The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Plrp s column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The PLRP-S column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. It features a porous polymer resin with a high surface area, enabling efficient separation and resolution of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

39 protocols using plrp s column

1

Oligonucleotide Synthesis and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotides were synthesized using a MerMade 4 (BioAutomation) DNA synthesizer using standard phosphoramidite chemistry. The reagents used for synthesis were from Glen Research. The final dimethoxytrityl (DMT) group was retained for HPLC purification at 90 °C (Agilent PLRP-S column, 250 mm × 4.6 mm; A= 100 mM triethylammonium acetate [TEAA] in 5% [v/v] aqueous acetonitrile [MeCN], B= 100 mM TEAA in MeCN; 5:95 to 30:70 A:B over 30 min at 1 mL/min). Oligonucleotides were subject to detritylation through incubation for 60 min at room temperature in 20% (v/v) aqueous glacial acetic acid. The reaction was quenched by ethanol precipitation. A second round of HPLC was then performed at 90 °C (Agilent PLRP-S column, 250 mm × 4.6 mm; A= 100 mM triethylammonium acetate [TEAA] in 5% [v/v] aqueous acetonitrile [MeCN], B= 100 mM TEAA in MeCN; 0:100 to 25:75 A:B over 40 min at 1 mL/min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Purification by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptide was purified in four batches by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a VWR-Hitachi LaChrom Elite instrument (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany) equipped with a semi-preparative PLRP-S column (325 mm × 30 mm, 30 nm pore diameter, 8 µm particle size; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a VWR-Hitachi L2400 UV detector (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany) and a Foxy R1 fraction collector (Teledyne ISCO, Lincoln, NE, USA). A flow rate of 6 mL min -1 and the following gradient (solvent A: water, 0.1% formic acid (FA), solvent B: acetonitrile, 0.1% FA) was applied: 0 min: 5% B, Elite instrument (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany) equipped with a 717 plus autosampler (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), an analytical PLRP-S column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 30 nm pore diameter, 8 µm particle size; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a VWR-Hitachi L2400 UV detector (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany) and an expressionL cms MS device (Advion, Harlow, UK). A flow rate of 1 mL min -1 and the following gradient (solvent A: water, 0.1% FA, solvent B: acetonitrile, 0.1% FA) was applied: 0.0 min: 5% B, 2.5 min: 5% B, 12.5 min: 60% B, 13.5 min: 95% B, 16.0 min: 95% B, 17.0 min: 5% B, 18.5 min: 5% B. A dead time of 2.0 min was observed. TC(4,8) eluted after retention time of t R = 9.8 min. Fractions deemed sufficiently pure were combined and lyophilized. The peptide was obtained as a white fluffy solid (17.8 mg, 8.65 µmol, 5%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Characterization of Synthetic Aβ40

