The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using dnase removal reagent

1

Quantitative Analysis of B. anthracis Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown at 30 °C in LB medium overnight and subcultured at a 1:100 ratio into fresh LB medium. After 6 h of growth at 37 °C in the presence or absence of TCS activator as specified, aliquots of 1 ml of cell culture were harvested by centrifugation. Total RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, MD), and treated with Turbo-DNA-free DNase (Ambion). The DNase was removed using DNase removal reagents (Ambion). RNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Total RNA (200 ng) from each sample was subjected to cDNA synthesis using high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was then conducted using iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX96 qPCR cycler (Bio-Rad). The B. anthracis housekeeping gene 16 S rRNA was used as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Northern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using a RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, MD), and treated with Turbo-DNA-free DNase (Ambion). The DNase was removed using DNase removal reagents (Ambion). RNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. RNA (15 μg) was mixed with loading buffer (formamide, bromophenol blue, xylene cyanol, EDTA), denatured at 90 °C for 2 min, loaded on a 1% bleach agarose gel, and run at 100 W for ~2 h. RNA was transferred onto nylon membrane in 20× SSC buffer at room temperature overnight followed by cross-linking two times at 254 nm. The membrane was incubated in DIG easy hybridization buffer at 42 °C for 1 h. Four antisense-oligo probes against hitPRS (Supplementary Table 2) were pooled together and labeled at 5’-ends with [γ-32P]-ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. After labeling, G10 columns (NucAway spin columns, Invitrogen) were used to remove the unincorporated (γ-32P) ATP. The labeled probes were added to the hybridization buffer and incubated at 42 °C overnight. One labeled probe against 16 S rRNA (Supplementary Table 2) served as a loading control. The membrane was washed 3× in wash buffer (0.5× SSC, 0.1%SDS) followed by exposure to a phosphorimager screen overnight, and the radioactive signals were detected using a phosphor image analyzer (Typhoon FLA 7000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptional Analysis of B. anthracis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown at 30°C in LB medium overnight and subcultured at a 1:100 ratio into fresh LB medium. After 6 h of growth at 37°C in the presence or absence of 20 μM ‘205, aliquots of 4 ml of cell culture were harvested by centrifugation. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, MD), and treated with Turbo-DNA free DNase (Ambion). The DNase was removed using DNase removal reagents (Ambion). RNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Two hundred nanograms of total RNA from each sample was subjected to cDNA synthesis using high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was then conducted using iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX96 qPCR cycler (Bio-Rad). The B. anthracis housekeeping gene 16S rRNA was used as an internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptional Profiling in Bacillus anthracis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown at 30 °C in LB medium overnight and subcultured at a 1:100 ratio into fresh LB medium. After 5 h of growth at 37 °C, aliquots of 4 ml of cell culture were mixed with 4 ml of ice-cold acetone/EtOH (1:1 ratio) and harvested by centrifugation. These served as T0 samples. Rifampicin was added to the remaining cell cultures to a final concentration of 150 μg ml−1. Aliquots of 4 ml of cell culture were harvested as described above at time intervals following rifampicin treatment. Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen Sciences, Germantown, MD) and treated with Turbo-DNA-free DNase (Ambion). The DNase was removed using DNase removal reagents (Ambion). RNA samples were quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. Total RNA (200 ng) from each sample was subjected to cDNA synthesis using high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was then conducted using iQ SYBR green supermix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX96 qPCR cycler (Bio-Rad). The B. anthracis housekeeping genes 16 s rRNA and gyrA were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Progenitor Cell Expansion in Salisphere Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression of progenitor cell-type and signaling-pathway markers were measured by qPCR at day zero (D0), three days (D3) and ten days (D10) to track changes in progenitor cell maintenance and expansion in culture. Other genes relevant for SMG development were screened on D10 salispheres. Primers were designed using Beacon Designer software. DNase-free RNA was isolated from salisphere cell lysates and prepared using an RNAqueous-Micro kit and DNase removal reagent (Ambion, Inc. Austin, TX). cDNA (0.5–1 ng) was generated and analyzed by qPCR as previously published [27 (link)]. Melt curve analysis was used to verify the generation of a single amplicon. Expression levels were normalized by the delta-delta Ct method to both the housekeeping-gene Rsp29 and the experimental control group [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating RNA Quality for RNAseq and qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted to evaluate quality prior to RNAseq using the RNAqueous-4PCR kit and DNase removal reagent (Ambion, Inc. Austin, TX). Only samples with RIN > 7 were submitted for RNAseq analysis. For qPCR analysis, cDNA (20 ng) was generated using SuperScript™ III First-Strand Synthesis System (ThermoFisher Scientific). qPCR was performed with iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, 1708882) in a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, 1855195). Melt curve analysis was used to verify the generation of a single amplicon. Expression levels were normalized by the delta-delta Ct method to the housekeeping gene Rsp29. Human samples were normalized to GAPDH. At least four biological replicates for each group were processed except when otherwise specified. A list of the primers used in this study are provided in detail in Supplementary Table 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!