The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using kapa probe fast mastermix

1

Quantifying NF-κB2, RelB, NIK, and Bcl3 Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression levels of the NF-κB2, RelB, NIK and Bcl3 genes were quantified by real-time PCR (qPCR) assays. Specific primers and probes for NF-κB2, RelB, NIK, Bcl3 and IPO8 genes (Importin 8 was used as a reference gene) were designed to bind to all isoforms using OligoAnalyzer 3.1 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.)52 (link), according to the sequences provided in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Primers and probes were synthesized by IDT. Primer sequences and reaction conditions can be provided upon request. The qPCR reactions were carried out in triplicates, in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 5 μl of cDNA in 1× Kapa Probe Fast Master Mix (KAPA BIOSYSTEMS, Woburn, MA, USA) in an MX3000p cycler (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Relative expression levels were calculated using the LinReg Program53 (link) and were normalized to levels obtained for the calibrator sample and to IPO8 levels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All quantitative PCR experiments were conducted on an ABI 7900HT (PerkinElmer Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK). Reactions were performed in a 6 μl volume of 2 x Kapa Probe Fast Mastermix (Kapa Biosystems, Amsterdam, Netherlands). TaqMan assays (FAM labelled) and all reagents were supplied by Applied Biosystems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, US). The reaction conditions were: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 20 s. The Ct of each sample was calculated using the following equation (where E is reaction efficiency determined from a standard curve): ΔCt = E[min Ct-sample Ct] using the 1/40 dilution from a standard curve generated from a pool of all cDNAs as the calibrator. Relative expression ratio was calculated using the equation: ratio = ΔCt[target]/ ΔCt[ref] and expression normalised to β-actin. Statistical analysis was performed on mean relative expression ratio values (Ratio = ΔCt[target]/ΔCt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression levels were evaluated on a CFX 96™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad) using custom-designed primers and probes (500 nM and 200 nM final concentration, respectively) (Generi Biotech) (Supplemental Table 2) and KAPA PROBE Fast Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems). Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the ΔΔCt method and were normalized to the expression level of reference gene SURF1 selected by Normfinder (GenEx software, MultiD Analyses). Samples below the detection limit were assigned a relative expression value of 0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