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Synthetic Aβ40 in powder form
was dissolved in 0.1% NH4OH and assayed for protein concentration
in three ways: a
bicinchoninic acid assay, tyrosine absorbance at 280 nm, and mass
spectrometric determination of Ala, Val, and Leu in an acid hydrolysate.
All three methods showed the material to be 65–70% protein
by weight, with the balance presumably water and/or salts. The purity
of the protein component was determined by two different high-performance
liquid chromatography methods. Method 1 involved a 4.6 mm × 250
mm reversed phase Vydac MS C4 column, mobile phase A composed of 0.1%
NH4OH in water, mobile phase B composed of 0.1% NH4OH in acetonitrile (1/200 in volume), a flow rate of 700 μL/min,
and detection by absorption at 215 nm. The gradient program was 0%
B from 0 to 8 min, with a linear increase to 60% B at 40 min. Method
2 involved a 4.6 mm × 250 mm reversed phase Varian PLRP-S column,
the same mobile phases, a flow rate of 500 μL/min, and detection
by absorption at 278 nm. The gradient program was a linear increase
from 0 to 60% B over 60 min. Only minor peptide impurities were detected
as small peaks eluting earlier than the main peak, barely above the
baseline noise. Method 1 or 2 suggested that the purity of synthetic
Aβ40 in the eluted fraction was >92 or >96%, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparative and Analytical HPLC Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparative HPLC was performed using a Varian ProStar Model 325 HPLC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) equipped with a fraction collector. Preparative separations utilized a Varian PLRP-S column (150 × 25 mm, 100 Å, 10 µm), with a mobile phase comprising 0.1% (v/v) aqueous NH4OH and acetonitrile (20:80 0.01 min, 45:55 25.00 min, 20:80 26.00 min, stop 30 min) at a flow rate of 25 mL/min.
Analytical HPLC was performed on a C18 analytical column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm; Hanbon Sci. & Tech. Huanan, China) coupled with a C18 guard cartridge (4.6 mm × 10 mm, 5 μm; Hedera), maintained at 30 °C. The mobile phase comprised acetonitrile and 0.1 % aqueous TFA, and a gradient method was employed for the analysis (34:66 0.01 min, 41:59 25.00 min, 34:66 25.01 min, stop 30 min). The mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 μm filter and delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The Ket absorbance was monitored at 254 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Blood Biomarker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were collected from the antecubital vein between 9:30 and 10:30 am. Peripheral blood tests were performed to determine red blood cell (RBC) counts, hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) levels, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration. To quantify the active form of hepcidin, hepcidin-25, serum samples were mixed with synthetic human hepcidin (Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan) as an internal standard and applied to a reverse-phase PLRP-S column (5 mm, 300 Å, 150 × 3 × 2.1 mm; Varian, Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Levels of hepcidin-25 in the eluate were measured using a 4000 QTRAP liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) (25 (link)). A LABOSPECT 008α automatic colorimetric analyzer (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Schaumburg, IL, USA) was used to measure serum levels of iron. To test levels of iron stored in the body, we measured the concentrations of ferritin in serum using an iatro ferritin kit (LSI Medience Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The leptin levels were quantified using a human leptin radioimmunoassay kit (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA) (26 (link)). The adipokine adiponectin was measured using a human adiponectin latex kit (LSI Medience Corporation) (27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Reversed-Phase HPLC Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RP-HPLC was performed using a Varian PLRP-S column (100 Å, 8 μm, 150 × 25 mm). As elution buffer A, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water was used. Elution buffer B was composed of acetonitrile, exclusively. Elution conditions were as followed: 0–3 min 25% buffer B; 3–25 min 25%~50% buffer B; 25–27 min 50%~95% buffer B; 27–28 min 95%~25% buffer B; 28–30 min 25% buffer B at 0.6 mL/min. Samples were previously reduced by incubation with DTT at 37 °C for 30 min before performing RP-HPLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Separation Protocols for Diverse Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All HPLC experiments were performed using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II instrument equipped with an Agilent PLRP-S column (150 mm × 7.5 mm) and a diode array UV−vis detector calibrated for detection at 254 nm. A typical reverse-phase separation and elution program involved two solvent lines, 0.1 M TEAA at pH 7.5 on line A and 100% acetonitrile on line B. The column was kept at 70 °C and equilibrated with a 98:2 A/B mixture for 15 min at a flow rate of 2 mL/min. After injection, the following program was run: 98:2 A/B for 10 min, followed by a ramp over 30 min to 75:25 A/B and then held at a constant composition. For the ion-exchange reverse-phase (IERP) method, the same column was treated with 5 mM tetrabutylammonium phosphate (TBAP) at pH 7.5 (line A) and acetonitrile (line B) at a 98:2 A:B ratio. This same composition was kept for 15 min after injection, at which point the composition was linearly changed over 25 min to 50:50 acetonitrile:water (no TBAP) and then held constant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Characterization by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent PLRP-S column (50 mm length, 5 μm particle size, 4.6 mm ID, 1,000 Å pore size) was used. The column was maintained at 70 °C during the run. For each sample, 10 μl protein solution was either injected directly through a union and eluted with 0.1% formic acid/60% acetonitrile/water or injected onto the column and eluted using the following method with mobile phases A (0.1% formic acid/water) and B (0.1% formic acid/acetonitrile). Prior to the gradient, the column was maintained at 0% B for 2 min to wash salts. Then, a linear gradient was applied over 10 min to a final concentration of 100% B. The column was maintained at 100% B for 1 min to wash before changing to 0% B over 0.1 min. Then, the column was re-equilibrated at 0% B for 5.9 min prior to the next run. The data was internally calibrated using sodium formate clusters injected at the end of each run. The data was analysed using Bruker Compass DataAnalysis (v. 4.3), and deconvoluted using the maximum entropy algorithm between selected mass ranges (27–29 kDa for GFP or 25–40kDa for GST–FKBP12). Modification masses used included: GFP fluorophore formation = −20.0256 Da, dehydration = −18.0153 Da, methylation = +14.0266 Da.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Rapid LC-MS Analysis of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were prepared by adding 25 μL of ultrapure water to 75 μL solutions of analytes in acetonitrile + 0.1% TFA. A PLRP-S column (Agilent) was equilibrated to an 85:15 ratio of solvent A (ultrapure water + 0.1% formic acid) to solvent B (acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid). Liquid chromatography separations were achieved by linear gradient elution, transitioning from 15% to 95% solvent B over 6 min followed by a 2 min hold at 95% B. The column was re-equilibrated to 15% solvent B for 2 min in between injections of the same sample (two technical replicates run per sample, 2 μL injection volume, 600 μL/min flow rate, 50°C). Two blank runs were implemented between samples to ensure against column holdover of analytes. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis was carried out in positive mode with a capillary voltage of 2Hz (Agilent 6538 UHD Q-TOF).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Fc-peptide Products

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial analysis of Fc-peptide products was carried out by reversed-phase HPLC/MS of the intact or reduced (5 mM DTT, 55 °C, 30 min) product on the system described below. However, mass accuracy and measurement precision were insufficient to ensure unambiguous determination of the state of the peptide carboxy terminus. Consequently, samples were digested with HRV3C protease (PreScission, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA). Digestions of Fc-peptide were performed for 5 h at 5 °C in a buffer consisting of 20 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT using one unit of enzyme for up to 100 μg of protein. Polypeptides resulting from the digestion were chromatographically resolved on a Waters (Milford, MA) Acquity UPLC with an Agilent (Santa Clara, CA) PLRP-S column (2.1 × 50 mm, 5 μ dp, 1000 Å) using a multi-linear gradient. Buffer A was 0.1 % formic acid, and buffer B was 0.1 % formic acid in acetonitrile. The peptides were mass analyzed on a Waters API US mass spectrometer scanned from m/z 500–3000 at a rate of 1 Hz. The peptide m/z data was deconvoluted to the single-charge mass domain by the MaxEnt3 algorithm implemented in the Waters MassLynx data system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!