The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using epidermal growth factor (egf)

1

Serum Starvation and EGF Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uninfected or cells infected with WT or mutant TB40/EGFP virus were washed two time with PBS and serum starved in serum-free media for 24h prior to EGF stimulation. After serum starvation, cells were washed with ice cold PBS and incubated on ice for 30 min. Cells were then incubated on ice with serum free media containing 10 nM EGF (Gold Biotechnology) for 30 min, except for no EGF control. Cells were then washed with ice cold PBS. 37°C serum free media was added and samples were incubated at 37°C for 15min to 24h, depending on experiment. Samples were then collected for immunoblotting or chromatin immunoprecipitation, depending of experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

EGFR Signaling Pathway Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NME cells were constructed via stable overexpression of EGFR in normal murine mammary gland (NMuMG) cells as previously described [60 (link)]. These cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 10 μg/mL insulin, penicillin, and streptomycin. For cell signaling assays, cells were plated for 24 h prior to removal of the FBS for an additional 24 h. During this serum starvation, PP2 (Sigma, 529576) or SrcDEL10-ester were added as indicated, and cells were subsequently stimulated with EGF (50 ng/mL) (Goldbio, 1150-04) for 30 min. After this stimulation cells were lysed in a modified RIPA buffer containing 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.25% Sodium Deoxycholate, 1.0% NP40, 0.1% SDS, protease inhibitor cocktail, 10 mM activated sodium ortho-vanadate, 40 mM β-glycerolphosphate, and 20mM sodium fluoride. Equal aliquots of these lysates were separated by reducing SDS PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. These membranes were probed with antibodies against phospho-EGFR Y1068, total EGFR, phosho-STAT3-Y705, total STAT3, phospho-ERK1/2, total ERK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technologies), and tubulin (DSHB). Differential binding of these antibodies was detected using their appropriate secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Glioma Stem Cell Culture and Manipulation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GSC11, GSC23, GSC262, GSC811, GSC214, GSC231 and GSC267, GS2, GS272 and GS711 patient-derived glioma stem cell lines were cultured as neurospheres passaged every 4-7 days in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium containing B-27 Supplement (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), EGF (Gold Bio Technology) and bFGF (FGF2 Gold BioTechnology, St. Louis, MO) (21 (link)). U251HF glioma cells were kindly provided by Dr. W. K. Alfred Yung (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX). The generation and maintenance of the chemiluminescent U251HF-Luc and GSC811-Luc cells were as previously described (16 (link),22 (link)). Cell lines were authenticated at the University of Arizona Genetics Core (https://uagc.arl.arizona.edu/services/complete-solutions/cell-line-authentication). Onalespib (AT13387) was purchased from Medkoo Biosciences, Inc. (Morrisville, NC). Ionizing radiation was delivered alone or in combination with onalespib as described in figure legend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EGFR-Functionalized Nanolipid Particle Assembly

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To form the EGFR-NLPs, we used a protocol modified from the literature [39 (link), 47 (link)]. Briefly, 100 μg egg PC (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) was dried in a glass vial under nitrogen stream. The lipids were solubilized with 10 mM Triton X-100 in PBS with gentle vortexing. To the lipids, 50 μg ApoA1 (Athens Research and Technology, Athens, GA) was added and briefly vortexed. Except where noted, 15 μg EGF (Gold Biotechnology, Olivette, MO) was mixed with approximately 30 μg FLAG-EGFR isolated from insect cells on ice. The EGF/EGFR mixture was added to the lipid/ApoA1 mixture and briefly vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 1–2 hours. To self-assemble the NLPs, the detergent was removed by incubating the assembly mixture with Bio-Beads SM-2 Resin (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), which has been pre-hydrated with methanol, on a nutator for 1–2 hours at 4°C. The NLP mixture was removed from the Bio-Beads with a spin column. For egg PC:ApoA1 and EGFR:ApoA1 optimization experiments, assemblies were performed as above with a constant amount of ApoA1 and varying the amount of egg PC or EGFR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Investigating Growth Factor Signaling Pathways in Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LPA and PTx were from MilliporeSigma. Human and mouse SDF1-α were from Pepro Tech. EGF was from Gold Biotechnology. Sapitinib, erlotinib, and cp-724714 were from Shelleck Chemicals. Trastuzumab was from Genetech. Lapatinib, GDC0941, and saracatinib were from LC Laboratories. Antibodies for EGFR (no. 2232), phospho-EGFRY1068 (no. 3777), HER2 (no. 2165), phospho-HER2Y1221/1222 (no. 2243), AKT (no. 4685), phospho-AKTS473 (no. 4060), Src (no. 2109), phospho-SrcY416 (no. 6943), ERK1/2 (no. 4696) and phospho-ERK1/2T202/Y204 (no. 4370) were from Cell Signaling Technology. GAPDH (sc-47724) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Ki67 (GTX16667) was from GeneTex. EGFR (no. 4267) from Cell Signaling Technology and phospho-SrcY418 (ab4816) from Abcam were used in immunohistochemical staining. Antibodies for LPAR1 (NBP1-03363SS), CXCR4 (NB100- 56437SS), and CXCR7 (NBP2-24779SS) were from Novus Biologicals.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

EGFR Signaling Pathway Activation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CHO-K1 Tet-On cell line, the pBI-Tet vector, and doxycycline were from Clontech. EGF and amphiregulin were from Gold Biotechnology. Epigen, epiregulin, and betacellulin were from Prospec. HB-EGF was from Sigma. TGFα was from Abcam. Erlotinib was from Selleck Chemicals and lapatinib was from VWR. The PY-20 antiphosphotyrosine antibody was from BD Transduction Labs. The site-specific anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies plus the anti-T669 antibody were from Cell Signaling Technology. The phospholipase Cγ, phospho-phospholipase Cγ, Akt, phospho-Akt, and phospho-MAP kinase antibodies were also from Cell Signaling Technology. The MAP kinase antibody was from Transduction Labs. FetalPlex was from Gemini Bioproducts. Cetuximab and pertuzumab were obtained from the Barnes-Jewish Hospital pharmacy. Na125I was from Perkin Elmer. 125I-EGF and 125I-cetuximab were made using the ICl method of Contreras et al (60 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Glioma Cell Lines and Glioma Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human glioma cell lines, LN229 and A172, were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). U251HF glioma cells were kindly provided by Dr. W. K. Alfred Yung (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX); U251HF-Luc were generated by stably transfecting a firefly luciferase gene under a CMV promoter into U251HF cells and maintained as described with the addition of Geneticin (G418–800μg/ml) for U251HF-Luc cells (23 (link)). GSC2, GSC20, GSC11, GSC23 and GSC811 patient-derived glioma stem cell lines (24 (link)) were kindly provided by Dr. Frederick Lang (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) and cultured as neurospheres passaged every 5–7 days in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium containing B-27 Supplement (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), bFGF (FGF2 Gold BioTechnology, St. Luis, MO) and EGF (Gold Bio Technology). Cell lines were authenticated at the University of Arizona Genetics Core (http://uagc.arl.arizona.edu/services/cell-line-authentication-human). Onalespib (AT13387) was purchased from Medkoo Biosciences (Morrisville, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!