The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using agilent dna microarray scanner g2565ca

1

miR Microarray Experimental Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For miR microarray experiments, after assessment for quality, 500 ng of the extracted total RNA was labeled with Cyanine-3 (Cy3) using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent). Dye incorporation and cRNA yield were assessed using the NanoDrop ND-2000 Spectrophotometer. The labeled RNAs were hybridized onto Agilent Mouse GE 8 × 60K Microarray for 17 h at 65°C in a rotating Agilent hybridization oven. After hybridization, microarrays were stringently washed for 1 min at room temperature with GE Wash Buffer 1 (Agilent, Tokyo, Japan) followed by GE Wash buffer 2 for 1 min at 37°C (Agilent, Tokyo, Japan) and then immediately dried by brief centrifugation. The fluorescent signals were then scanned with the Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (G2565CA) and analyzed using Feature Extraction Software 10.10 (Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microarray-based miRNA Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracted total RNA (500 ng) was labelled with cyanine-3 using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent) after checking to ensure sufficient quality for microRNA microarray experiments. The cRNA yield and dye incorporation were checked using a NANODrop ND-2000 Spectrophotometer. These labelled RNAs were hybridized with the Agilent Mouse GE 8 × 60 K Microarray in a rotating Agilent hybridisation oven for 17 h at 65 °C. After the hybridisation, the microarrays were washed at room temperature for 1 min with GE Wash Buffer 1 (Agilent, Tokyo, Japan), and then washed for 1 min with GE Wash buffer 2 (Agilent) at 37 °C. Finally, they were dried immediately by brief centrifugation. The fluorescence signals were determined using an Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (G2565CA) after stringent washes with GE Wash Buffer 1 and 2 (Agilent) for 1 min each. The fluorescence signals were analysed with Feature Extraction Software 10.10 (Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genome-wide Copy Number Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligo array-CGH analysis was performed using an Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH 60 K microarray (AMADID 021924 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) spanning the entire human genome at a median resolution of 41 kb. Totally, 500 ng of genomic DNA from the 20q-KO and WT cells were differentially labelled by random priming with Cy5-dCTP and Cy3-dCTP. The hybridization was carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol. Arrays were scanned using an Agilent DNA Microarray scanner G2565CA (Agilent Technologies). Microarray data were extracted and visualized using Feature Extraction software v10.7 and Agilent Genomic Workbench (AGW) software v7.0 (Agilent Technologies). Copy number altered regions were detected using the Aberration Detection Method 2 (ADM-2) algorithm set as 6, with a minimum number of three consecutive probes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptome Analysis of Thermal Acclimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from epicotyls of young seedlings grown for 7 d under 30°C/25°C (positive DIF) and 25°C/30°C (negative DIF) (DT/NT, 16 h photoperiod) as described in the preceding subsection. Three biological replicates were used for microarray analysis. Target labeling was performed according to the manual of the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit, One-Color (Agilent Technologies). We used a tomato custom-designed microarray (platform ID “GPL21511”). Hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We scanned the microarray images using an Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner G2565CA (Agilent Technologies). Scanned images were converted to signal data using Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies). Value definition in the data matrix was Log2. GO enrichment analysis among DEGs (top 300 upregulated and top 300 downregulated genes; P < 0.05) was performed using the GO Analysis Toolkit and Database for Agricultural Community (AgriGO, http://systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2/) (Tian et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive miRNA Microarray Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For miRNA microarray experiments, after assessments for quality, 500 ng of extracted total RNA was labeled with Cyanine-3 (Cy3) using a Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent). Dye incorporation and cRNA yields were checked using a NanoDrop ND-2000 Spectrophotometer. Labeled RNAs were hybridized on an Agilent Mouse GE 8×60K Microarray at 65 °C for 17 h in a rotating Agilent hybridization oven. After hybridization, microarrays were washed with GE Wash Buffer 1 (Agilent, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature for 1 min and with GE Wash buffer 2 (Agilent) at 37 °C for 1 min, and then, dried immediately by brief centrifugation. After thorough washes with GE Wash Buffer 1 (Agilent) and GE Wash buffer 2 (Agilent) for 1 min each, fluorescent signals were scanned with an Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner (G2565CA) and analyzed using Feature Extraction Software 10.10 (Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Copy Number Analysis in Bulk Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate DNA copy number changes on bulk tumors, we used the Mouse 244 k Custom Oligo platform (GPL15359 Agilent UNC Perou Lab 1 × 244 k Custom Tiling CGH Array)69 (link). Labeling and hybridization were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit PLUS (Catalog Number 5188–5309). One microgram of DNA from liver or spleen of FVB strain mouse was used as normal reference DNA, which was compared versus 1 μg of DNA from C3Tag DCIS and tumor samples. Microarrays were scanned on an Agilent DNA Microarray scanner (G2565CA) and the data uploaded to the University of North Carolina Microarray Database (www.genome.unc.edu). To determine regions of Copy Number Aberration (CNA), we utilized the R package SWITCHdna18 (link),70 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CGH was performed using the Agilent SurePrint G3 Human CGH 60 K microarray (Agilent Technologies) by spanning the entire human genome at a median resolution of 41 kb. For the hybridization, 500 ng of genomic DNA from the test samples and human reference DNA (Agilent Technologies) were differentially labeled with Cy5–2′-deoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate (dCTP) and Cy3-dCTP by random priming. An Agilent DNA Microarray scanner G2565CA (Agilent Technologies) was used to scan the arrays, and data were extracted and visualized using Feature Extraction software v10.7. Copy number–altered regions were detected with Agilent Genomic Workbench software v7.0 (Agilent Technologies) using the Aberration Detection Method 2 algorithm set as 6, with a minimum number of three consecutive probes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacillus subtilis Transcriptome Profiling via Custom Microarray

