The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Li 820

Manufactured by LI COR
Sourced in United States

The LI-820 is a carbon dioxide (CO2) gas analyzer designed for laboratory and industrial applications. It utilizes non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) technology to accurately measure CO2 concentrations. The device provides fast response times and high precision, making it suitable for various research and monitoring purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using li 820

1

Measuring Biodegradation of Bioplastics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carbon dioxide evolution served as a metric of biodegradation of BDMs. A syringe was used to collect 0.5 ml aliquots of air headspace in the culture bottles through butyl septa cap. CO2 concentrations were determined using an infrared gas analyzer (LI-820, Licor Inc., Lincoln, NE, United States). Gas standards (1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 ppm) were used to create standard curves. Sample CO2 ppm values were then derived from standard curves and final values reported as cumulative CO2 (ppm) production over time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Situ Benthic Chamber Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
During the maximum growth period in mid-July 2011, the primary production of the whole community was measured in all treatments (three randomly chosen replicates) by monitoring the change in CO2 mole fraction (ppm) in situ using a benthic chamber [method and devices described in 68] . The benthic chamber is made of a transparent Plexiglas box, with a 30×30 cm base, covered with a dome; the chamber's total volume is 18 L, and it is connected through a closed circuit to a CO2 infrared gas analyser (LI-COR Inc, LI-820, Lincoln, NE, USA). The data were recorded on a data logger (LI-COR LI-1400; LI-COR Inc.) every 15 seconds (mean of 5 sec data interval) during a 10 to 20 minute incubation depending on the community response. Measurements were carried out with ambient daylight (always over 1000 µmol photon/m2) to measure the net primary productivity (NPP) and in the dark (benthic chamber covered with an opaque polyethylene sheet) to measure the respiration (R). The gross primary production (GPP) was calculated by adding NPP to R. This method was not used to evaluate the total budget of the shore community, but it gives an accurate and useful measure of primary production at the community scale in similar conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Soil Microbial Respiration Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With the sieved soil samples, we then measured water content, water holding capacity, and incubated 25 g equivalent dry soil at a normalized moisture level (60% WHC) for 12 h in airproof jars. The CO2 content in the headspace was measured with a LiCor LI820 once at the beginning of the incubation and once at the end. The difference between the two measures corresponded to the amount of CO2 that had been produced by soil microbial respiration (Curiel Yuste et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Whole Animal Respirometry Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Positive pressure flow-through respirometry was used to measure whole animal rates of oxygen consumption ( V˙O2 , ml O2 h−1) and carbon dioxide production ( V˙CO2 , ml CO2 h−1), as a proxy for whole animal metabolism (the sum of both respiratory and cutaneous respiration). Dry, CO2–free air passed through the metabolic chamber (50 ml, 300 ml or 500 ml glass air-tight container), at a controlled flow rate of either 30 ml min−1 (frogs <10 g), 50 ml min−1 (10–25 g) or 80 ml min−1 (>25 g) and re-scrubbed of water vapour before passing through an infrared CO2 gas analyser (LI-820, LI-COR® Biosciences Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) and an O2 analyser (Oxzilla II; Sable Systems, Las Vegas, NE, USA). The fractional concentrations of the CO2 and O2 in the excurrent air (Feco2 and Feo2) were recorded in a PowerLab 4/35 interface and imported into Labchart software (ADinstruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Grass Growth under Elevated CO2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We exposed grasses to five CO2 treatments: ambient concentration (400 ± 10 ppm) or elevated concentrations (600, 800, 1000, and 1200 ± 10 ppm). In order to minimize confounding effects of environmental variation between different chambers, we randomly changed the CO2 concentration of each growth chamber every three days, and then relocated the CO2 treated grasses to the growth chambers with corresponding CO2 concentrations. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replicates (pots) per treatment. The ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations within the chambers were maintained through an automatic CO2 control system connected to a CO2 source-tank containing 100% research-grade CO2 (Airgas, Inc.). The CO2 concentrations inside the chambers were continuously monitored through an infrared gas analyzer (LI-820; LICOR, Inc., Lincoln, NB, USA) connected to a computer logger maintaining the CO2 concentration within 10 ppm of the ambient and elevated target levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Characteristics and Respiration Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Changes in soil pH, macro and micronutrients, percent of soil moisture content, and bulk density, and soil respiration were measured before planting and at harvest in 2012 and 2013 growing seasons. Soil moisture content level in each sample was determined by weight loss after oven dry at 104°C for 24 hr. Bulk density measurements were done drying cores of soil at 104°C for 24 h (Blake and Hartge, 1986 ). Soil pH, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, soil organic matter, nitrate-nitrogen, ammonium-nitrogen, and cation exchange capacity were determined by the MSU Soil and Plant Nutrient Laboratory using standard procedures (Huffman and Barbarick, 1981 ; Nelson, 1983 ). The rate of CO2 emission from the soil samples was used as an indicator of relative soil respiration and of level of biological activity (Ettema