The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss ver 14

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 14.0 is a software application designed for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data manipulation, analysis, and presentation. The software enables users to perform a variety of statistical procedures, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

93 protocols using spss ver 14

1

Multimodal Data Analysis of Patient Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2010 and SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). SF-12 questionnaire data were analyzed using the Health Outcomes Scoring software 4.0. Values for continuous variables we reported as the mean and standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used because of non-normally distributed data. For comparing patient groups, we used the chi-square test with a p-value <0.05 being considered statistically significant. Radiological data were analyzed with picture archiving and communication system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Clinical and Cost Comparison Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Clinical factors in the two groups were compared using Fisher exact test. Because cost data showed a skewed distribution, median costs in the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparing Visual Evoked Potentials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amplitude and latency were evaluated and compared among the three groups. The correlation between the P100 and N135 amplitudes was also analyzed. The amplitude scale used was logarithmic. Values for these parameters were compared among the patients and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.
Data were analyzed using SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The distribution of age, sex ratio and causes of severe visual loss among the four groups were evaluated using chi-square tests. Differences in the means of the parameters among the four groups were evaluated using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and were considered to be statistically significant when the p-value was <0.05. Post-hoc analysis was done by Tukey's method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson chi-square test and a linear regression model were used to describe the relationship between the variables. Statistical significance was considered at p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Statistical Analysis in Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation unless otherwise specified in the text. Differences were analyzed using the SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Medcalc ver. 14.8.1 (Medcalc, Ostend, Belgium). Correlations between continuous variables were analyzed using the Pearson correlation test and linear regression. The ratio of males and females according to age group was compared using the chi-square test. The paired t-test was used to compare pairs of dependent groups, and Student's t-test for two independent groups. Two-sided p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Polymorphism and Mortality Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation with or without the median value and range. Categorical variables are shown as frequencies (number of cases and percentages). Differences between groups were detected using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk of mortality according to gene polymorphism. Results of the logistic regression analyses are reported as relative risks or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 14.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was considered when P-value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Airway Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the differences of Penh, cellular pattern in BAL fluid, and GST activity between OVA-model and sham model. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). A p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating Probiotic Effects on Gut Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data in the tables are the average value of three replicates in the form of means ± SE (standard error). The significant differences (P < 0.05) were tested by SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the differences among the treatments were tested by Duncan’s multiple range test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Student t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare continuous variables between the 2 groups for each parametric and nonparametric variable. Categorical data were expressed as percentages and were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. We considered a P-value of 0.05 or less to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Lifestyle Factors Influence Bowel Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study was designed to assess the association between lifestyle factors and bowel preparation. The characteristics of subjects with optimal and suboptimal bowel preparation were compared using Student t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Daily nutrition and food intake were categorized by quartiles. Regression models were used to assess associations of daily nutrition with food intake and bowel preparation quality. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression, both in the crude model and in the multivariate model. The multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Tests for trends were derived from logistic regression with a single term representing the medians of each quartile. A 2-sided P-value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS ver. 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!