The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

268 protocols using truseq dna sample prep kit

1

DNA Fragmentation and Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA (2 µg) was fragmented by nebulization. Libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer's instruction ‘Preparing Samples for Paired-End Sequencing, Part # 1005063 Rev. A June 2008’ of TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina Japan). DNA fragments were size selected (500 bp) following the Low-Throughput Protocol of TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina Japan). The quality of the library (fragment length distribution) was checked by Agilent Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Assay (Agilent Technologies, Japan) and KAPA Library Quantification Kit (KK4835, Kapa Biosystems, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA-Seq Library Preparation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from each sample with an RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen), in which the first reagent of the kit (Buffer RLC) was added to the frozen tissue, and ground using a mortar and pestle. For each stage/tissue, 50 μg of total RNA were sent to the Joint Genome Institute (JGI). At JGI, mRNA was purified from total RNA using Absolutely mRNA™ purification kit (Stratagene) and chemically fragmented to 200-250bp (Ambion). mRNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II using random hexamers. Second strand cDNA was synthesized using dNTP/dUTP mix (Thermo Scientific), E. coli DNA Ligase, E. coli DNA polymerase I, and E coli RnaseH (Invitrogen). The fragments were treated with end-repair, A- tailing, and ligation of adaptors using the Illumina Truseq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina). Second strand cDNA was removed by AmpErase UNG (Applied Biosystems) to generate strandedness similar to the method described by Parkhomchuk et al. [29 (link)] and enriched with 10 cycles of PCR to generate the final library. qPCR was used to determine the concentration of the libraries. Libraries were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq, producing paired end reads R1 and R2 from each sample (fastq) with 100 bp in each read.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome Sequencing of Turfgrass Cultivar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental material was an elite E. ophiuroides cultivar “Ganbei”, which was originally collected from Lushan, Jiangxi province, and now is deposited in the nursery of the National Main Warm-season Turfgrass Gene Bank (NMWTGB) at the Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing Botanical Garden, Men. Sun Yat-sen, China, with an accession No. E039 in NMWTGB. Total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh young leaves of E039 using the EZgeneTM SuperFast Plant Leaves DNA Kit (Biomiga, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality and integrity of the DNA were checked and determined using spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. The high-quality DNA was then divided into 300~500 bp fragments using an ultrasonicator (Covaris M220, Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). Average 350 bp paired-end (PE) libraries were prepared using Illumina TruSeq DNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and were then sequenced on Illumina’s NovaSeq 6000 platform.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole Genome Sequencing of Plant DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seeds of PP was germinated, and 15-day-old seedlings were used for genomic DNA extraction using Qiagen DNeasy kit (Qiagen). Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher) was used to quantify and NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher) for quality check of the isolated DNA. The DNA was fragmented to 300 bp size using a Covaris M220 focused ultrasonicator. The fragmented DNA was purified, and sequencing libraries were prepared using Illumina TruSeq DNA sample prep kit (Illumina Inc., United States) as per manufacturer’s specifications. The quantity and size distribution of the libraries were carried out using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies). The quantified libraries were subjected for whole genome sequencing on Illumina HiSeq-2000 platform (Illumina Technologies) by paired-end sequencing to generate 90-base pair long, small reads with an insert size of 200–350 bp (Supplementary Figure S2). Standard Illumina pipeline was used to filter the whole genome sequencing data. To remove low-quality reads and reads containing adaptor/primer contamination, FASTQ files were further subjected to stringent quality control using NGS QC Toolkit (v2.3) (Patel and Jain, 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA-Seq Analysis of Soybean and Arabidopsis Seeds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from soybean whole seeds, seed parts, and sdlg using the Concert Plant RNA Reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Ambion). Poly-A+ RNA was selected using oligo-dT25 magnetic beads (Dynabeads). Poly-A+ RNA was prepared for RNA-Seq library construction using the Illumina mRNA-Seq Sample Prep Kit (Illumina). For Arabidopsis pmg seeds, total RNA was used to generate double-stranded cDNA using the Ovation RNA-Seq System V2 (Nugen), and RNA-seq libraries were constructed using the Illumina TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina). Bowtie (46 (link)) was used to map sequenced reads to: (i) the soybean genome (version Wm82.a1) and cDNA models (version Wm82.a1.v1.1) (https://www.soybase.org) (43 (link)) or (ii) the Arabidopsis genome (version TAIR10) and cDNA models (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp) (44 (link)). The EdgeR package (v3.18.1) (47 (link)) was used to identify differentially expressed RNAs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stool Sampling and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The stool samples from a cross-sectional study were collected in sterile plastic cups as soon as they went to the outpatient clinic. The second sample was collected at home and stored at −20°C. All samples were shipped in dry ice to our laboratory and stored at −80°C until DNA extraction.
