The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using lsm510 imaging system

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Spinal Cord and DRG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anesthetized by pentobarbital and perfused transcardially with PBS followed by ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS. Transverse L4 spinal cord sections (30 μm) and L4 DRG sections (15 μm) were incubated for 48 h at 4 °C with primary antibody for CD11b (1:1,000, Serotec, USA), Iba1 (1:2,000, Wako), GFAP (1:500, Chemicon, USA), NeuN (1:200, Chemicon), APC (1:200, Calbiochem, USA), NF200 (neurofilament 200, 1:400), P2X3R (1:2,500, Chemicon), IB4 (isolectin B4)-Alexa488 (1:200, Invitrogen, USA) and PKC-γ (protein kinase C gamma, 1:5,000, Santa Cruz, USA). Tissue sections were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 405, 488 or 546 (1:1,000, Molecular Probes) and mounted with VECTASHIELD with or without DAPI (Vector Laboratories, USA). Three to five sections from the L4 spinal cord segments or L4 DRG segments of each mouse were randomly selected and analysed using an LSM510 Imaging System (Carl Zeiss, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Identification of Spinal Cord Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anaesthetized by pentobarbital and perfused transcardially with PBS followed by ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS. The L4 segment of the lumbar spinal cord were removed, post-fixed in the same fixative and placed in 30% sucrose solution for 24 h at 4 °C. Transverse L4 spinal cord sections (30 μm) were incubated for 48 h at 4 °C with primary antibody. Identification of cell types was performed using the following markers: microglia, Cd11b (1:1,000, Serotec), Iba1 (ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule-1, 1:2,000, Wako) and Cd68 (1:1,000, Serotec); astrocytes, GFAP (1:500, Chemicon); neurons, NeuN (Neuronal Nuclei, 1:200, Chemicon). Spinal sections were incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 546 (1:1,000, Molecular Probes) and mounted in VECTASHIELD with or without DAPI (Vector Laboratories). Three to five sections from the L4 spinal cord segments of each mouse were randomly selected and analysed using an LSM510 Imaging System (Carl Zeiss, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bright-field images were taken using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 + microscope, Nikon Digital Sight DS-F12 camera, and Nikon NIS 4.0 imaging software. Images of immunohistochemistry were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 5 Exciter-AxioImager M1 imaging system and Zeiss LSM510 imaging system. Image stacks were generated by scanning at intervals of 4 μm for lower magnification and at intervals of 0.8 μm for higher magnification using filters of the appropriate wavelengths. The stacks were analyzed, merged, and projected using ImageJ software from the National Institutes of Health. Figure panels were prepared using Adobe Photoshop CS6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After three washes with PBS, cells were fixed with 4% p-formaldehyde for 30 min. After three washes with PBS, cells were blocked and permeabilized in PBS added with 2% FBS, 2% BSA, 4% normal goat serum and 0.2% Triton X-100. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies for overnight at 4℃. After washing with PBS, proteins were visualized using secondary species-specific IgG conjugated with fluorescence. Cells were observed by confocal laser-scanning microscopy using an LSM-510 imaging system (Carl Zeiss Inc., Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!