The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 fluoroorotic acid

Manufactured by US Biological

5-fluoroorotic acid is a chemical compound used in biological research and laboratory applications. It serves as a precursor or intermediate in various biochemical and molecular biology experiments. The core function of 5-fluoroorotic acid is to facilitate specific research processes, but a detailed description of its intended use is not provided to maintain an unbiased and factual approach.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using 5 fluoroorotic acid

1

Yeast Growth Media Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
YEPD rich medium [1% yeast extract (BD Bacto), 2% peptone (BD Bacto), 2% dextrose (J. T. Baker)] was used unless other specific medium is mentioned. For selection, YEPD was supplemented with 300 mg/L Hygromycin B (InvivoGen), 400 mg/L G418—Geneticin (Santa Cruz) or both. For selecting ΔURA3 strains, Synthetic Complete (SC) medium was prepared with 5-FOA [2% dextrose, 0.17% yeast nitrogen base (Difco), 0.14% amino acid dropout, 0.5% ammonium sulfate (Sigma), 0.08% 5-Fluoroorotic acid (US Biological) and the required amino acids]. SC medium lacking uracil was used for selecting cells with intact URA3. Solid media were prepared by addition of 2% agar (Difco) to any of the liquid media listed above. The strains used in this study are diallel strains (Shapira et al., 2014 (link)) and manipulated strains as described in the text that were made in two genetic backgrounds: S288c (Winzeler et al., 1998 (link)) and SK1(Kane and Roth, 1974 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Functional Validation of Rab Mutants via Plasmid Shuffling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid shuffling assays were performed to test whether Rab HVD mutants and chimeras are functional in vivo. ypt1Δ or ypt31Δypt32Δ null mutants were maintained by a copy of YPT1 or YPT31 on a centromeric URA3 plasmid. Shuffling strains were transformed with centromeric LEU2 plasmids containing Rab genes under their endogenous promoters. Transformed yeast were plated on -Leu synthetic dropout media to allow for cells with functional constructs to lose the URA3 maintenance plasmid. After 2–3 days of growth transformed cells were resuspended in yeast nitrogen base, diluted to an OD600 of 0.5, then serially diluted onto -Leu and synthetic complete media with 3.9 mM 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA; US Biological). Cells were grown at 30°C unless otherwise noted for 2–3 days prior to imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rates of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) were determined using a standard protocol (Putnam and Kolodner, 2010) (link). Briefly, pre-cultures of S. cerevisiae cells harboring a CAN1::URA3 reporter on chromosome 5 were grown in SC-Ura medium and plated out on YPD plates to obtain colonies that formed from single cells. Eight colonies were excised from the plates for each condition and used to inoculate larger cultures in YPD (control strains: 50 ml; strains with stabilized interaction: 2 ml), which were grown to stationary phase at 30 °C. The number of viable cells was determined by plating a serial dilution (10 -6 ) on nonselective YPD plates. The total number of GCR events was determined by plating the remaining culture on SC-Arg plates that were supplemented with 50 mg/L L-canavanine (Sigma C9758) and 1 g/L 5'-fluoroorotic acid (US Biological Life Sciences F5050) to select against both CAN1 and URA3. No more than 10 9 cells were spread on each selection plate and the plates were incubated at 30 °C for two days (YPD) and three to five days (selection).
Afterwards, the clones were counted and GCR rates as well as confidence intervals were calculated by fluctuation analysis using the maximum likelihood method in the web tool FALCOR (B. M. Hall et al., 2009) (link) that was kindly made accessible by the Liang lab under https://lianglab.brocku.ca/FALCOR/.