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Per sample, 100 ng of total RNA was combined with Array Control RNA spikes (Ambion) and labeled using a low input Quick Amp whole-transcript (WT) labeling kit (Agilent) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each hybridization mixture comprised 1.1 μg test (Cy3) and 1.1 μg reference (Cy5) components, representing a common reference pool of all samples. The samples were dried, and 1.98 μl water was added. The hybridization cocktail was made according to the manufacturer’s instructions (NimbleGen Arrays User’s Guide—Gene Expression Arrays Version 5.0, Roche NimbleGen). Then, 7.2 μl from this mix was added to each sample. The samples were incubated for 5 min at 65°C and 5 min at 42°C prior to loading. Hybridization samples were loaded onto a 12-by-135,000 custom microarray designed against Bacillus subtilis (Roche NimbleGen, Inc.) as used in previous studies (4 (link), 46 (link)). Microarrays were hybridized for 20 h at 42°C with a NimbleGen hybridization system (Roche NimbleGen, Inc.). Afterward, the slides were washed according to the NimbleGen Arrays User’s Guide—Gene Expression Arrays Version 6.0 and scanned with an Agilent G2565CA DNA microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microarray Analysis of iMEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this report, we used a part of the data of microarray analysis which has been previously reported by us (Nakanome et al. 2013) . The analyses were carried out in biological triplicates using iMEFs derived from independent mouse embryos. One additional measurement of Bach1-deficient iMEFs was newly carried out because the analysis of Bach1-deficient iMEFs used biological duplicate in our previously report (Nakanome et al. 2013) . Briefly, total RNAs were extracted from immortalized MEF cells using Total RNA Isolation Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cyanine 3-labeled cDNAs were synthesized from 100 ng of total RNA using Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent). Labeled samples were hybridized to the whole mouse genome array slides (4 9 44, G4122F) for 17 h at 65 °C. The scanning and quantitative values analyses of fluorescent signals were carried out with the Agilent G2565CA DNA Microarray Scanner. The data were analyzed, clustered and visualized using GeneSpring GX software program version 11 (Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!