The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

51 protocols using phoenix automated microbiology system

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of MDR Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility of the bacterial isolates to various antimicrobial agents was determined using a BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson), as described previously [10 (link)]. Antimicrobial susceptibility of all the isolates (to cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, meropenem, and levofloxacin) was confirmed by a disk diffusion method, following the guidelines and criteria of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute [25 ]. The definition of MDR was isolates with resistance ≥3 classes of the following antimicrobial agents: antipseudomonal cephalosporins, antipseudomonal carbapenems, β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, antipseudomonal fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides [26 (link)]. The susceptibility of the ACB and P. aeruginosa isolates to various antimicrobial agents was determined by use of the automated system, and these isolates were confirmed to be MDR strains. All MDR strains were stored at −80 °C in bacterial culture broth (Becton Dickinson) containing 20% glycerol, until experimental procedures were done.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nasal Swab Screening for S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A swab from each opening of the anterior nares were collected using pre-moistened sterile cotton swabs with normal saline solution, and were transported in Amie's transport medium.
Nasal swabs were processed within 2 h of collection and primary plating was done on mannitol salt agar (MSA) without oxacillin to screen for S. aureus. After inoculation, plates were incubated at 35 °C in oxygen and read after 24 and 48 h. Each distinctive morphotype of mannitol fermenting colonies (yellow colonies) was selected from the MSA plate and sub-cultured on a 5% sheep blood agar plate. The colony was confirmed as S. aureus by catalase, slide coagulase (Staphaurex, Remel) and DNase tests. BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) was used for identification and antibiotics susceptibility testing for S. aureus species, which included testing for inducible clindamycin resistance. Tested antibiotics included: penicillin, oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, sulfamethaxazole, vancomycin, linezolid, rifampin, ciprofloxacin and daptomycin. Any S. aureus that was resistant to oxacillin and/or cefoxitin was defined as MRSA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

E. coli Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MVAMC clinical laboratory identified the E. coli isolates using standard methods and determined susceptibility to 12 antimicrobial agents and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production using the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) per manufacturer guidelines, utilising NMIC/ID-123 panels. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) results were interpreted according to Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute criteria [5 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated Microbial Resistance Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Species identification and susceptibility tests were performed in the clinical laboratory using an automated microdilution method (BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System; Becton, Dickinson and Co., Tokyo, Japan). The pathogens were considered resistant to ampicillin or vancomycin if they exceeded the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints (MIC of ≥16 μg/mL for ampicillin and ≥ 32 μg/mL for vancomycin).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
P. aeruginosa was identified by the BD Phoenix
Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson). The system is intended
for the rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility
testing (AST) of clinically significant bacteria. Tests used in the
Phoenix ID panels comprise a 45-well ID side that includes tests for
fermentation, oxidation, degradation, and hydrolysis of various substances
and an 85-well side containing dried antimicrobial agents in coordination
with the hospital formulary as QC and growth wells. The technique
involves exposing bacteria to decreasing concentrations of antimicrobial
agents. The Phoenix panels were inoculated according to the manufacturer’s
instructions as follows. A standardized inoculum of 0.5 McFarland
was prepared in Phoenix ID Broth, gently vortexed, and measured using
the BD PhoenixSpec nephelometer to ensure the correct inoculum; then,
25 μL of the inoculum was added to the Phoenix AST broth after
the addition of one drop of the Phoenix AST indicator solution. Once
inoculated with the solutions from both tubes, the panels were placed
in the Phoenix instrument and continuously incubated at 35 °C.
The instrument reads the panels every 20 min for ≤16 h. The
final ID and AST results are transferred via the EpiCenter to the
LIS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Respiratory samples, included sputum culture and tracheal aspirates when on mechanical ventilation were collected. They were inoculated, first directly, then after a 100-fold dilution, onto Columbia agar + 5% sheep blood, Chocolate blood agar and 2 additional selective media; MacConkey agar and Columbia agar + 5% sheep blood + Colistin + Nalidixic acid.
S. maltophilia species were identified using the BD phoenix automated microbiology system (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, Md., USA). S. maltophilia species counts were determined after 24 h of growth at 37 °C and expressed as colony-forming unit per milliliter (CFU/mL). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing technique consisted of a determination of the minium inhibitory concentrations (MICs) to TMP-SMX, levofloxacin, ceftazidime and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, using the same BD phoenix automated system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Detecting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Swab cultures (eSwab sterile liquid collection kit, Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD) were plated on blood agar plates in the microbiology laboratory and were incubated for growth up to 48 hours. For positive cultures, determination of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) status was performed using the BD PHOENIX Automated Microbiology System (Becton-Dickinson) by oxacillin susceptibility. The mupirocin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was obtained using mupirocin E-test strips (0.064–1024 µg/mL; AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The break point for mupirocin susceptibility was ≤1.0 µg/mL.13
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Standardized Urine Culture and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Urine cultures were tested by a standardized method using agar medium as described previously.7 (link) Microorganisms were isolated using standardized biochemical procedures8 and identified by the automatic diagnostic BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton, Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) according to published protocols.9 (link) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of isolates were assessed based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations by the disk diffusion method using Mueller–Hinton medium.10 Antimicrobial agents and testing were examined by BD BBL Sensi-Disc (Becton, Dickinson Sparks, MD, USA). Antibiotics used are listed in Table 1. The ESBL test was assessed by the formation of an inhibition zone (>5 mm) by clavulanic acid (CLA) on the middle CAZ/CLA disc surrounded by CTX, CTX/CLA, cefpodoxime, and cefepime discs based on the double disc synergy test in both Kobe and Taipei.11
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Clonal Evaluation of Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains isolated from different patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICU) were used. Thereof, 5 were isolated from endothracheal aspirates, 2 from bronchoalveolar lavage, and 1 from blood, wound, and pleural fluid each. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility were performed using BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson, NJ, USA). Antimicrobial susceptibilities against colistin, sulbactam, netilmicin and vancomycin were investigated using microdilution method [11 ]. The clonal relationship of strains was explored using rep-PCR (DiversiLab, bioMérieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification and Susceptibility of Respiratory Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of each organism and antimicrobial susceptibility test were performed at our institution. Blood cultures were inoculated into BacT/ALERT® 3D bottles (SYSMEX bioMérieux Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were identified using standard methods (BD Phoenix™ Automated Microbiology System, Becton, Dickinson and Company, NJ, USA). Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [11 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!