The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using bstxi

1

Cloning of sgRNA Expression Vectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual perfectly matched or mismatched sgRNAs were cloned essentially as described previously18 (link). Briefly, two complementary oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA Technologies), containing the targeting region as well as overhangs matching those left by restriction digest of the backbone with BstXI and BlpI, were annealed and ligated into an sgRNA expression vector digested with BstXI (NEB or Thermo Fisher Scientific) and BlpI (NEB) or Bpu1102I (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ligation product was transformed into Stellar chemically competent E. coli cells (Takara Bio) and plasmid was prepared following standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nucleosome Assembly and Labeling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleosomal DNA templates were prepared using methods similar to those previously described (Koch et al., 2002 (link); Li and Wang, 2012 (link)). Briefly, each DNA construct consisted of two separate segments. A ∼1.1 kbp anchoring segment was amplified, by PCR, from plasmid pRL574 using a digoxigenin-labeled primer and then subsequently digested with BstXI (NEB, Ipswich, MA) to produce an overhang. The unzipping templates were amplified, by PCR, from the plasmids described above and amplified with a biotin-labeled primer, digested with BstXI, and dephosphorylated using CIP (NEB, Ipswich, MA) to introduce a nick into the final DNA template. Nucleosomes were assembled from purified HeLa histones onto the unzipping fragment by a well-established salt dialysis method (Lee and Narlikar, 2001 (link)). The two segments were joined by ligation immediately prior to use. This produced a complete template labeled with a single dig tag on one end and a biotin tag located 7 bp after the nick in one DNA strand.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cloning of sgRNA Expression Vectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual perfectly matched or mismatched sgRNAs were cloned essentially as described previously18 (link). Briefly, two complementary oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA Technologies), containing the targeting region as well as overhangs matching those left by restriction digest of the backbone with BstXI and BlpI, were annealed and ligated into an sgRNA expression vector digested with BstXI (NEB or Thermo Fisher Scientific) and BlpI (NEB) or Bpu1102I (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ligation product was transformed into Stellar chemically competent E. coli cells (Takara Bio) and plasmid was prepared following standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis in Zebrafish Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 to induce site-specific mutations in injected larvae, we used restriction digest assays (Supplemental Figure 2). CRISPR guides were designed to target sequences containing restriction digest sites, such that when indels were introduced by DNA repair, the restriction site is disrupted. Genomic DNA was extracted from individual larvae at 2 dpf. Larvae were placed individually in 0.2 ml PCR tubes in 90 μl 50 mM NaOH and boiled at 95° for 20 min. Ten μl Tris-HCl pH 8 was added as a reaction buffer and mixed thoroughly. RT-PCR using Firepol® (Solis BioDyne) was used to amplify a 235 bp region (for cxcr4b) and a 259 bp region (for cxcl12a) around the PAM site. Gene specific primers were designed using the Primer 3 web tool (http://primer3.ut.ee/). Primer sequences were as follows: cxcrb4_fwTCCCGTATACTGTAGGGAGGAcxcr4b_revTTTTTGCATTTTGTTTTCTTGcxcl12a_fwTTCTCTGTGGGACTGTGTTGACcxcl12a_revTTCGAAAATTTGACCCAAAAGT. Restriction enzyme digests were then performed using bsII at 55° for 2 h (for cxcr4b) and bstXi (New England Biolabs) at 37° for 2 h (for cxcl12a). Products were run using gel electrophoresis on a 2% gel (Supplemental Figure 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of CANVAS AAGGG Repeat Expansions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RFC1 locus containing the AAGGG repeat expansion was amplified with long-range PCR from the gDNA of a CANVAS patient carrying the biallelic AAGGG repeat expansion and a healthy control carrying two (AAAAG)11 alleles. PCR products were cloned into the pcDNA3.1/TOPO vector (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers and thermocycling conditions are provided in Supplementary Table 3. The size of the insert was determined by digestion with BstXI (New England Biolabs). The integrity of repeats and their orientation were confirmed by DNA sequencing (Eurofins Genomics), which revealed uninterrupted 94 × (CCCTT) and 54 × (AAGGG) repeats in mutant clones, as well as 11 × (CTTTT) and 11 × (AAAAG) repeat sequences in the wild-type clone. Once confirmed, the four clones used for the experimental procedures were amplified using a Maxi-prep plasmid purification system (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generation of CRISPR interference sgRNA expression vectors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strong sgRNAs against essential genes or cell surface markers were selected from the hCRISPRi-v2 library (Horlbeck et al., 2016a (link); Nuñez et al., 2021 (link)). Intermediate-activity sgRNAs were selected either from the hCRISPRi-v2 library or by incorporating defined mismatches in strong sgRNAs (Jost et al., 2020 (link)). All sgRNA sequences used for individual evaluation are listed in Supplementary file 8.
Individual sgRNA expression constructs were cloned as described previously (Gilbert et al., 2014 (link)). Briefly, two complementary oligonucleotides (IDT), containing the sgRNA targeting region as well as overhangs matching those left by restriction digest of the vector with BstXI and BlpI, were annealed and ligated into pCRISPRia-v2 (pU6-sgRNA EF1Alpha-puro-T2A-BFP with two SbfI sites flanking the sgRNA expression cassette, Addgene #84832; Horlbeck et al., 2016a (link)) or pU6-sgRNA EF1Alpha-puro-T2A-mCherry (a gift from Gregory Ow and Eric Collisson, UCSF; Jost et al., 2020 (link)) digested with BstXI (NEB or Thermo Fisher Scientific) and BlpI (NEB) or Bpu1102I (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ligation product was transformed into Stellar chemically competent Escherichia coli cells (Takara Bio) and plasmid was prepared following standard protocols. The resulting sgRNA expression vectors were individually packaged into lentivirus as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Enzymatic Digestion Protocol Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
REs (NcoI, BtgI, XbaI, NdeI, NheI, BmtI, BamHI, XcmI, PflMI, BstEII, NcoI, HpaI, BbsI, BsgI, AfeI, BstXI, StuI, BsrGI, and EcoRI, accompanied with respective buffers) were from New England Biolabs (NEB). Another NdeI (accompanied with H buffer), and recombinant DNase I (RNase-free) were from Takara-Bio. Another NcoI (accompanied with H buffer) and DNase I were from Nippon Gene. Hi-Lo DNA marker was from Bionexus. DNA primers were synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific. Other chemicals were from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Construction of Nicked DNA Template