BMP2 Signaling Pathway Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from abdominal and gluteal AT biopsies [23 (link)] and preadipocytes [21 (link)] and reverse transcribed as previously described. Complementary (c) DNA was synthesised from total RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies, Warrington, UK). Quantitative (q) PCR was performed in triplicate on cDNA diluted 1/20 with Kapa Probe Fast Mastermix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) in an 8 µl reaction. The following TaqMan Assays-on-Demand (Applied Biosystems) were used: ADIPOQ (Hs00605917_m1); BMP2 (Hs00154192_m1); BMPR1A (Hs01034913_g1); BMPR1B (Hs01010965_m1); BMPR2 (Hs00176148_m1); SMAD6 (Hs00178579_m1); GREM1 (Hs01879841_s1); GREM2 (Hs03986140_s1); ID1 (Hs03676575_s1); PPARG2 (Hs01115510_m1); 18s (Hs99999901_s1) and PPIA (Hs99999904_m1). Data were captured on an ABI Prism 7900HT. Relative transcript expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt relative quantification method [24 (link)] where ΔCt = Assay efficiency(min Ct – Sample Ct). The ΔCt values of target genes were normalised to ΔCt values of a stably expressed reference transcript; 18s was used for 14 day BMP2 treatments, PPIA was used for all other experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Gene Expression via qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 0.5 μg of total RNA using a High Capacity Reverse Transcription kit. SYBER Green qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate using a 1:10 dilution of cDNA with custom-designed primers [HRPT1 (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase-1): forward TTGCTTTCCTTGGTCAGGCA, reverse ATCCAACACTTCGTGGGGTC; HNF1 (hepatocyte nuclear factor 1): forward TCCTTCCAGCTAGTGACCCA, reverse CAGGCTCTGGCACAGAGTAG]. Reactions were carried out using a Rotor-Gene 6000 machine. TAQMAN qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate using a 1:30 dilution of cDNA and Applied Biosystems assays (Table 1) and KAPA Probe Fast Master Mix (KAPA Biosystems). Reactions were run on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT machine. To adjust for variations in the cDNA synthesis, each gene was normalized to that of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase-1 (HPRT1) and or GAPDH mRNA using the comparative (ΔΔCT) method (41 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Adipose Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from abdominal and gluteal AT biopsies23 (link) and preadipocytes21 (link) and reverse transcribed as previously described. Complementary (c) DNA was synthesised from total RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies, Warrington, UK). Quantitative (q) PCR was performed in triplicate on cDNA diluted 1/20 with Kapa Probe Fast Mastermix (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) in an 8μl reaction. The following TaqMan Assays-on-Demand (Applied Biosystems) were used: ADIPOQ (Hs00605917_m1); BMP2 (Hs00154192_m1); BMPR1A (Hs01034913_g1); BMPR1B (Hs01010965_m1); BMPR2 (Hs00176148_m1); SMAD6 (Hs00178579_m1); GREM1 (Hs01879841_s1); GREM2 (Hs03986140_s1); ID1 (Hs03676575_s1); PPARG2 (Hs01115510_m1); 18s (Hs99999901_s1) and PPIA (Hs99999904_m1). Data were captured on an ABI Prism 7900HT. Relative transcript expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt relative quantification method24 (link) where ΔCt = Assay efficiency(min Ct – Sample Ct). The ΔCt values of target genes were normalised to ΔCt values of a stably expressed reference transcript; 18s was used for 14 day BMP2 treatments, PPIA was used for all other experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Adipogenic Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed in PBS and harvested in Tri-Reagent (Ambion, AM9738) by scraping. Total RNA was extracted and quantified (Nanodrop) before using 750 ng to synthesize cDNA (High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit, Life Technologies, UK, 4368813). qPCR was performed on a 1/40 cDNA dilution using Taqman Assays-on-Demand (Applied Biosystems: CEBPA- Hs0029972_m1, CEBPB- Hs00942496_s1, PPARG- Hs01115729_m1, ADIPOQ- Hs00605917_m1, LEP- Hs00174877m1, INSR- Hs00961557_m1, GLUT4- Hs00168966_m1, FASN- Hs00188012_m1, ELOVL6- Hs00907564_m1, SCD- Hs00748952_m1, DGAT2- Hs01017541_m1, PNPLA2- Hs00386101_m1, PLIN1- Hs00160173_m1, LIPE- Hs00193510_m1) and Kapa Probe Fast Mastermix (Kapa Biosystems) on a QuantStudio 7 Flex (ABI). Triplicate reactions were performed in a final volume of 6 µL. Relative transcript expression was calculated using the ΔΔCt relative quantification method [26 (link)]. The ΔCt values of target genes were normalized to the ΔCt (geometric mean) of reference transcripts 18S, PGK1, PPIA and UBC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of RNA Expression Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. First-strand complementary DNA was synthesized using SuperScript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Life Technologies). qRT-PCR was performed using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, NJ, USA) with a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mRNA expression levels were determined by normalizing to cyclophilin-A mRNA expression. The primers employed for qRT-PCR were as follows: ETAR Fw: 5′-GGGATCACCGTCCTCAACCT-3′; ETAR Rev: 5′-CAGGAATGGCCAGGATAAAGG-3′; ZEB1 Fw: 5′-GCAGTCCAAGAACCACCCTT-3′; ZEB1 Rev: 5′-GGGCGGTGTAGAATCAGAGT-3’; pri-miR-200b Fw: 5’-AGCAGCTCCTGGAAC-3′; pri-miR-200b Rev: 5′-CACGTGCTGCCTTGT-3′; pri-miR-200c Fw: 5′-AGCCAGGGATCTGCA-3′; pri-miR-200c Rev: 5′-ACCTTGGGTCAGGCA-3′; cyclophilin-A Fw: 5′-TTCATCTGCACTG CCAAGAC-3′; cyclophilin-A Rev: 5′-TCGAGTTGTCCACAGTCAGC-3′. For miRNA analysis RNA was reverse transcribed using the hsa-miR-141, hsa-miR-200a, hsa-miR-200b, hsa-miR-200c, hsa-miR-429, or U6 snRNATaqMan MicroRNA Assay systems (Applied Biosystems) and qRT-PCR was performed by using Kapa Probe Fast Master Mix (KapaBiosystems, MA, USA). miRNA levels were normalized to U6 snRNA. Final data were obtained by using 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!