Aquasil ultra lv

Manufactured by Dentsply

Sourced in Germany, United States

Aquasil Ultra LV is a low-viscosity impression material manufactured by Dentsply. It is designed for use in dental impression procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Gc fujirock type 4, by GC Corporation (2 mentions) Aquasil ultra xlv, by Dentsply (2 mentions) Geomagic design x and control x, by 3D Systems (1 mentions) Aquasil soft putty, by Dentsply (1 mentions) Geomagic control software, by 3D Systems (1 mentions)

4 protocols using aquasil ultra lv

Volumetric and Linear Dental Impressions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Dental impressions were obtained twice (at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery) using impression materials (Aquasil Ultra LV and Aquasil Ultra XLV; Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and individual trays made by a 3D printer. Dental casts were poured out of dental stone (GC Fujirock type 4; GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and digitized using a dental scanner (ZEISS COMET 5M, Oberkochen, Germany).
The scanned STL file was superimposed on the basis of static points (non-moving reference point: canine and first molar) using a 3D metrology problem (Geomagic Design X and Control X; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA). The volumetric and linear measurements were performed in the overlapping state (Figure 3C and D).

Lee D., Lee Y., Kim S., Lee J.T, & Ahn J.S. (2022). Evaluation of regeneration after the application of 2 types of deproteinized bovine bone mineral to alveolar bone defects in adult dogs. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 52(5), 370-382.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Custom Tray Molding and Definitive Impression Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Using one of the custom trays, border molding was completed by the operator with the conventional method with low fusing impression compound (DPI Pinnacle, The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd., Mumbai, Maharashtra, India). Buccal and labial molding was carried out by adding softened low fusing impression compound in sections to the tray borders and moving the lips and cheeks upward, forward, and downward. Posterior palatal seal was functionally recorded by applying the softened compound from one hamular notch to other and instructing the patient in valsalva maneuver[13 (link)] [Figure 1a]. Any excess material flowing onto the ridge area was scrapped using a Bard-Parker blade (Aspen Surgical Products, Caledonia, USA). After the wax spacer was removed, holes were made in the tray over the median palatal raphe, anterolateral and posterolateral regions of the hard palate[1 ] for relief as well as to aid in the retention of the impression material. A tray adhesive (Universal Tray Adhesive, Zhermack, Italy) was applied to the inner surface of the tray. This was followed by making a definitive impression using light viscosity addition silicone (Aquasil Ultra LV, Dentsply, USA) [Figure 1b].

Qanungo A., Aras M.A., Chitre V., Coutinho I., Rajagopal P, & Mysore A. (2016). Comparative evaluation of border molding using two different techniques in maxillary edentulous arches: A clinical study. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society, 16(4), 340-345.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Replica Fabrication for Dental Restoration Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

After 14 days (baseline) and at each follow-up visit, impressions of the restorations were taken. Two impressions were taken with a low-viscosity A-silicone (Aquasil Ultra LV, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany), whereby the first impression was discarded in each case in order to bind and remove any residual debris that might have remained despite surface cleaning. The study teeth were cleaned with a soft rotating brush and dried with oil-free compressed air. A small amount of impression material was blown into a thin film towards the sulcus and approximal region with a gentle air stream. Additional impression material was then applied until the impression achieved the required stability. The impression was removed, disinfected, and embedded in Aquasil Soft putty (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany).
For replica fabrication conducted in the clinic’s research laboratory, the impressions were poured with an epoxy resin (Stycast 1266; Emerson & Cuming, Westerlo, Belgium) under controlled conditions. The replicas were trimmed, mounted with carbon (Leit-C-Plast, Neubauer Chemicals, Münster, Germany) on metal sample plates (sample plate with pen, 12 mm, Plano GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), and sputtered with gold (10 nm, LOT MiniSputterCoater Automatic MSC1T, Liebscher GmbH, Schöffengrund, Germany). For a blinded evaluation, they were randomly labeled with a number later decoded for statistical analysis.

Haak R., Stache G., Schneider H., Häfer M., Schmalz G, & Schulz-Kornas E. (2023). Effect of the Adhesive Strategy on Clinical Performance and Marginal Integrity of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions in a Randomized 36-Month Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(18), 5776.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Quantifying Dental Changes After Orthodontic Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Before (T0) and 24 weeks after (T1) surgery, dental models were fabricated by taking impressions of the mandibular dentition using prefabricated individual trays made from a self-cured acrylic resin (Formatray^®; Kerr Manufacturing, Romulus, MI, USA) and polyvinylsiloxane impression materials (Aquasil Ultra LV^® and Aquasil Ultra XLV^®; Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany), and dental stone (GC Fujirock^® type 4; GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to prepare dental casts. The two dental casts obtained at T0 and T1 were scanned (Imetric 3D, Courgenay, Switzerland) and superimposed on the basis of the positions of the posterior teeth that were not included in the orthodontic treatment (Geomagic Control software; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA). The distances between the incisal tips at T0 and T1 were measured on the superimposed image (Figure 3A). The measurements were performed for I1 and I3 on both sides to assess the amount of anterior movement. The distances between the incisal tips of I3 and the adjacent canine on each side were also measured at each time point.

Song Y.W., Jung H., Han S.Y., Paeng K.W., Kim M.J., Cha J.K., Choi Y.J, & Jung U.W. (2020). Effects of soft tissue grafting prior to orthodontic treatment on preventing gingival recession in dogs. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 50(4), 226-237.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!