The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Optojump

Manufactured by Microgate
Sourced in Italy

Optojump is a laboratory equipment product used for measuring various physical parameters. It utilizes optical sensors to capture data related to human movement and performance. The core function of Optojump is to provide accurate and reliable measurements without interpretation or extrapolation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

144 protocols using optojump

1

Optojump System for Measuring Jump Height

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Optojump system (Optojump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) consists of 2 bars (transmitting and receiving bars, 1 m apart) equipped with 33 optical LEDs fitted in the transmitting bar that continuously communicate with the corresponding set in the receiving bar. The LEDs are positioned 0.3 cm from ground level, on the Ergojump mat, and at 3.125 cm intervals. Any break of the beam switched on and off automatically activates a digital chronometer used to calculate FT and JH [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Muscle Fatigue and Recovery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle power and vertical jump performance were measured just before, immediately after, 30 min after and 60 min after the endurance tests, to evaluate muscle fatigue and recovery. Muscle power was measured using a linear encoder (Globus, Codogne, Italy) on the leg extension machine with the same load as during the endurance test (70% of the 1-RM). Subjects were requested to lift the load as fast as possible (3 trials) throughout the 100° range of motion. The linear encoder measured the vertical velocity of the load being lifted and allowed measurements of muscle power during the entire range of motion. Peak power of the best repetition was considered for analyses. Immediately after muscle power assessments, subjects performed two counter movement jumps on an Optojump system (Optojump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy), starting from a standing position, then squatting down to a 90° knee angle and extending the knees in one continuous movement. During these jumps, arms were kept close to the hips to minimize their contribution. The best jump height was retained for analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Countermovement Jump Test Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Regarding the CMJ test, from a standing position, athletes completed a fast downward movement by flexing the knees and hips, followed by rapid extension of both knees and hips. Height jump performance was recorded over three trials using an Optojump (Optojump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy), with 45 s of passive recovery between jumps, and the best performance was kept for further analysis. The test was repeated for test-retest precision assessment. The intraclass correlation coefficient value was 0.933. The typical error of measurement was 1.7 cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating Sprint Measurement Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental devices to measure GCT were the inertial measurement sensor PARTwear (PW; HuCE-microLab, University of Applied Sciences, Biel, Switzerland) and the optical measurement system Optojump (OJ; Optojump Next, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). As gold standard, a high-speed video camera system (HSC; Camera Marathon Ultra CL600, Videal AG, Niederönz, Switzerland) was used. Data assessment took place on a completely even indoor track and participants wore their own running spikes, alike during competition. To ensure measurement system accuracy for a range of speeds, each subject was asked to perform three sets of four runs over a distance of 40 m at individual maximal sprinting, intense, and normal training speed. Speeds were self-selected to allow for natural running technique. For each run, one step was analyzed 30 m from the start. To test the PW's and OJ's validity, GCT were simultaneously registered by all three measurement systems worn by the same subject.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Vertical Jump Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For RSI, participants were instructed to drop from a 0.3 m platform and upon landing, jump maximally, whilst minimising ground contact time and maximising vertical jump height. The RSI values were calculated automatically using manufacturer software (Optojump, Microgate, Italy) through the sum of jump height (cm) divided by contact time (ms). Following a 30-s rest period, participants performed a CMJ with hands on hips, feet shoulder width apart and when prompted, descended into a squat (~60°) and jumped vertically with maxima l effort. Jump efforts were measured using a portable optical measurement system (Optojump, Microgate, Italy) and were separated by a 30-s passive recovery period with the mean of three jump being used for analyses (Field et al., 2020) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Single Leg Vertical Jump Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To calculate the vertical jump capacity, a single leg CMJ was used the Optojump tool (Optojump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). All subjects were instructed to perform a maximum vertical jump with their hands on their hips and to land in a vertical position with their knees bent, controlled and balanced, and held in the landing position for 2–3 s. Three attempts were made and the best jump was selected for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Plyometric Push-up Flight Time Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants started in a press up position, with their hands placed on the floor 70 cm apart.
Participants then rapidly flexed their elbows to approximately 90 degrees before maximally exploding off the floor, clapping their hands together, and landing with their arms fully extended. This was repeated three times within quick succession using an Optojump timing system (Optojump, Microgate, Microgate S.r.l., Bolzano, Italy). Flight time for each push up was recorded, and the total flight time was used for comparison. After completing one submaximal plyometric push up as a warm up, participants performed two maximal RPP efforts, with one minute recovery after the warm up, and in-between each effort. Flight time for each push up was recorded, and the total flight time was used for comparison. The coefficient of variation (CV%) for this measurement with the same group of players was 5.5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Vertical Jump Performance Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vertical jump performance was assessed with a CMJ test. Starting position was stationary, erect, with knees fully extended and hands kept on the waist. Subjects squatted down to a self-selected height before beginning a forceful upward motion. Subjects were also instructed to avoid flexing hips, knees and ankles throughout the flight phase and at touchdown with the aim to limit any effect on jump height calculated according the flight time phase duration. Finally, they were instructed to jump as high as possible, and verbal encouragement was provided during the jumps. Subjects performed three attempts with passive recovery of 45 s between jumps, and the best result was recorded for data analysis. The jump height (cm) was measured with the Optojump apparatus (Optojump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Vertical Jumping Performance Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Athletes started from an upright standing position, completed a fast downward movement by flexing the knees and hips, immediately followed by a rapid extension of both legs. During the extension of the legs a vertical arm-swing of both arms was performed to yield a better performance in the CMJ. The performance was recorded as the height of the jump using an Optojump (Optojump, Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). Three trials were performed, and the best performance was maintained for the analysis. 45 s of passive recovery was allowed between trials. ICC for test–retest trial from the present study was 0.972.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessing Vertical and Horizontal Jump Performance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CMJ was executed as previously described. 14 Jump height was recorded using an optoelectric system (Optojump, Microgate, SRL, Bolzano, Italy). A rest period of 1-min was allowed between trials. The best out of three trials was retained for further analysis.
For the SLJ test, the protocol of Negra et al. 15 was followed. The horizontal distance between the starting line and the heel of the rear foot was recorded using a tape measure to the nearest 1cm. A rest period of 1-min between trials was allowed. The best out of three trials was recorded for further analysis.
For the assessment of reactive strength, participants executed five repeated bilateral maximal vertical hops using an Optojump photoelectric system (Microgate, SRL, Bolzano, Italy) for performance assessment. Before testing, youth athletes were instructed to maximize jump height and to shorten ground contact time. The first jump was not counted and the four remaining jumps were averaged for the calculation of RSI using the following formula: RSI= jump height (mm) / ground contact time (ms). A rest period of 5-min between trials was allowed. The best out of two trials was recorded for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!