The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dragen 3

Manufactured by Illumina
Sourced in United States

The Dragen 3.7.3 is a hardware-accelerated bioinformatics platform designed to analyze high-throughput sequencing data. It provides rapid and accurate processing of genomic data, including alignment, variant calling, and secondary analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using dragen 3

1

Circulating Tumor Content Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Insert size distributions across the entire genome were calculated using Illumina Dragen 3.7.3. The ratio of the number of fragments with sizes less than or equal to 150 bp and greater than 150 bp but less than 500 bp were calculated for all samples. Tumor fraction was estimated for all samples using the ichorCNA variant calling pipeline as previously described in ref. 38 (link). Briefly, the algorithm uses a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) to predict copy number segments and to estimate the circulating tumor content from total cfDNA sequenced. The details of this approach have been previously described in ref. 38 (link). For each of the categories (i.e., proportion of fragments <150 bp, tumor fraction, and tumor concentration) samples were classified by tumor type, and a Kruskal–Wallis test was performed between cancer types. Only samples collected at the time of diagnosis were used for this analysis. A p value <0.01 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of Copy Number Alterations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reads were aligned to the 1000 genomes phase 2 reference genome (hs37d5) which includes build GRCh37 and decoy sequences: (ftp://ftp-trace.ncbi.nih.gov/1000genomes/ftp/technical/reference/phase2_reference_assembly_sequence/hs37d5.fa.gz) using the Illumina Dragen 3.7.3 aligner. The ichorCNA algorithm was subsequently applied using the depth of coverage obtained from 500 kb bins across the genome38 (link). When available, LP-WGS data from the LB samples were compared with CNA profiles of the matching primary tumors generated from CMA assays (CytoScanHD or OncoScan, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Briefly, all 59 Cytoscan or OncoScan arrays performed on the tumor tissue were processed using ASCAT and NxClinical (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA) using the default settings, except that the Piecewise Constant Fitting (PCF) penalty was increased to 95 to account for FFPE degradation of samples. Subsequently, the segmented calls from LP-WGS and CMA were binned into 1 Mb regions across the entire genome. Pearson’s correlation for each pair of samples across all bins over autosomes was calculated for all CMA samples and LP-WGS samples with purity greater than 10%. All samples with a Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r2) less than 0.7 were manually examined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Illumina NovaSeq Sequencing with DRAGEN Variant Calling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HG002 DNA was prepared using Illumina DNA PCR-Free Library Prep. The library was sequenced on NovaSeq 6000 with 151 bp paired-end reads. Illumina DRAGEN 3.6.3 was used to align sequencing reads and call variants. SNP and INDEL were filtered using the following hard filters:
DRAGENHardSNP:snp: MQ < 30.0 || MQRankSum < −12.5 || ReadPosRankSum < −8.0;DRAGENHardINDEL:indel: ReadPosRankSum < −20.0
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Illumina NovaSeq Sequencing with DRAGEN Variant Calling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HG002 DNA was prepared using Illumina DNA PCR-Free Library Prep. The library was sequenced on NovaSeq 6000 with 151 bp paired-end reads. Illumina DRAGEN 3.6.3 was used to align sequencing reads and call variants. SNP and INDEL were filtered using the following hard filters:
DRAGENHardSNP:snp: MQ < 30.0 || MQRankSum < −12.5 || ReadPosRankSum < −8.0;DRAGENHardINDEL:indel: ReadPosRankSum < −20.0
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Tests for Myopathy Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genetic tests for patients with myopathy included whole-exome sequencing (WES) for point mutation, mass spectrometry, and Southern blot for repeats. WES and the following analysis were conducted with a Next-Generation Sequencing platform consisting of Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA) for librarying, DRAGEN 3.7.5 (Illumina, Inc.) for variant calling, Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (version 100), and Jan-novar (version 0.35) with dbNSFP 4.1a for annotation. The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms including “myopathy” or “muscle” were adopted to rank the disease-associated genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Whole Exome Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole exome sequencing was performed according to the referenced paper as follows [53 (link)]. WES was conducted on 500 ng of genomic DNA from the probands and their family members. Fragment libraries were prepared from the sheared samples by sonication and target enrichment was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Agilent SureSelect QXT ALL Human Exon V6 Kit or Roche KAPA HyperExome Kit). Captured DNA was amplified followed by solid-phase bridge amplification and paired-end sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Alignment of reads to the human reference sequence (hg38 assembly) and variant detection were performed using DRAGEN 3.7.5 (Illumina, Inc.) with the alt-aware configuration. The variant annotation information was obtained from Variant Effect Predictor (version 100) and Jannovar (version 0.35) with dbNSFP 4.1a. The novel variants were filtered against 1000 Genomes (1000 genomes release phase 3, http://www.1000genomes.org/, accessed date: 28 July 2022), dbSNP (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_summary.cgi accessed date: 28 July 2022), and the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomad.broadinstitute.org accessed date: 28 July 2022) [54 (link),55 (link),56 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!