The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using whatman 3mm paper

1

Promoter-binding Protein Interaction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA probes containing PO, PB1, PA, and P3R promoters were PCR-amplified with the corresponding primers indicated in Table 2. The amplified DNA was then digested with ScaI and EcoRI restriction enzymes and single end-labeled by filling in the overhanging EcoRI-digested end with [α-32]dATP (6000 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I as described previously (31 ). The labeled fragments (PO, PB1, PA, and P3R probes) were purified using GENECLEAN Turbo (Qbiogen). The retardation reaction mixtures contained 20 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 50 mm KCl, 0.05 nm DNA probe, 250 μg/ml bovine serum albumin, 50 μg/ml unspecific salmon sperm DNA, and purified MbdR-His6 protein in a 9-μl final volume. After incubation of the retardation mixtures for 20 min at 30 °C, mixtures were fractionated by electrophoresis in 5% polyacrylamide gels buffered with 0.5× TBE (45 mm Tris borate, 1 mm EDTA). The gels were dried onto Whatman 3MM paper and exposed to Hyperfilm MP (Amersham Biosciences) accompanied by amplifier screens (Cronex Lightning Plus, DuPont). The radioactivity present in the retardation complexes and free probes was quantified by using a densitometer with the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Radiolabeling DNA Probe for Protein-DNA Interaction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PNI DNA probe (145 bp) was obtained as described previously [21 (link)], digested with EcoRI, and labeled by filling in the overhanging EcoRI-digested end with [α-32P]dATP (6000 Ci∙mmol−1; Amersham Biosciences, Amersham, UK) and the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase as described previously [20 (link)]. The DNA probe was mixed with the purified proteins at the concentration indicated in each assay. The retardation reaction mixtures contained 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM KCl, 0.05 nM DNA probe, 250 μg∙mL−1 bovine serum albumin, and purified His6-BzdR protein in a 9-μL final volume. The samples were fractionated by electrophoresis in 5% polyacrylamide gels buffered with 0.5× TBE (45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA). The gels were dried onto Whatman 3MM paper and exposed to Hyperfilm MP (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DNA Probe Binding Assay for BadR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA probe containing the aliB promoter (PaliB) and the different DNA mutant probes with substitutions at the BadR‐binding site were PCR‐amplified using specific primers pairs (Table S1) and then digested with EcoRI restriction enzyme and single end‐labelled by filling in the overhanging EcoRI‐digested ends with [α‐32]dATP (6000 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) and the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I as described previously (Sambrook & Russell, 2001 ). The DNA labelled fragments were purified using GENECLEAN Turbo (Qbiogen). The retardation reaction mixtures contained 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 0.05 nM DNA probe, 250 μg/ml bovine serum albumin, 50 μg/ml unspecific salmon sperm DNA, and purified His6‐BadR protein in a 9‐μl final volume. After incubation of the retardation mixtures for 20 min at 30°C, mixtures were fractionated by electrophoresis in 5% polyacrylamide gels buffered with 0.5× TBE (45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA). The gels were dried onto Whatman 3MM paper and exposed to Hyperfilm MP (Amersham Biosciences) accompanied by amplifier screens (Cronex Lightning Plus, DuPont). The radioactivity present in the retardation complexes and free probes was quantified by using a densitometer with the Quantity One software (Bio‐Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

N-Glycan Release and Fluorescent Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N-glycans were released from the dissolved samples (1 mg/mL) using PNGase F, (100 mU/mL; Prozyme, San Leandro, CA, USA) in accordance with methods previously described by Royle et al., 2006 and Royle et al,. 2008 [14 (link),15 (link)]. Briefly, samples were reduced and alkylated, immobilized in SDS-gel blocks in 96 well plates and then washed. Released glycans were then fluorescently labelled with 2-aminobenzamide (2AB) by reductive amination [16 (link)]. Excess 2AB reagent was removed by ascending chromatography on Whatman 3MM paper in acetonitrile.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation and Purification of Radiolabeled Ascorbic Acid Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