DNA was extracted by bead beating on a FastPrep instrument (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, California) followed by genomic DNA extraction with a FastDNA kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The purity and concentration of the metagenomic DNA was measured using a NanoDrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer, and integrity and size were assessed using 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis on gels containing 0.5 mg/mL ethidium bromide. The V1-V3 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure and the barcode primer set 338F ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG and 806R GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT. The DNA products were purified by gel extraction and quantified using QuantiFluor-ST (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar concentrations and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform with a TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genomic DNA Library Construction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five libraries including the single species genomic DNA were constructed, namely the individual species library. Approximately 1 Gbp raw data were generated for the individual species library. In addition, seven libraries included multiple species, namely the multiplex sample library. Besides the sequenced leaf beetle species, other 20 distantly related species with equimolar amounts of DNA were pooled into a library, respectively. Approximately 20 Gbp raw data were generated for each of the library including multiple species. For both kinds of libraries, genomic DNA was sonicated to 300 bp using Covaris S220 focused-ultrasonicator (Covaris Inc.), according to Illumina’s protocol. Genomic libraries were constructed using an Illumina TruSeq TM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Genome sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd, China), using 150 bp paired-end run.
The raw reads were demultiplexed and concatenated. The low-quality reads, low-quality ends, and adapter sequences were trimmed using NGS QC Toolkit [45 (link)]. The clean reads were used in the genome assembly. We used IDBA-tran [46 (link)] to conduct the de novo assembly. The parameters are set to the minimum size of contig of 200, an initial k-mer size of 41, an iteration size of 10, and a maximum k-mer size of 91.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pooled Insect Genome Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA for each sample was pooled into twelve different libraries, respectively. Approximately equimolar amounts of genomic DNA for other insect species (ca. 20 different species) were mixed into the library. Each pool was designed to include distant taxonomic species in order to reduce the risk of a “contamination” and/or reads assignment errors in the following steps. For library preparation, Illumina TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was employed, with an average insert size of 350 bp. The indexed libraries were directly sequenced on a HiSeq X Ten platform (Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd, China), with 150 bp pair-ended reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Extraction and Sequencing of Gut Microbiome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the intestinal bacteria using a bacterial DNA isolation kit (Foregene, Chengdu, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was checked on 1% agarose gel, and DNA concentration and purity were determined with NanoDrop 2000 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). After the extraction, DNA fragments from the samples were amplified using specific primers: 338F: 5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′, 806R: 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′ [61 (link)]. The PCR product was detected using 2% agarose gel, purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and quantified using Quantus™ Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). V3–V4 amplicon library was constructed using TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). High-throughput sequencing was performed in a paired-end model using the Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Whole Exome Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole exome sequencing was performed at the Hereditary Research Laboratory, Bethlehem University, using Illumina’s NextSeqTM 500 Sequencing System. DNA libraries were prepared using two preparation kits: the Illumina® TruSeqTM DNA Sample Prep Kit, or NexteraTM Flex for Enrichment Prep Kit. Following sequencing, reads were aligned to the reference human genome (hg19) using the Burrows-Wheeler (BWA) aligner. Prior to variant calling by the Genome Analysis Toolkit3, mapped reads (BAM format) were re-processed by removing PCR duplicates, realigning around indels, and recalibrating base quality. The final list of variants was annotated by ANNOVAR4 (Wang et al., 2010 (link)) using several databases of minor allele frequency including gnomAD5 and PopFreqMax, as well as variant effect predictors such as SIFT (Sorting Intolerant from Tolerant6), PolyPhen-27 and REVEL (Ioannidis et al., 2016 (link)). Candidate variants were validated by Sanger sequencing and then tested for co-segregation with the phenotype in additional family members.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!