1 hour with 1∶1000 goat α-mouse IgG Alkaline phosphatase. Bands were developed by incubating with Immuno BCIP/NBT substrate solution (MP Biomedicals, Solon OH) until bands were clearly visible. The amount of LF was then quantified using densitometry via the ChemiDoc XRS Imaging system and Image lab v4.0 (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA).
Relative quantitation was calculated using the following formula:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Rapid SYBR-based RT-LAMP Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1:10 SYBR green I (Life Technologies) dilution was made in TAE buffer, then 2 μL of the SYBR dilution was added to the RT-LAMP reactions. The visual change of color (orange to yellow) can be used to identify positive amplifications. In addition, the SYBR green I PCR tubes were imaged under UV light in the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System as the reaction creates a fluorescent output. One half of the RT-LAMP reaction was electrophoresed along with Invitrogen Low DNA Mass Ladder on a 2% agarose gel in 1x TAE buffer (40 mM Tris, 20 mM acetic acid, 1 mM EDTA) at 90 V for 90 minutes. Gels were imaged under UV light using the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System. Lanes containing a laddered banding pattern were qualified as a positive amplification. Clinical samples were considered positive for RT-LAMP products if they had both a fluorescent signal by excitation of UV light and if they had a laddering pattern when run on a gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Expression Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreatic cancer P198 shGTK‐KD and shControl cells were lysed to extract proteins for protein concentration. These proteins were used for western blotting as described in the Supporting Information. The protein expression image was subsequently developed using a ChemiDoc XRS+ Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of bFGF-RBC/NP Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The membrane proteins were characterized by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Western blot was used to analyze CD47 in the RBC lysate, RBCs, and bFGF-RBC/NP. The results were observed using a ChemiDoc-XRS imaging system.
The size, polydispersity index (PDI), and zeta potential of bFGF-NP and bFGF-RBC/NP were measured using a dynamic light scattering detector (Litesizer, Anton Paar, Austria). Thereafter, bFGF-RBC/NP was incubated in PBS and subsequently PBS with 10, 20, and 40% FBS. The diameter and PDI changes were monitored for 7 days to analyze the stability under physiological conditions. Subsequently, the morphology was observed under a transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-100CX, Japan). The encapsulation efficiency of bFGF-RBC/NP containing various concentrations of bFGF was determined.
In vitro release of bFGF was evaluated using the dynamic dialysis method. bFGF, bFGF-NP, and bFGF-RBC/NP were placed into dialysis tubes (100 kDa) and immersed in PBS at 37°C for 72 h under horizontal shaking at 100 rpm. PBS was collected and replaced with an equal volume of fresh PBS periodically. bFGF in PBS was detected using the ELISA kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Myocardial Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein isolated from the myocardium was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membranes were then blocked with 5% fat-free milk and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies including Cav-1 (1 : 1000), VEGF (1 : 1000), VEGFR2 (1 : 1000), GADPH (1 : 10000), ERK1/2 (1 : 1000), and p-ERK1/2 (1 : 2000). After washing with TBST for three times, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (1 : 10000) for 2 h at room temperature. ChemiDoc™ XRS+ Imaging System was used to visualize the signals. Javas freely available NIH ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to quantify the intensity of immune reactivity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 were transiently transfected with miRNA-10b and the miRNA-10b sponge for 24 h using Lipofectamine 2000 liposome, the proliferation ability of the breast cancer cells was analyzed with flat plate cloning experiments (16 (link),17 (link)). The cells were adjusted to 1,000/ml and seeded on a 6-well culture plate and the culturing was continued for 10 days until the clones could be observed using the naked eye (>60 cells/clone). The cells were then fixed with methanol for 20 min washed with PBS twice. Finally the results were recorded with ChemiDoc XRS imaging system. Each group had three repeat wells and this experiment was repeated three times. Clone formation rate = (clones number/inoculated cell number) × 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!