The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Evos fl auto 2 cell imaging system

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System is a fully automated, high-performance microscope designed for live-cell and fixed-sample imaging. It features advanced optics, powerful image acquisition capabilities, and user-friendly software to enable high-quality imaging of a wide range of cell types and samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

56 protocols using evos fl auto 2 cell imaging system

1

Cell Viability, Migration, and Invasion Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the cell viability assay, all cell lines were seeded at a density of 5×103 in 96-well plates. After 24 hours, cells were serum-starved for 18 hours then continuously exposed to 2% control or 2% DIO mouse serum in SFM for 48 hours. MTT reagent was used to assess cell viability levels as previously described (24), with the absorbance read at 570 nm on a Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
To assess cell migration, all cell lines were seeded in 2-Well Culture-Inserts (ibidi, Munich, GER) in 24-well plates with 7.5×104 cells per insert well. After 24 hours, cells were serum-starved for 18 hours, then inserts removed and cells continuously exposed to 2% control or 2% DIO mouse serum in SFM for 6 hours. The EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (Invitrogen) was used to capture images (x10 magnification) of the wound diameter at baseline and at 6 hours.
To measure invasive capacity, 1.0×104 cells were seeded in SFM in each 24-well Corning Matrigel® Invasion Chamber (8.0 micron; Corning, NY, USA), and 2% control or 2% DIO mouse serum in SFM was placed beneath the chambers. After 24 hours, the invading cells were fixed in 100% methanol for 1 minute, then stained for 30 minutes with 0.5% crystal violet in 50% methanol. The EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (Invitrogen) was used to capture images (x10 magnification) of the stained cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Endothelial Cell Viability Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To exclude potential degeneration of the endothelial cells, we actively tested the endothelial functionality by the ability for the uptake of acetylated low density lipoproteins by the scavenger cell pathway using a commercial assay (Alexa Fluor 488 AcLDL assay, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [43 (link),44 (link),45 (link)]. For AcLDL assay, the endothelial cells were seeded in 24-well plates and cultivated until 90% confluence. The assay was performed as recommended by the manufacturer. Briefly, the cells were washed two times in a 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS+ solution for 5 min, followed by adding 400 µL of cell culture medium containing 0.0.125% AcLDL assay solution and incubation at 37 °C for 3.5 h. After adding one drop of NucBlue live staining solution for Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) staining, (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), the cells were incubated for another 30 min in the incubator. After washing another three times, images were directly obtained with a conventional fluorescent microscope (EVOS FL Auto 2 cell imaging system, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Astrocyte Activation in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The brain tissues of the mice were perfused with a 10% paraformaldehyde solution, followed by a 48 h post-fixation in the same solution. Tissues were then cryoprotected in a 30% sucrose solution for 72 h. Coronal cryosections, 1.0 mm posterior to the bregma and 30 μm thick, were prepared. For the immunohistochemical staining of astrocytic GFAP, brain cryosections were rinsed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity. After rinsing with TBS and a blocking step with 5% BSA, the sections were incubated at 4 °C overnight with a GFAP-specific antibody (1:300; rabbit polyclonal, Chemicon, Temecula, CA, USA). This was followed by incubation with a secondary antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor-594 (1:300; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). The sections were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma-Aldrich) to visualize cellular nuclei. GFAP staining was used in combination with DAPI staining to identify astrocytes based on their characteristic morphology and location within the brain tissue. Following staining, all samples were immediately evaluated and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (EVOS FL Auto2 Cell imaging system; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The area of GFAP-positive cells was quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Time-lapse Imaging of Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used for imaging cells in culture over time for time-lapse videos. Cells were maintained in a live cell chamber at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 85% humidity and areas around neurospheres were scanned every 20 min. Images were compiled at 15 fps using ImageJ to generate time-lapse videos.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