et al., 1998 ; Ferris and Matute, 2003 ; Treonis et al., 2010 ). In total, 15 g of fresh soil sample was incubated in 237 ml glass jars at 22°C for 7 days at field soil moisture content during sampling (Treonis et al., 2010 ). The CO2 concentration of a 0.5 ml headspace gas sample was withdrawn from the jar through the rubber stopper using 1 ml syringe. The concentration was determined after 7 days of incubation using an infrared gas analyzer (LI-820, LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA; Zibilske, 1994 ) and expressed as µg CO2-C per gram of soil per day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Effects of Elevated CO2 on Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plants were exposed to two CO2 treatments: ambient concentration (400±10 µmol L−1) or elevated concentration (800±10 µmol L−1). Each CO2 treatment was applied in four different growth chambers, and the plants were moved between the chambers every 3 days to eliminate the potential confounding effects of environmental variations between chambers. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replicates (pots) per treatment.
The ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations within the chambers were maintained through an automatic CO2 controlling system connected to the CO2 source-tank containing 100% research-grade CO2 using a previously-described method.10 The CO2 concentrations inside the chambers were continuously monitored using an infrared gas analyzer (Li-820; LICOR, Inc., Lincoln, NB, USA) connected to a computer data logger. The CO2 concentration was maintained using an automatic controlling system consisting of a programmable logic controller unit, solenoid valves and a laptop computer with software capable of monitoring and maintaining the CO2 concentration within 10 µmol L−1 of the ambient or elevated target levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Carbon Allocation in Atmosphere-Plant-Soil System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to study carbon allocation within the atmosphereplant-soil system, a 13 C-pulse-labeling approach was used. 99 at. % 13 CO 2 (Euriso-top, Saint-Aubin, France) was applied once per week (14:00 local time on Thursdays) by injecting 15, 56 or 98 mL CO 2 into each chamber depending on the chamber extension used, in order to yield a target 13 CO 2 content of 58 at. %. A weekly labeling frequency has been shown to ensure a sufficient abundance of root-derived 13 C in the soil at the end of the experiment (Bromand et al., 2001; (link)Kong and Six, 2010) (link). After chamber closure, CO 2 concentration in one chamber was monitored using a CO 2 analyzer (Li-820, LICOR, Lincoln, US). Throughout the experiment, CO 2 concentrations were measured in the same chamber. After the CO 2 concentration dropped below 200 ppm, another 13 CO 2 pulse was injected to yield a postlabel CO 2 concentration of 570 ppm in the chamber headspace. The chamber lids were kept closed for 2 h after label injection to achieve sufficient uptake and then reopened to avoid condensation. On the same day of pulse labeling, all chambers were closed overnight to recuperate 13 C lost through night respiration and allowed to be taken up by the plants in the morning before reopening the chambers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Continuous Aquatic pCO2 Measurement System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The continuous measurement system is well described in Cotovicz et al. (2015 (link)Cotovicz et al. ( , 2016)) (link). Briefly, a submersible water pump was attached at the side of the boat at a depth of about 0.5 m, providing continuous water flux at 6 L min -1 . One part of this water flux (3 L min -1 ) was directed to an equilibration system to measure the aquatic pCO 2 (marble equilibrator type; Frankignoulle et al., 2001) . The marble exchanger consists of an acrylic tube (100 cm long; 8 cm diameter), filled with glass marbles. The marbles increase the exchange area inside the tube to about 1.4 m 2 , and reduces the internal tube volume to 0.6 L. The marble equilibrator is connected to a non-dispersive infrared gas detection (NDIR, LI-COR® type LI-820). The air in the equilibrator was dried before passing to the gas analyzer. The LICOR® was calibrated before and after each sampling camping with certified material with air pCO 2 values of 410, 1007 and 5035 ppmv (White Martins Certified Material, RJ, Brazil). The fresh soda lime was used to set the zero and the standard at 1007 ppmv to set the span. The accuracy of pCO 2 measurements was about ± 5 ppmv. The temperature, salinity, fluorescence and DO were measured on-line with a calibrated YSI 6600 V2 multiparameter sonde.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Soil Respiration Dynamics under Wetting Regimes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the acclimatization period of 4 weeks, on day 1 of the treatments, soil in the jars was watered up to 45% moisture content if needed, and were left to dry without lids in the incubator. This was 'wetting event 1' and the soils were rewetted either every 19 d (historical) or 48 d (reduced wetting). Soil (heterotrophic) respiration was measured daily or twice daily for the first three days, and less frequently thereafter, for the duration of the experiment (see Fig. 2 for exact timing of sampling events). An initial gas sample was taken from the head space of the jar, with the lid loosely covering the opening, so that air could be drawn into the jar. Before taking the sample, the air in the headspace was mixed by filling and emptying a 5 ml syringe back into the jar. Then, a 2 ml sample was taken and injected into a CO2 gas analyser (LICOR, LI-820, USA). The jar was closed immediately and left for 40 min at room temperature (21±1 °C) before taking the next gas sample through a rubber septum in the lid of the jar, again mixing the air before taking the sample. Measured concentrations of CO2 were converted to amount (mg) of CO2 production per hour per kg of dry soil. The masses of the jars were recorded at each CO2 sampling, in order to calculate gravimetric water content of the soil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!