The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Archiva

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands

Archiva is a laboratory storage and organization system designed for secure and efficient sample management. It provides temperature-controlled storage and inventory tracking capabilities to ensure the integrity of valuable samples and specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using archiva

1

Quantifying Visceral and Subcutaneous Adiposity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The body fat content was assessed in visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue areas using a 3.0 T clinical MRI scanner (Archiva, Philips Medical System, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The standard array coils were used, and the MRI scans were performed by experienced radiologists who were blinded to the intervention groups and laboratory findings. The MRI scans were conducted at the abdominal level between the L4 and L5 vertebrae in the supine position. Segmentation of the images into the VFA and SFA was performed by two trained investigators using the SliceOmatic image analysis software (version 4.2; Tomovision Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anthropometric and Visceral Fat Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All anthropometric indices and biochemical measurements were collected at baseline and during follow-up. Height, weight, WC, and resting blood pressure were measured using standardized methods [8 (link)]. BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height2 (m2). NC was measured with the subject standing and the head in the horizontal plane position. The measuring tape was positioned around the inferior margin of the laryngeal prominence and perpendicular to the long axis of the neck. The change in NC (%) was calculated as (NC at follow-up − NC at baseline)/NC at baseline × 100%.
The determination of VFA has been explained in previous studies [8 (link)], briefly described as follows: visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue areas were assessed using a 3.0T clinical MRI scanner (Archiva; Philips Medical System, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), which imaged the abdominal region between the L4 and L5 vertebrae with the subject in the supine position. Segmentation of the images in the VFA and subcutaneous fat area (SFA) was carried out by the Slice-O-Matic image analysis software version 4.2 (Tomovision Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada). Abdominal obesity was defined as a VFA ≥ 80 cm2 [14 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Body Composition and Fat Distribution Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total FM, total fat percentage (fat%), leg FM, leg fat%, trunk FM, and trunk fat% were measured with a body composition analyzer (MC-780MA; Tanita Corp, Tokyo, Japan) in all participants. In the population with obesity, the determination of VFA and SFA was carried out by an experienced radiologist, as previously described.16 (link) VFA and SFA were measured briefly using a 3.0T clinical MRI scanner (Archiva; Philips Medical Systems Amsterdam, Netherlands) that captured images of the participant’s supine abdomen between the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The Slice-O-Matic image analysis program, version 4.2 (Tomovision Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada), was used to segment the VFA and SFA in the pictures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Abdominal Fat Measurement by MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI is an internationally recognized method for precisely measuring abdominal fat [62] (link). MRI scanning was performed on all participants using a 3.0 T clinical MRI scanner (Archiva, Philips Medical System, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). MRI scans were obtained by T1 weighted sequence at the umbilicus level between L4 and L5 vertebrae in the supine position. The scanning thickness was 1 cm, the scanning field was 42 cm × 42 cm. Six layers were scanned. SliceOmatic software 4.2 (Tomovision, Montreal, Canada) was used to process images. Two trained observers analyzed the images independently. If the difference between their results was <10%, then took the averages as the recorded results. If the difference was larger than or equal to 10%, a third person who did not know the results would reanalyze the images and take the averages of the two results with a difference <10%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bladder Cancer Brachytherapy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients with an applicator underwent T2-weighted MR imaging, with a 3 mm slice thickness using a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner (Philips Archiva, Philips Medical Systems B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and CT imaging with a 1.25 mm slice thickness (GE Brightspeed, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) for brachytherapy planning. All patients followed the bladder filling protocol with 50-100 ml saline before the MRI and CT scans. The images were exported to brachytherapy planning system (BrachyVision version 13.6, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All target volumes and OAR delineations were performed on both image modalities by a same radiation oncologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!