The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

73 protocols using hindiii hf

1

EHEC Virulence Factors Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EHEC (EDL933) genomic DNA was isolated via a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit according to the manufacturer’s directions. Sequences encoding LomW (GI:12514345), EscC (GI:12518466), LpfA1 (GI:12518278), and LpfA2 (GI:12518581) were amplified via Phusion polymerase (New England BioLabs) and cloned into a pET30a(+) expression vector using NdeI and XhoI or HindIII-HF (New England BioLabs) restriction sites. The open reading frame encoding each protein was inserted in-frame with a 6×-histidine (His) tag on the C terminus. Ligation, transformation, and expression were performed according to the manufacturer’s directions (pET System; Novagen), with some modifications. Upon confirmation of successful gene insertion via gel electrophoresis and directional sequencing (UTMB Genomics Core), plasmids were transformed into BL21(DE3) competent E. coli (New England BioLabs) via heat shock treatment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Modifications and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals used for DNA modifications, sulfosuccinimidyl 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino(polyethylene glycol)−2000] (Sulfo-PEG2000-DSEP) was from Nanocs Lipid. Sulfosuccinimidyl 6-(4,4′-azipentanamido)hexanoate (Sulfo-LC-SDA), 0.4% trypan blue, propidium iodide (PI), calcine-AM, cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, DMEM, Gibco 21063), and a live/dead bacterial viability kit were purchased form Thermo Scientific. Klenow DNA polymerase and DNA modification enzymes were from New England Biolabs (NEB), including S1 nuclease, high-fidelity restriction endonucleases (EcoRI-HF, HindIII-HF, and PstI-HF), micrococcal nuclease, and corresponding buffers. Other chemicals and reagents were all analytical grade without further purification. The DNA oligonucleotides used in this work were listed in Supplementary Table 2. Unmodified DNA oligonucleotides were basically synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Droplet Digital PCR for Copy Number

