Qualtrics xm platform

This study used a triangulation mixed methods design to guide analysis of data.²³ Survey data was downloaded from Qualtrics XM Platform and imported into IBM SPSS Statistics 27 (SPSS, Inc.) software for quantitative analysis (alpha set at p < 0.05). Descriptive analyses were used to assess frequency and mean data. Focus group and interview transcriptions were uploaded in NVIVO 12 software (QSR International) for analysis. Thematic analysis was completed to generate themes.²⁴, ²⁵ Researchers J.S. and R.J. independently reviewed one interview and one focus group transcript to generate initial codes and then discussed consistencies and discrepancies between identified codes. Codes were combined and refined at this time. Both coders then independently coded the remaining focus groups and interviews, before reviewing coding, with inter‐coder reliability analysis revealing substantial agreement (k = 0.61). Although there were minimal differences in coding; some codes were reviewed, refined and re‐coded where appropriate. Once all transcripts were coded, key domains and their respective dimensions were thematically analysed.

Data were retrieved from Qualtrics XM Platform and imported in SPSS 26 (IBM SPSS Statistics 26), in which the data were managed and analyzed. Normality of continuous variables was tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test and eyeballing. Non-normally distributed data were described as median and interquartile range (IQR). Binary and ordinal data were described as frequencies and percentages.
Children with feeding and eating problems and disorders, PFD and ARFID were compared with healthy peers using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data, the Fisher exact test for binary data, and the chi-square test for ordinal distributed data. Significance level was set at P = 0.05. Due to multiple testing results were interpreted explorative.