The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Amoxicillin clavulanate

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom

Amoxicillin/clavulanate is a combination antibiotic medication used in laboratory settings. It consists of the active ingredients amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. Amoxicillin is a beta-lactam antibiotic that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis, while clavulanic acid is a beta-lactamase inhibitor that enhances the effectiveness of amoxicillin against certain bacteria.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

26 protocols using amoxicillin clavulanate

1

Screening ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cefuroxime resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were screened for ESBL-production by the double disc synergy test using ceftazidime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (30 µg discs) (Oxoid Ltd) as the inhibitory substance. Test was considered positive for ESBL when there was a synergy between any two antibiotics (Fig. 1) with amoxicillin/clavulanate.

Image showing double-disk diffusion method (photo by Nahid Karim).

Susceptibility for eleven antibiotics (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, piperacillin-tazobactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, Cefuroxime and meropenem) in all ESBL-positive fecal isolates and a subset of arbitrary selected non-ESBL producing fecal E coli was determined using the disc diffusion method (Oxoid Ltd) and breakpoints according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines at the time of the study. Resistant and intermediate isolates were considered as resistance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of GNB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Susceptibility testing of the GNB was examined by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion assay on Mueller-Hinton agar medium (Oxoid, England) against 18 antibiotic disks following the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines [17 ]. The following antibiotics were examined: amikacin (30 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (20/10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefuroxime (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), colistin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), nitrofurantoin (50 μg), piperacillin(100 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (23.75 μg/1.25 μg) (Oxoid, England). In brief, standardized suspension of each isolate conforming 0.5 McFarland turbidity was inoculated onto two Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Then, nine antibiotic disks were placed onto each plate with recommended distance, followed by overnight incubation at 37°C. The strain of E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as control and was tested each time when susceptibility testing was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was carried out using Kirby Bauer’s Disc Diffusion method and interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines (2018).
The following antibiotics for the Enterobacteriaceae were tested: Ceftriaxone (30μg), Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (25μg), Piperacillin-tazobactam (110 μg), Ticarcillin-clavulanate (85μg), Tetracycline (30μg), Amikacin (30μg), Gentamicin (10μg), Ciprofloxacin (5μg), Meropenem (10μg), Azithromycin (15μg), Chloramphenicol (30μg), Nitrofurantoin (300μg), Nalidixic acid (30μg), Ceftazidime (30μg) and Amoxicillin-clavulanate (30μg) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hants, UK). Quality control was ensured by using standard strains (Klebsiella pneumoniae, ATCC 700603 and Escherichia coli, ATCC 25922) in determining susceptibility or otherwise of stool isolates. The definition of multidrug resistance (MDR) was based on the resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobial agents [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST, 2017 guidelines (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/). The following antimicrobial agents were tested: amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, tobramycin, gentamicin, amikacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). MICs of nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin were determined by MIC strips (Liofilchem, Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli and P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pure colonies from each sample with E. coli and P. aeruginosa contamination were randomly selected for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Pure isolates of E. coli, and P. aeruginosa were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing using the Kirby–Bauer Disc Diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar, as recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [23 ]. Zones of inhibition were measured in millimeters and recorded for each antibiotic.
Antibiotics used for E. coli isolates included amoxicillin–clavulanate (20/10 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), chloramphenicol (20/10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg) and trimethoprim–sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg) (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK). For P. aeruginosa, piperacillin–tazobactam (100/10µg), aztreonam (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg) and ciprofloxacin (5 µg) (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed using the agar disk diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2018 ). The antibiotic disks (Oxoid, UK) ampicillin (10 µg), amoxicillin-clavulanate (20/10 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), cefoperazone-sulbactam (75/30 µg), cefazolin (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), netilmicin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), norfloxacin (10 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), and fosfomycin (200 µg) were used. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control in all antibiogram tests. Whether a strain was MDR was determined on the basis of acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories (Magiorakos et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Disk Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility test by the disk diffusion method was performed to determine the resistance patterns of the isolates to 17 antibiotics: cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, aztreonam, ceftazidime/clavulanate, cefotaxime/clavulanate, cephalothin, cefuroxime sodium, cefepime, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim [Oxoid, England; disc contents according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines]. All antimicrobial testing was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar by the flooding technique and data interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood bacteria enrichment medium, blood agar plate, M-H agar and M-H broth were purchased for Hangzhou Tianhe Microorganism Reagents Company. Tested antimicrobial agents included cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ampicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, amoxicillin clavulanate, meropenem, imipenem, amikacin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, tigecycline (Oxoid, British). The PCR detection kits and DNA marker were from Beijing Tiangen Company. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Tris, ethidium bromide and agarose were for Shanghai Shenggong Company. MicroScanWalkAway 40 Plus Microbiology System (Siemens, Newark, DE, USA). SP1000 PCR amplification instrument (Bio-Rad Company, USA), DYY-III electrophoresis apparatus (Beijing Liuyi Instrument Factory), Tanon1600 gel imaging system (Shanghai Tianneng Company).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using standard disc diffusion method19 . Tested antimicrobials were belongs to β-lactams, FQs, aminoglycosides, tetracycline, folate pathway inhibitors and nitrofurans classes. Amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC, 20/10µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP, 100/10 µg), ceftriaxone (CRO, 30 µg), cefpodoxime (CPD, 10 µg), cefuroxime (CXM, 30 µg), aztreonam (ATM, 30 µg), imipenem (IMP, 10 µg), meropenem (MEM, 10 µg), gentamicin (CN, 10 µg), doxycycline (DO, 30µg) and ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5µg) were purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK). The other antimicrobial discs including levofloxacin (LEV, 5 µg), ofloxacin (OFX, 5µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT, 1.25/23.75 µg) and nitrofurantoin (F, 300 µg) were obtained from Bioanalysis (Ankra, Turkey). Isolates which were resistant to at least three antimicrobial classes were considered as MDR isolates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Shigella

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed on Mueller–Hinton Agar using the Kirby–Bauer method.25 (link) The total Shigella strains were analysed according to the interpretation criteria proposed by the CLSI.26 The antibiotics used were: ampicillin (10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanate (20/10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg) and nitrofurantoin (300 μg) (Oxoid, England). For quality control, the reference strains Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were used. The strains were considered MDR when they presented resistance to more than two classes of antimicrobials.25 (link) Additionally, the determination of the production of ESBL was carried out using the Jarlier method.27 (link) The presence of ESBL was manifested by the synergistic effect between the inhibitor (amoxicillin/clavulanate) and the cephalosporin antimicrobial discs (cefotaxime and ceftazidime).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!