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gross-chromosomal rearrangement (GCR) rates were determined by fluctuation analysis as previously described [31 (link)–33 (link)]. Briefly, fifteen cultures from three independent isolates were grown from single colonies in 10 ml YPD to saturation (2 days) at 30°C. Dilutions of cells were plated on YPD agar plates to determine the viable cell count. The remaining culture was plated on synthetic media lacking arginine and uracil and supplemented with canavanine (60 mg/l, Sigma) and 5-fluoro-orotic acid (1 g/l, US Biological). Clones with GCRs were identified by their resistance to canavanine and 5-fluoro-orotic acid (Canr 5-FOAr), which is indicative of simultaneous inactivation of the CAN1 and URA3 genes on chromosome V. The rate of accumulating GCRs was determined as previously described and is reported as the median rate with 95% confidence intervals [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rates of gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) were determined using a standard protocol85 (link). Briefly, pre-cultures of S. cerevisiae cells harboring a CAN1::URA3 reporter on chromosome 5 were grown in SC-Ura medium and plated out on YPD plates to obtain colonies that formed from single cells. Eight colonies were excised from the plates for each condition and used to inoculate larger cultures in YPD (control strains: 50 ml; strains with stabilized interaction: 2 ml), which were grown to stationary phase at 30 °C. The number of viable cells was determined by plating a serial dilution (10−6) on non-selective YPD plates. The total number of GCR events was determined by plating the remaining culture on SC-Arg plates that were supplemented with 50 mg/L L-canavanine (Sigma C9758) and 1 g/L 5′-fluoroorotic acid (US Biological Life Sciences F5050) to select against both CAN1 and URA3. No more than 109 cells were spread on each selection plate and the plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2 days (YPD) and 3–5 days (selection). Afterwards, the clones were counted and GCR rates as well as 95% confidence intervals were calculated by fluctuation analysis using the maximum likelihood method in the web tool FALCOR109 (link) that was kindly made accessible by the Liang lab under https://lianglab.brocku.ca/FALCOR/ (no version data available, as used in September 2020).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yeast Strains and Genetic Manipulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The yeast strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplemental Material, Table S1 and Table S2. Yeast was grown and manipulated according to standard procedures (Sherman 1991 (link)). Yeast was grown on full medium (YPD) and selective minimal plates (YM), and plates containing 5-fluoro-orotic acid (US Biological) were used to select against URA3. Chromosomal integration of sir4 alleles was obtained by transferring them onto a yeast integrating plasmid (pRS306, URA3-marked), and introducing them into yeast strains by integrative transformation followed by loop-out on 5-FOA medium. Semiquantitative mating assays were performed by generating serial dilutions (1:10, start OD600 of one) of the respective strain in a microtiter dish. For the growth control, cells were transferred to agar plates using a replica tool. An equal volume of the mating tester strain (suspension of 10 OD600 per milliliter) was then added to the strain in the microtiter well, and a replica of this mixture was transferred to a plate selective for the growth of diploids. Plates were incubated for 2–3 d at 30°.
pGBD-C2-sir4 plasmids were generated by excising a ClaI/BlpI fragment of sir4 alleles from pAE2289 or pAE2029, and inserting it into ClaI/BlpI-cleaved pAE1355. pGAD-C2 and pGBD-C2 plasmids encoding the coiled-coil domain of Sir4 were generated by inserting Sir4 fragments using ClaI and BglII.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Measurement of Genome Instability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A minimum of three independent spore clones were isolated from each mutant progeny pool arising from the SGA protocol and then grown as patches on a YPD-agar plate at 30 °C for two days and replica-plated onto CSM -Arg media containing 60 mg l−1 canavanine (Sigma) and 1 g l−1 5-fluoroorotic acid (US Biological). The number of papillae growing on the GCR medium was scored using a semi-quantitative scoring system as follows: 0, no papillae; 1, 1–5 papillae (this was on average the number of papillae observed with the leu2Δ control strain for the dGCR assay); 2, 6–15 papillae; 3, 16—a countable number of papillae (∼150–200); 4, papillae that were too many or too close together to count; 5, a lawn of papillae covering the entire patch (Fig. 1d). Then the scores for all independent patches analysed for each mutant were averaged to generate a GCR strain score (Supplementary Data 1). Negative scores were assigned to strains that did not grow so that these strains could be ignored during the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!