The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ecat hrrt

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany, United States

The ECAT HRRT is a high-resolution research tomograph designed for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. It offers advanced imaging capabilities for scientific research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using ecat hrrt

1

Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both PET scans were acquired in a high-resolution research tomograph (ECAT, HRRT, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at the Max-Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne. Subjects were asked to discontinue their medication and were scanned in a supine position. Rigid body transformation ensured motion correction of PET frames and the last four to nine (FDOPA-PET) or three to six (FDG-PET) frames were averaged for further analyses. Averaged PET images were co-registered to subject’s fMRI data while non-linear registration ensured normalization to the respective template in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space57 (link),58 (link). Normalized PET images were finally smoothed with a 6 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) isotropic kernel and intensity normalized by using proportional scaling in SPM12 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PET Imaging of Amyloid Beta Deposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain Aβ load were assessed with positron emission tomography (PET) using a High‐Resolution Research Tomograph (ECAT HRRT; CTI/Siemens) and 11C‐Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB). The supporting information provides additional details regarding PET acquisitions and preprocessing.
Utilizing MINC‐tools,20 PET images were co‐registered to the T1w MRI scan and non‐linearly transformed into MNI‐space (Montreal Neurological Institute) to achieve spatial normalization. PET images were then summed from 60 to 90 minutes post injection and the resulting images divided by the mean cerebellar gray matter signal,21 to generate PiB standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) maps. Then, each patient's composite cortical PiB‐SUVr level was calculated as the weighted average of PiB‐SUVr levels across bilateral inferior/lateral parietal, inferior frontal, middle/inferior temporal, posterior cingulate, and parahippocampal cortices as defined by an atlas.21 Finally, patients were defined as either amyloid positive (Aβ+) or amyloid negative (Aβ‐) based on their composite cortical PiB‐SUVr lying above or below 1.5. A threshold of 1.5 was selected as this naturally divided the bimodal distribution of composite cortical SUVrs into high and low subgroups.18
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Dynamic PET Acquisition Protocol for Brain Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after each of the three stimulation conditions, participants were transferred to a wheel chair and transported to the PET facility with noise‐cancelation earphones and eye covers still in place to minimize motor activity and feedback and sensory inputs. Participants were placed on the bed and a 6‐min transmission scan (137Cs point source) was initiated at 54 min postinjection. Exactly 60 min postinjection, a 60‐min dynamic PET acquisition (12 × 5 min frames) was performed on a high‐resolution PET system (ECAT HRRT; CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN) Full scanner details have been published previously (Heiss et al., 2004). The PET scans were reconstructed using an ordered‐subsets expectation maximization three‐dimensional (3D) algorithm into image volumes consisting of 207 axial slices and a 1.22 mm voxel size. Reconstructed images were corrected for random and scatter events, detector efficiency variations, and dead time. Frame‐to‐frame motion correction was performed followed by summation of all frames into one static PET data volume.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

FDG-PET Imaging Preprocessing in Parkinson's Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FDG-PET was performed under standard conditions with an average dose of 185 MBq FDG on a 24-detector ring high-resolution research tomograph (ECAT HRRT, Siemens) and preprocessed in SPM12 (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12) running on MATLAB R2018a (The MathWorks, Inc.). Image acquisition procedure and preprocessing have previously been described in detail [27 (link), 40 ]. FDG-PET acquisition was conducted in the medication OFF-state after at least 12-h discontinuation of levodopa, amantadine and MAO-inhibitors, and 72-h withdrawal from dopamine agonists. For the current analysis, normalized image dimensions were 91/109/91 voxels (x/y/z) sized 2 × 2 × 2 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Resolution PET Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the stimulation, the participants were transferred to a wheel chair and transported to the PET facility, while still wearing noise-cancellation earphones and sleep-goggles. Each participant was placed comfortably on the bed of the high-resolution PET system (ECAT HRRT; CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN, USA). The PET scan protocol has previously been reported (14 (link)). At 54 min post-injection, a 6 min transmission scan (Cs-137 point source) was performed. At exactly 60 min post-injection, the 60 min dynamic PET acquisition (12 × 5 min frames) was initiated. An ordered-subsets expectation maximization 3D algorithm was used to reconstruct the PET scans into image volumes consisting of 207 axial slices and a 1.22 mm voxel size. Frame-to-frame motion correction was made followed by summation of all frames into one static PET data volume. Reconstructed images were revised to detect dead time, random, and scatter events, and detector efficiency variations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Brain PET Imaging using FMPEP-d2 Tracer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An individually molded thermoplastic mask was used to restrain head movement during the scan. The tracer [ 18 F]FMPEP-d2 was given as an antecubital intravenous bolus injection. Emission data was gathered in 3D list-mode first for 60 minutes with the brain-dedicated high-resolution research tomograph (ECAT HRRT, Siemens Medical Solutions). Subjects then came out of the scanner for 30 minutes, after which the scan was continued for another 30 minutes for a total scan range of 0 to 120 minutes.
Emission data were reconstructed using a 3D-OSEM algorithm into 19 frames of increasing length (3x1 min, 5x3 min, 7x6 min and 4x7.5 min) with a 1.22x1.22x1.22 mm 3 isometric voxel-size. Head motion during the scan was corrected by realigning all PET frames to the 12th frame containing the highest uptake on average. Individual frame-to-frame motion correction parameters were inspected and subjects with motion exceeding a predefined 4mm in any direction were scrutinized using head motion tracking data collected during the scan (Polaris, Northern Digital Inc., Canada
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Neuroimaging Protocol for Alzheimer's Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isometric 1 mm T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed with a Skyra 3T system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).
11C-PiB PET was performed with a High Resolution Research Tomograph (ECAT HRRT, CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN) according to a previously published scan protocol [1 (link)]. The pretreatment scans were performed at different time before treatment start, while the posttreatment scans all were performed on the day following the end of the light-therapy, i.e., on day 11. A mean dose of 407 ± 13.8 MBq (for poststimulation scans) and 424 ± 15.3 MBq (for the prestimulation scans) 11C-PiB was injected, and list-mode PET was acquired for 40-90 minutes postinjection. Data was subsequently rebinned into five frames of 10 min each.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