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copy numbers of w and Adh were determined using droplet-digital PCR using a QX200 instrument (Bio-Rad, Inc.). Genomic DNA from single adult male flies was extracted using using the Monarch Genomic DNA Purification Kit (New England Biolabs), using a protocol we developed (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l694qklqe/v1, Loehlin (2022) (link)). Testing suggested this procedure was more reliable for copy number determination than single-fly “squish” extractions (Gloor and Engels 1992 ), which are simpler to perform but often showed irregular copy-number calls.
For digital PCR, 2 µL of genomic DNA prep was fragmented by restriction digest in 20 µL reactions with EcoRV-HF and HinDIII-HF (New England Biolabs) for 2h. 4 µL of digest product was assayed in 20 µL PCR reactions using Bio-Rad ddPCR Supermix for Probes (no dUTP) using the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. Assays were duplex, comparing copy number of control gene RpL32 to w or Adh. Primers and probes are listed in File S1. ddPCR results were inspected in Bio-Rad QuantaSoft Analysis Pro. Droplets were manually segmented, applying the same threshold to all samples simultaneously. Data were plotted using R package ggplot2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genomic DNA Extraction and Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were collected from young leaves, freeze-dried, and pulverized using GenoGrinder 2000 (Spex CertiPrep Inc. Metuchen, NJ, USA) at 650 strokes/min for 15 s. Genomic DNA was isolated using 96-well silica filter plates (Epoch Life Science #2020-001). DNA was quantified using PicoGreen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) on a Synergy™ HT plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) and diluted to 50 ng/µl in EB buffer. Genomic libraries were constructed using the two-enzyme GBS approach12 (link) using simultaneous restriction-ligation with HindIII-HF, MseI, and T4 DNA Ligase (New England Biolabs). Restriction-ligation reactions were pooled by 96-well plate, purified using AMPure XP beads, PCR-amplified using Phusion Master Mix (NEB #M0531), and purified again using AMPure XP beads. A DNA7500 chip in an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer was used to determine average library size and concentration, and to dilute each library to 10 nM before submission for sequencing on an Illumina Hiseq 2500 (SR100) at the UC Davis Genome Center (Davis, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Glomerular APOL1 gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from glomeruli using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized from 100 ng of RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (4368814, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Multiplexed qPCR was performed on a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System with TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (4370048) and gene expression assays (APOL1: Hs01066280_m1; IRF1: Mm01288580_m1; GAPDH: Mm99999915_g1; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Relative quantification was performed using the delta-delta Ct method. Allelic discrimination assay was performed as previously described, but with cDNA instead of gDNA (Ruchi et al., 2015 (link)). Briefly, PCR was performed on 10 ng cDNA using APOL1-specific primers (F- 5′-GCCAATCTCAGCTGAAAGCG–3′; R: 5′-TGCCAGGCATATCTCTCCTGG-3′). Purified PCR product (Cat. no. 28106, Qiagen) was digested using HindIII-HF or NspI (R3104 and R0603, New England Biolabs) and run on a 2% agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Engineered SARS-CoV-2 Spike Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pCAGGS.SARS-CoV-2_SΔ19_fpl_mNG2(11)_opt was generated using NEBuilder DNA assembly (New England Biolabs) of a pCAGGS vector backbone cleaved using EcoRV-HF and HindIII-HF (New England Biolabs) and a PCR fragment encoding a codon-optimized SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 spike protein (amplified from pCMV3-C-Myc; VG40589-CM, SinoBiological) with a C-terminal 19 amino acid deletion as described in (Ou et al., 2020 (link)). A 12 amino acid flexible protein linker (fpl) and a modified 11th betasheet of mNeonGreen (Feng et al., 2017 (link)) were added at the C-terminus. pCAGGS.BSD_fpl_mNG2(11) was generated using NEBuilder DNA assembly of a pCAGGS vector backbone cleaved using EcoRV-HF and HindIII-HF and the Blasticidin S deaminase gene (BSD) PCR amplified from a pLenti6.3 vector. Afterwards, cDNA encoding for a 12-amino acid fpl and a modified 11th betasheet of mNeonGreen were inserted at the 3´end of the insert ORF. pcDNA3.1.mNG2(1–10) was generated through NEBuilder DNA assembly of a pcDNA3.1 vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific), amplified by PCR, and 10 betasheets of a modified mNeonGreen synthesized by Genscript. For pCAG3.1/SARS2-Sd19 PCR-amplified Wuhan-Hu-1 spike sequence (from pCMV3-C-Myc) was inserted via blunt end cloning in the pCAG3.1 acceptor vector cut with EcoRV-HF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oligonucleotide Synthesis and Enzyme Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (www.idtdna.com), Midland (www.oligos.com) or Eurofins (www.operon.com) and purified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. hOGG1 and human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) were prepared as described (18–20 (link)). T4 polynucleotide kinase, terminal transferase, T4 DNA ligase, NtBbvCI, BamHI-HF and HindIII-HF were purchased from New England Biolabs. [γ-32P] ATP and 3′-deoxyadenosine 5′-[α-32P] triphosphate were purchased from Perkin Elmer. 5-Iodoacetamidofluorescein (5-IAF) was ordered from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genotyping-by-Sequencing for SNP Discovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping‐by‐sequencing libraries were prepared by restricting genomic DNA with HindIII‐HF (NEB) with Ampure XP bead (Beckman‐Coulter) cleanup. Sequence data were obtained on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 instrument at the UC Davis Genome Center. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) calling was performed using the TASSEL GBS pipeline (Glaubitz et al., 2014 (link)) with alignment to the Chandler genome (Marrano et al., 2020 (link)), resulting in 13,320 polymorphic SNPs. The phangorn package in R (R Core Team, 2017 ; Schliep et al., 2017 ) was used to construct a neighbour‐joining tree from the distance matrix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Plasmid Backbone Excision Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To cut out the transgene from the plasmid backbone, a restriction digest reaction was set up as a 50 μL reaction in a PCR tube as follows:
ReagentVolume/concentration
Restriction enzyme (HindIII-HF, NotI-HF, New England Biolabs)1 μL of each
10X CutSmart® buffer (New England Biolabs)5 μL
Plasmid DNA1 μg
dH2ORemaining volume (up to 50 μL)
The reaction was run for four hours at 37 °C on a thermocycler
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying DNA End Resection at DSBs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
End resection was assayed in ER-AsiSI cells that were predominantly in S/G2 phase by cell synchronization procedure mentioned earlier in the Methods section. The extent of resection adjacent to specific DSBs was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as described previously [24 (link)]. The sequences of qPCR primers are shown in S1 Table. 20μL of genomic DNA sample (~200 ng in 1x CutSmart NEB restriction enzyme buffer) was digested or mock digested with 20 units of restriction enzymes (NmeAIII, AvaI, BsrGI, BamHI-HF or HindIII-HF; New England Biolabs) at 37°C overnight. 5 μl of digested or mock digested samples (~20 ng) were used as templates in 20 μl of qPCR reaction containing 10 μl of 2x iTaqUniversal SYBR Green Supermix, 500 nM of each primer using iCycler iQReal-Time PCR (Bio-Rad). The % ssDNA generated by resection at selected sites was determined as previously described [24 (link)]. Briefly, for each sample, a ΔCt was calculated by subtracting the Ct value of the mock-digested sample from the Ct value of the digested sample. The % ssDNA was calculated using algorithm: ssDNA% = 1/(2^(ΔCt-1) + 0.5)*100 [24 (link)]. Data represent the mean of at least three independent experiments with SD values indicated by error bars.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!