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 13.8-kbp DNA template containing two nicks is composed of three DNA segments connected by two short dsDNA adaptors, 1 and 2 (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). Two 4.0-kbp dsDNA segments were PCR amplified from the lambda DNA (Thermo) using biotin-labeled primers (SI Appendix, Table S1). A 5.8-kbp dsDNA unwinding segment was PCR amplified from the lambda DNA. The three resulting DNA fragments were all digested with BstXI (NEB) to create an overhang. The adaptors were produced by annealing two oligonucleotides, one of which misses the 5′ phosphate, allowing for the automatic generation of the nicks after the ligation (SI Appendix, Table S1). Two adaptors were first ligated with the 5.8-kbp DNA segment, and then the ligation product was purified. The final product was produced by ligating the two 4.0-kbp DNA segments and the 5.8-kbp DNA fragment with the adaptors at a 3:3:1 ratio using T4 ligase (NEB).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

STING Enhancer Perturbation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The perturbation system was adopted from a previous report (38 (link)). pgRNA-humanized (plasmid #44248) and pHR-SFFV-dCas9-BFP-KRAB (plamid #46911), both required for the perturbation, were purchased from Addgene. Target-specific single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) for the STING enhancer were designed using the UCSC genome browser. The sgRNA sequences used were CCTCCCCCTGTGTCATACCTTGA (hg38/Human, chr5:139,481,141–139,481,163) and CCCACTCCCAGTACTCAGCTCAG (hg38/Human, chr5:139481074-139481096). pgRNA-humanuized was linearized by BstxI (NEW ENGLAND BioLabs, #R0113S). Oligonucleotides containing the sequence of sgRNAs were subcloned into the linearized pgRNA-humanized using NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly (NEW ENGLAND BioLabs, #E2621). The oligonucleotides were synthesized by Integrated DNA technologies (IDT):
5’-CTATAAGTATCCCTTGGAGAACCACCTTGCCTCCCCCTGTGTCATACCTTGAGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAA-3’
5’- CTATAAGTATCCCTTGGAGAACCACCTTGCCCACTCCCAGTACTCAGCTCAGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAA-3’. pHR-SFFV-dCas9-BFP-KRAB and pgRNA-humanized-sgRNA were stably transduced into MDA-MB-436 and SUM159PT Tax-R cells. Transduced cells were selected by 1 μg/mL puromycin over 2 weeks, and then sorted by BFP expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Lentiviral CEBPA CRISPRi Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual sgRNA expression vectors were cloned by first annealing complementary synthetic oligonucleotide sequences containing each sgRNA protospacer (Table S3) flanked by BstXI (New England Biolabs) and BlpI (New England Biolabs) restriction sites (Integrated DNA Technologies). Each double-stranded annealed pair was then ligated into a BstXI/BlpI-digested pCRISPRi-v2 expression vector containing a BFP cassette. Each sgRNA expression vector was then packaged into lentiviruses in HEK 293T Lenti-X cells and were individually transduced into either two or three color CEBPA CRISPRi reporter lines at a MOI < 1, resulting in ~20–30% infected cells by BFP expression. Cells were sorted on BFP 2 days post-transduction to select for sgRNA expression and allowed to recover in RPMI 1640 for 6 days. Reporter expression was then measured by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!