FDG-PET Imaging in Parkinson's Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FDG-PET scans were acquired in 47 PD patients and 11 controls after overnight fasting in the OFF-state since it has been shown that the ON-state could alter neural functions in PD (Tahmasian et al., 2015 (link), 2017 (link)). Images were recorded on a Siemens high-resolution research tomograph (ECAT HRRT) with 207 transaxial image planes and a voxel size of 1.219 mm (isotropic) in 3D acquisition mode. Subjects lay comfortably in a supine position in a quiet room with dimmed light; a vacuum cushion was used to restrict head motion. Following a transmission scan for attenuation correction, 185 MBq 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose were injected. Recording started 20 s after injection and continued for 60 min, with one frame saved every 10 min. Using software VINCI (Vollmar et al., 2003 ), frames were co-registered together; an average of frames 3–6 (minute 20–60) was generated and saved in the Nifti format for the following analysis.
High-resolution T1-weighted MRI scans, acquired on a 3T Siemens Magnetom Prisma with a voxel size of 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm3, were available for 43 of the 47 patients and the 11 controls who underwent FDG-PET. In PD patients, MRI scans were performed under regular dopaminergic medication to reduce head motion (Tahmasian et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

PIB-PET Imaging of Amyloid-β Accumulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PIB-PET-imaging was performed to assess Aβ accumulation in the brain. The PET-scanning protocol has been described previously elsewhere [6 (link)]. The dynamic 90 min [11C]PIB-PET scan was performed using a brain-dedicated high-resolution PET scanner, the ECAT HRRT (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA). [11C]PIB was manufactured as previously reported [42 (link)] in high molar radioactivity (mean 680 MBq/nmol (SD±240)) at the time of injection utilizing in-target produced [11C]methane.
Voxel-by-voxel [11C]PIB standardized uptake values (SUV) were calculated using imaging data from 60 to 90 minutes after the tracer injection. Automated region of interest (ROI) generation was conducted using FreeSurfer software (version 5.3.0, http://freesurfer.net/) and individual T1 weighted MRI data as input. Six ROIs were formed (parietal cortex, prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulum, posterior cingulum, precuneus, lateral temporal cortex based on brain regions where Aβ has been shown to first accumulate in early AD [43–45 (link)]. SUV ratios (SUVRs) were obtained by using the cerebellar cortex as a reference region. A composite cortical PIB score was calculated as the average PIB SUVR over all six ROIs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Functional Brain Changes in Congenital Blindness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PET data were acquired in a group of 7 CB participants (three males aged 41 ± 8 years) and 7 HEAC (aged 25 ± 5 years, four males; HAECDEN) using a Siemens ECAT HRRT at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen, Denmark (Table 1). Participants' MRIs were acquired using a 3 T Siemens Trio MRI scanner at the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. Details of the scans have been published elsewhere [32 (link)]. One among the seven CB participants had limited vision at birth that progressed to complete blindness at the age of seven; all others were completely blind from birth. Structural MRI data were acquired (MP-RAGE, TR 1.5 s, TE 3.93 ms, inversion recovery time (TI) 0.8 s, 256 slices with no gap, 192 × 256 mm FOV, and 6 minutes 36 seconds). PET data were acquired forty minutes after bolus injection of approximately 210 MBq FDG (single frame, OSEM3D mode, 207 slices with no gap, 1.2 × 1.2 × 1.2 mm voxels, and 40 minutes). During the tracer uptake period, control participants were blindfolded and all participants rested in a dimly lit room without falling asleep.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!