3D Spheroid Formation and Cytotoxicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formation of 3D spheroids of HepG2 cells was achieved by seeding cells at a density of 2000 cells/well in an ultra-low attachment 96-well plate (Corning Life Sciences, MA, USA). Once the spheroids formed, they were treated with different concentrations of CP. Media was replaced with a fresh medium containing an appropriate concentration of CP every 48 hr for 12 days. During the incubation, spheroids were observed for their growth in terms of their diameter and surface area using EVOS FL Auto 2 cell imaging system (ThermoFisher scientific, Waltham, USA). On the 12th day, cells in spheroid were stained and imaged for live/dead cell analysis method using LIVE/DEAD® Viability/Cytotoxicity kit (Thermo Fisher scientific, Waltham, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detection of BLV Syncytia Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The blood samples were treated with red blood cell lysis buffer (Abbott Diagnostics Technologies AS, Oslo, Norway) to remove red blood cells, and the pellets were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then resuspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) [53 (link)]. WBCs (1 × 105 cells/well) were applied to the BLV reporter cell lines, CC81-GREMG (5 × 104 cells/well), [23 (link),26 (link),39 (link),54 (link)] that were pre-cultured for one day in a 12-well plate. After 3 days of incubation, the plate was washed with PBS, and fresh DMEM with 10% FBS was added and incubated for up to 48 h. The cells were washed with PBS and fixed with PBS containing 3.7% formaldehyde and 10 mg/mL Hoechst 33,342 (Millipore Sigma). The fixed cells were observed for fluorescent-positive syncytia using an EVOSFL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The permanently BLV-infected FLK-BLV cell line [55 (link),56 (link)] was used as a positive control for this assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Staining of 2D Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 2D cell lines were seeded in a μ-Slide 8-Well chambered coverslip (ibidi, catalog no. 80826) and treated as previously described. Cells were washed with PBS (Gibco) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. After a 5-min PBS wash, cells were permeabilized by the addition of PBS containing 0.25% Triton X-100 for 15 min. After two 5-min washes with PBS, cells were incubated with a blocking solution (1% bovine serum albumin in PBS-T (PBS + 0.1% Tween-20)) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with diluted primary antibody in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. After three 5-min PBS washes, cells were incubated with diluted secondary antibody in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. After three 5-min PBS washes, coverslips were imaged using an EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The antibodies are given in Supplementary Table 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Wound Healing and Proliferation Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For wound healing assays, PANC-1 cells were seeded into six-well plates (8 × 105 cells/well), transfected with 50 nM siRNA, and cultured for 24 h, as described above. After treating the cells with mitomycin-C (10 µg/mL) for 2 h, three parallel scratches were made into the confluent monolayer while using a pipette tip. The washed cells were incubated in DMEM without supplements. Images of six randomly chosen areas at the scratches were taken every 3 h for 48 h using EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Germany). Stacks of all images made for one point within the scratch were generated using Fiji (Version 1.52i) and analyzed by Scratch Assay Analyzer Plugin (MiToBo, Universität Halle) [55 (link)]. Cell migration was calculated in [µm/h]. The velocities were normalized to the control of each cell line. For proliferation assays, the cells were transfected with 33 nM siRNA. 24 h later, cells (5 × 104) were seeded into 12-well plates and then incubated for 12 h to allow for cell attachment. Images of 5–6 randomly chosen areas/well were taken in 12 h interval, using EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System. The cells were counted while using Fiji software at time points 0 h (≙ 36 h after transfection) at least 48 h (≙ 84 h after transfection). The doubling time was calculated for each experimental setup.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Imaging and Quantification of Resistant Cell Colonies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each well was imaged using an EVOS FL Auto 2 Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher, MA) at desired time points. The scope and accessories were programmed using the Celleste Imaging Analysis software (Thermo Fisher, MA). Customized MATLAB code was used stitch subplot and generate images of each entire colony. Images were analyzed using Image J (NIH). Outlines of each colony were traced manually in ImageJ. Area measurements were used to calculate colony diameter assuming each colony is a perfect circle. To calculate the fraction of resistant cells in ImageJ, first, the background was removed by setting a pixel threshold. Next, the area occupied by the cells was calculated using the circle and analyze function in ImageJ. As all cells’ nuclei were stained with Hoechst stain (Invitrogen™ NucBlue™ Live ReadyProbes™, ThermoFisher, MA), and all wildtype cells were transduced to express Citrine (25 (link)), the fraction of resistant cells were obtained from the values of (Hoechst – Citrine)/Hoechst. The same background threshold was maintained for all images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Luminescent Cell Viability Assay for GBM Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GBM cells plated in 96 well plates were transfected with miRNAs as described above. Four days later, each wells were treated with equal volume of CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. After 10 min of incubation, the luminescence intensity was measured by Synergy H1 multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, USA). When GBM12-RFP cell was used, the end-point cell viability was imaged by visualizing RFP-positive cells with excitation 532 nm and emission 588 nm using EVOS FL Auto2 Cell Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!