l‐[1–14C]Ascorbic acid (16 kBq, 0.40 MBq/μmol; GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK) was treated with H2O2 (2 mol H2O2 per mol ascorbate, permitting a 4‐electron oxidation sequence, to yield the oxidation level of OxT) in a final volume of 60 μl for 30 min, then electrophoresed on Whatman 3mm paper in pH 6.5 buffer (pyridine/acetic acid/H2O, 33:1:300 v/v/v containing 5 mm EDTA) at 2.5 kV for 30 min (Fry, 2011). The paper was autoradiographed on Kodak Biofilm for 5 days. The strips corresponding to the 14C‐labelled compounds of interest (OxT or cOxT) were excised, and the compounds eluted in H2O by the Eshdat and Mirelman (1972) method.
Purified [14C]OxG was eluted from electrophoretograms similar to that shown in Figure 5(a) and concentrated in vacuo.
[14C]DHA was produced by ascorbate oxidase (from Cucurbita species; 1 U μl−1) treatment of [1‐14C]AA, in 10 mm formate buffer (pyridinium+, pH 5) and purified on a Dowex 1 anion‐exchange chromatography column, previously washed in (sequentially) 0.5 M NaOH, 0.5 m formic acid, 2 m sodium formate and 10 mm formate (pyridinium+, pH 5). The [14C]DHA was eluted in H2O.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Stress Response Assays for Transgenic Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For expression and promoter analysis, 2 week-old WT and transgenic seedlings were subjected to different abiotic stress and hormone treatments. ABA (100 μM), ACC (ethylene precursor; 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, 100 μM), salt (150 mM, NaCl), osmotic (300 mM, mannitol) and oxidative (50 μM methyl viologen) treatments were given by placing the seedlings on filter paper saturated with respective chemical in the ½ MS solution for 8 h (Tarte et al., 2015 (link)). Dehydration treatment was given by air drying seedlings on Whatman 3 MM paper for 30 min. Heat and cold treatments were given by incubating the seedlings on ½ MS medium at temperature of 37°C and 4°C for 8 h, respectively. Seedlings placed on filter paper saturated with ½ MS solution without any treatment were considered as control and each treatment was given in triplicate. After stress treatment, seedlings were harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C till further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Cellular Glycogen Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with 20 mM [U-14C]glucose (0.05 μCi/μmol). To extract glycogen, cell monolayers were scraped into 100 μl of 30% (w/v) KOH and homogenates were boiled for 15 min. Homogenates were spotted onto Whatman 3 MM paper, and glycogen was precipitated by immersing the paper in ice-cold 66% (v/v) ethanol. Radioactivity in dried papers was counted in a beta-radiation counter. Glycogen synthesis rate was calculated as nanomoles of glucose incorporated per milligram of protein, and results were expressed as the percentage of stimulation over basal (control = 100) [10] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing Yield and Root Traits in Mutant Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four yield-related traits were assessed in T1 homozygous mutant lines and control plants: the number of spikes, number of grains, grain weight, and 1000-grain weight, which was calculated by multiplying the mean grain weight by 1000. The analysis was performed for three biological replicates. The root phenotype was analyzed in the T2 seedlings of homozygous mutant lines and control plants, with seven to 10 biological replicates. Prior to germination, the seeds were placed on wet filter paper in Petri dishes and incubated at 4 ºC for three days for stratification. Then, the seedlings were grown in jars filled with glass beads and Hoagland medium [37 ]. After 10 days of cultivation, the root system of each seedling was scanned with an Epson V750 Pro scanner at 1200 dpi resolution. The total root length; root surface, volume, and diameter; and number of root hairs were analyzed using WinRHIZO software (Regent Instruments, Inc., Quebec, Canada). After scanning, the roots were dried on Whatman 3-MM paper and weighed. Then, the roots were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and subjected to further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring protein synthesis in JJN-3 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
JJN-3 cells (105)were plated in 100 ul methionine-free and cysteine-free RPMI supplemented with 10% dialyzed FBS and treated with compounds at the indicated concentrations for 45 minutes. 35S-methionine (50 μCi) was then added to each well and cells were incubated for an additional 15 minutes at 37°C. Cells were centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 min, washed with 500 μl cold PBS, spun again and the supernatant aspirated. The cell pellet was lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 % NPA40, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate, 0.1 % SDS). Lysate (25 μl) was spotted onto Whatman 3 MM paper (preblocked with 0.1 % methionine), dried, and placed in cold 10 % TCA for 20 min. Filters were transferred to 5 % TCA, boiled for 15 min, washed once with 5% TCA, once with 95 % ethanol, and dried. Radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting. The counts were normalized to protein concentration for each sample, which had been determined using a modified Lowry assay (DC Protein Assay; Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing Female Development in N. crassa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize female development, mating experiments were carried out in triplicate between isolates of opposite mating types lacking the same step in the sphingolipid pathway. Conidia from the isolates were inoculated on two sterile 6 cm in diameter discs of Whatman 3 MM chromatography paper placed in a Petri dish with 5 mL of sterile synthetic crossing medium [41 ]. Whatman 3 MM paper serves as a carbon and energy source for the fungus. The strains were allowed to grow in the dark at room temperature for eighteen days. During this time, the fungus produced perithecia, the N. crassa female mating structure. Sterile water was added as needed to maintain a moist state in the filters. By eighteen days post-inoculation, wildtype perithecia had generated mature ascospores that were ejected onto the lid of the Petri dish. The ascospores were collected from the lid in sterile water using Pasteur pipettes and the number of ascospores was counted using a hemocytometer. Perithecia were manually collected and squashed between a microscope slide and a cover glass to break the perithecia open and release “rosettes” of developing ascospores. A Brightfield microscope was used to view the developing ascospores, which were photographed with a Canon Powershot A620 camera fitted with a microscope adaptor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!